Samsung L700 review: Cool as Metal

07 October 2008
Samsung L700 is a lower midrange fella and its main selling points are solid construction, metal body and fast 3G speeds. Before you frown at the shortish specs list do remember that it's not aiming high. It's set instead to address...

Sort by:

  • j
  • jack
  • vG4
  • 27 Dec 2008

hey iwant know l700 sound quality, pic clarity
anybody tell about it?

    • m
    • matrixneos
    • n}%
    • 10 Dec 2008

    Nou gut telephone !

      • B
      • Bala
      • utY
      • 22 Nov 2008

      Hey,

      Please tell me about sound clarity at phone and Head phone, and then tell me about Talk time

        • S
        • Stefano el Greco
        • ixd
        • 20 Nov 2008

        Hi i just bought it and i like it so much but does anybody knows how to mute the keys? The sound they make its a bit annoying! Thanks!

          • I
          • Ivan
          • ijB
          • 12 Nov 2008

          how come my l700 doesn't have the diff. dialling displays?!

            • M
            • Mary
            • puk
            • 06 Nov 2008

            You can't change the themes!!! I wouldn't like to have that silly orange one all the time:/
            and the battery is so bad...
            thought to buy it myself, but ahanged my mind although it looks really nice...

              • C
              • CHARLIE
              • v0X
              • 30 Oct 2008

              ohh what a cold like an ice.,. but cool as metal.,., sumsung the high quality brand.

                • D
                • David
                • tDC
                • 23 Oct 2008

                I just bought L700 yesterday, it's great overall, but one thing.. when i try to upload files 1 mb or more, the USB data transver rate is very slow !

                  • H
                  • Hindustani
                  • 4nb
                  • 09 Oct 2008

                  The "Speakerphone Loudness" and "Audio Quality" tests results are scattered all over the different reviews of various phones. Won't it be just nice to compile and display them in a well-stacked-up fashion within a couple of pages?

                  gsmarena.com/samsung_b2700-review-279p3.php

                  gsmarena.com/latest_features-review-171p3.php

                    • K
                    • Kal
                    • 2SU
                    • 08 Oct 2008

                    Power2B, 07 Oct 2008It's a nice phone but it looks also like SAGEM my721X Di... moreWhat segam crap you are talking about. They both have brushed metal finsh, that all. So? FYI Most of the segam phone looks like motorola designed it. lol

                      • P
                      • Power2B
                      • pu4
                      • 07 Oct 2008

                      It's a nice phone but it looks also like SAGEM my721X

                      Did Samsung again cut a piece of cake on other designs?
                      Yeap!

                        • C
                        • CSingh
                        • 4ae
                        • 07 Oct 2008

                        4TH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! L700 looks to be one of the best "budget" phones

                          • ?
                          • Anonymous
                          • mVk
                          • 07 Oct 2008

                          Of course it was impossible to compare this Samsung with all offerings from other brands but when i start reading the text/review first thing crossed my mind was the obvious (to me!) comparison with Nokia 6300, because the slim look and the metal body.

                            • ?
                            • Anonymous
                            • P43
                            • 07 Oct 2008

                            2nd!
                            resolution of ~2" should be 240x320

                              • ?
                              • Anonymous
                              • 3p8
                              • 07 Oct 2008

                              First!!! Nice fone but screen is terrible, would go for a SE instead