Samsung Galaxy A54 review
Android 13 and One UI 5.1 is a nice combo
The Galaxy A54 runs Android 13, augmented by Samsung's One UI, in its latest 5.1 incarnation. Samsung promises "up to" 4 years of OS upgrades and 5 years of security patches. That's more or less the flagship treatment - the S23s run the same combo and gets the same update policy.
In any case, you'd be getting the same looks as higher-end Galaxy models, minus some of the more niche features. The list of proprietary Samsung features that the S series have and the A54 doesn't is shorter than on the A14 - essentially, only DeX is missing.
You can choose between a few clock styles of the Always-on Display or opt for an Image Clock. Music info is also supported. The AoD can be always-off, always-on, scheduled, shown only when new notifications are available, or you can opt for tap-to-show for 10s.
The under-display fingerprint reader will likely be the primary method of unlocking for most, but you can still use face unlock either instead of or alongside it. It can be more convenient in certain situations, but it generally is less secure since it's just using the selfie camera. You can have the fingerprint icon displayed on the AoD or not, and you can have the reader itself always on or only available after you wake up the screen.
Security options • Biometrics • Fingerprint settings • Fingerprint settings • Fingerprint enrollment
The experience when dealing with the fundamentals is straightforward and familiar. The app drawer, notification shade, recent apps, lock screen and home screen, are all business as usual, as is the general Settings menu.
The accent color palette is automatically generated based on your wallpaper, and the system gives you a wide choice of color combinations and that palette can also be applied to app icons.
One UI 5.1 basics: Lockscreen • Homescreen • App drawer • Notifications • Quick settings • Task switcher
Widgets can now be stacked, and you can switch between stacked widgets with a simple swipe. Keep in mind that not all widgets support stacking, so app developers might have to get around that pretty soon.
Modes and routines, a feature similar to Apple's Focus, is present on the Galaxy A14 5G's Core build too. You can choose a mode based on what you are doing right now and execute certain actions, change sound profiles, display settings, notifications, etc. For instance, the driving Routines profile can be set up to turn on DnD mode and launch Spotify automatically, for example. You can even trigger certain Routines with actions of your choice, such as turning on the hotspot or airplane mode.
Familiar proprietary Samsung features include the Edge panels - the panes that show up when you swipe in from the side and provide tools and shortcuts to apps and contacts. Game launcher, the hub for all your games, also provides options for limiting distraction when gaming is here to stay as well. An in-house Gallery app and a proprietary file manager are both present, as well as Samsung's Internet web browser. Split-screen multitasking is also an option.
Edge panel • Game Launcher • Gallery • File manager • Split-screen
Performance and benchmarks
One of the more significant upgrades the Galaxy A54 brings is the chipset. Samsung's in-house Exynos 1380, manufactured on a 5nm process, comes with a more powerful CPU and GPU compared to the Exynos 1280 that powered the A53. A case could be made that the A54 simply returns things to the baseline set by the A52s (Snapdragon 778G), which the A53 downgraded from, but if we put a one-year limit on our memory, the A54 is a step up.
So the CPU here has a two-cluster arrangement with 4x Cortex-A78 cores clocked at up to 2.4GHz and another 4x Cortex-A55 rated at up to 2.0GHz. The E1280's CPU has the same types of cores, ticking at the same frequencies, only it's a 2+6 setup - so multi-core CPU-intense tasks should benefit from the new chipset. For reference, the SD778G in the A52s has a 1+3+4 core setup, with 4 A78s and 4 A55s, with altogether slightly lower frequencies.
The GPU that's part of the E1380 is a Mali-G68 MP5 - that's 1 more MP than the A1280's GPU, indicating an extra core.
Memory configurations start from 128GB of storage and 6GB of RAM, and top out at 256GB/8GB. Our review unit is the medium option - 128GB/8GB.
Indeed, it takes a quick look at the GeekBench results to notice that the A54 is more or less on par with the A52s, both ahead of the A53. The Galaxy is bested by the Nothing Phone (1) and the Xiaomi 13 Lite in both single-core and multi-core testing, and such is the case with the Pixel 6 ('a' or otherwise) too, with the Google phones having a substantial advantage under single-core load. The Galaxy does beat both lower-end Motorolas though, the Moto G82 and the Edge 30 Neo.
GeekBench 5 (single-core)
Higher is better
-
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
1073 -
Google Pixel 6a
1047 -
Google Pixel 6
1030 -
Xiaomi 12T
925 -
Realme 10 Pro+
842 -
Nothing Phone (1)
820 -
Xiaomi 13 Lite
795 -
Galaxy A34
781 -
Galaxy A52s 5G
771 -
Galaxy A54
770 -
Galaxy A53 5G
743 -
Moto G82
671 -
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
670 -
Nokia X30
663 -
OnePlus Nord 2T
491
GeekBench 5 (multi-core)
Higher is better
-
Xiaomi 12T
3756 -
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
3458 -
Nothing Phone (1)
3024 -
Xiaomi 13 Lite
2936 -
Google Pixel 6
2899 -
Google Pixel 6a
2876 -
Galaxy A52s 5G
2801 -
OnePlus Nord 2T
2790 -
Galaxy A54
2703 -
Realme 10 Pro+
2371 -
Galaxy A34
2316 -
Moto G82
1977 -
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
1964 -
Nokia X30
1920 -
Galaxy A53 5G
1891
GeekBench 6 (single-core)
Higher is better
-
OnePlus Nord 2T
1107 -
Galaxy A34
1034 -
Galaxy A54
1008 -
Galaxy A53 5G
947 -
Xiaomi 13 Lite
938
GeekBench 6 (multi-core)
Higher is better
-
OnePlus Nord 2T
3350 -
Galaxy A54
2797 -
Galaxy A34
2518 -
Xiaomi 13 Lite
2434 -
Galaxy A53 5G
1941
The generational relationship between the last three A5x phones remains the same in Antutu, where the A54 is essentially tied with the A52s, while the A53 is trailing. The Xiaomi, Nothing, and Google phones are ahead of the A54 by various margins, though the Edge 30 Neo and Moto G82 are still behind the Galaxy.
AnTuTu 9
Higher is better
-
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
827929 -
Xiaomi 12T
780204 -
Google Pixel 6a
712092 -
Google Pixel 6
676831 -
OnePlus Nord 2T
604467 -
Nothing Phone (1)
592789 -
Xiaomi 13 Lite
534143 -
Realme 10 Pro+
522376 -
Galaxy A54
506678 -
Galaxy A52s 5G
506432 -
Galaxy A34
472126 -
Nokia X30
403732 -
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
380818 -
Moto G82
380812 -
Galaxy A53 5G
379313
The advantage of an extra GPU core over the predecessor shows in graphics benchmarks, where the A54 results correlate essentially precisely to the number of GPU cores - the A54's numbers are 25% higher. It's somewhat amusing that the A52s still has a slight edge, two year's later. Similarly to the other tests, the Galaxy proves more powerful than the Motos but not as good as the Phone (1), the Xiaomi 13 Lite, or the Pixels.
GFX Aztek ES 3.1 High (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
Google Pixel 6a
47 -
Google Pixel 6
46 -
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
43 -
OnePlus Nord 2T
31 -
Nothing Phone (1)
23 -
Xiaomi 13 Lite
23 -
Galaxy A54
19 -
Galaxy A52s 5G
19 -
Galaxy A34
17 -
Realme 10 Pro+
16 -
Galaxy A53 5G
15 -
Moto G82
12 -
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
12 -
Nokia X30
12
GFX Aztek ES 3.1 High (offscreen 1440p)
Higher is better
-
Google Pixel 6
30 -
Google Pixel 6a
29 -
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
26 -
OnePlus Nord 2T
22 -
Nothing Phone (1)
15 -
Xiaomi 13 Lite
15 -
Galaxy A54
13 -
Galaxy A52s 5G
13 -
Realme 10 Pro+
11 -
Galaxy A34
11 -
Galaxy A53 5G
10 -
Moto G82
7.9 -
Nokia X30
7.9 -
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
7.8
GFX Aztek Vulkan High (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
Google Pixel 6
43 -
Google Pixel 6a
39 -
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
35 -
OnePlus Nord 2T
29 -
Nothing Phone (1)
23 -
Xiaomi 13 Lite
23 -
Galaxy A52s 5G
20 -
Galaxy A54
19 -
Galaxy A34
16 -
Realme 10 Pro+
15 -
Galaxy A53 5G
15 -
Moto G82
13 -
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
12 -
Nokia X30
12
GFX Aztek Vulkan High (offscreen 1440p)
Higher is better
-
Google Pixel 6a
32 -
Google Pixel 6
30 -
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
23 -
OnePlus Nord 2T
20 -
Xiaomi 13 Lite
17 -
Nothing Phone (1)
16 -
Galaxy A52s 5G
14 -
Galaxy A54
13 -
Realme 10 Pro+
10 -
Galaxy A53 5G
10 -
Galaxy A34
10 -
Moto G82
8.2 -
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
8.2 -
Nokia X30
8.2
GFX Car Chase ES 3.1 (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
62 -
Google Pixel 6
57 -
Google Pixel 6a
51 -
OnePlus Nord 2T
40 -
Nothing Phone (1)
33 -
Xiaomi 13 Lite
33 -
Galaxy A52s 5G
28 -
Galaxy A54
25 -
Galaxy A34
23 -
Realme 10 Pro+
21 -
Galaxy A53 5G
19 -
Nokia X30
17 -
Moto G82
16 -
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
16
GFX Car Chase ES 3.1 (offscreen 1080p)
Higher is better
-
Google Pixel 6
66 -
Google Pixel 6a
66 -
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
63 -
OnePlus Nord 2T
50 -
Xiaomi 13 Lite
39 -
Nothing Phone (1)
37 -
Galaxy A52s 5G
33 -
Galaxy A54
31 -
Realme 10 Pro+
27 -
Galaxy A34
26 -
Galaxy A53 5G
23 -
Moto G82
21 -
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
20 -
Nokia X30
20
GFX Manhattan ES 3.1 (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
Google Pixel 6
90 -
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
82 -
Google Pixel 6a
60 -
Xiaomi 13 Lite
59 -
Nothing Phone (1)
58 -
OnePlus Nord 2T
56 -
Galaxy A52s 5G
49 -
Galaxy A54
46 -
Galaxy A34
41 -
Realme 10 Pro+
38 -
Galaxy A53 5G
35 -
Moto G82
30 -
Nokia X30
30 -
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
29
GFX Manhattan ES 3.1 (offscreen 1080p)
Higher is better
-
Google Pixel 6
117 -
Google Pixel 6a
116 -
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
81 -
OnePlus Nord 2T
80 -
Nothing Phone (1)
65 -
Xiaomi 13 Lite
64 -
Galaxy A52s 5G
56 -
Galaxy A54
52 -
Realme 10 Pro+
45 -
Galaxy A34
44 -
Galaxy A53 5G
38 -
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
35 -
Nokia X30
35 -
Moto G82
34
3DMark Wild Life Vulkan 1.1 (offscreen 1440p)
Higher is better
-
Google Pixel 6
6832 -
Google Pixel 6a
6066 -
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
5797 -
OnePlus Nord 2T
4577 -
Xiaomi 13 Lite
2969 -
Nothing Phone (1)
2921 -
Galaxy A54
2818 -
Galaxy A52s 5G
2491 -
Galaxy A34
2313 -
Galaxy A53 5G
2292 -
Realme 10 Pro+
2252 -
Nokia X30
1214 -
Moto G82
1211 -
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
1201
The A54 was also very consistent under sustained GPU load, with both the Wild Life and Wild Life Extreme stress test returning essentially constant results for the entirety of the 20-minute runs.
The phone wasn't quite as rock-solid under prolonged load on the CPU, however. The choppy graph in the CPU Throttling test isn't pretty to look at and suggests potentially inconsistent performance, while the dip to 54% of the maximum result is among the lowest ones we've seen.
Reader comments
- Laynejr
- 08 Nov 2024
- mig
For under 300€ the A54 is not expensive. It's top tier budget phone. Games run smoothly.
- Anonymous Bel
- 03 Oct 2024
- CAy
Screen unresponsive after September 2024 security update. Apparently many people are facing this issue as read on other forums like xda developers. Didn't replace screen but others reported it not working after replacing with original Samsung sc...
- Anonymous
- 19 Sep 2024
- wYx
Better performance such as s22 plus or s22 ultra