Samsung Galaxy A54
- D
- AnonD-1090716
- KuY
- 11 May 2023
Truely Samsung user, 10 May 2023-Again that your one and only "RTX bench" for 100... moreYou failed to provide evidence that the Qualcomm 7 gen 2 is faster in GPU/CPU ans better in ISP.
😂
Your other comparation is the same as the first page, you can't even show a proper page for comparation, same outdated bechmarks, have you seen my other comment?, the Exynos is similar in CPU but in GPU smiles ahead. Do i need to post more reliable pages claiming that the Exynos 2200 beated the Qualcomm 8 gem 2 in GPU?
The Qualcomm 7 gen 2 trails behind the Exynos 2200 specially in GPU, even the Qualcomm 8 gen 2 trails on front of Exynos in GPU RTX performance.
In antutu Exynos can score more than 950K still higher than your 7 gen 2+, has better ISP capabilities as well.
- m
- mightyshipppp
- 7Mu
- 11 May 2023
Spurs Popovich Fan, 10 May 2023get a Samsung A52, J7 2018, or a S10eWhy are you suggesting absolutely ancient stuff over this. At least with the A52s I understand because it’s actually still a really good phone but really the J7 2018? S10e? I sort of disagree with the buy an old flagship approach but at least get where they’re coming from, this is just you suggesting old midrangers over current mid rangers and flagships.
I’m looking at replacing my Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro I got in 2019 and I’m annoyed about probably ending up losing the headphone jack unless I go with something like the a52s or Zenfone 9 but replacing it a device even older than my current one would be so weird and it would seem strange to the person you’re responding to. Really J7 2018? Do you have no cares about app support or battery life or updates or security patches
- ?
- Anonymous
- mE0
- 10 May 2023
Not focusing on the same 20 opinions that are given by the same prats on the site, but something that's made me think strongly about the phone and the A34 is that, realistically, I have to ask: who is this phone really for in the end?
The A34 can hold its own in synthetic benchmarks whilst being more single core performant and, outside of missing HDR and Wifi-6 and eSIM support, is effectively the same phone for much less to begin with - unless you're set on these features I would just push people to the A34 and have that instead
Even then I struggle to understand Samsung's strategy at the midrange - it feels like a strange sabotage in which users are given less powerful chipsets relative to the competition (though this is not to say they aren't able to hold their own!) for stronger software support which, in my mind, represents Samsung's failure to properly understand the midrange - people will keep these phones for much longer, but still want to feel as though the phones are keeping up
Using a slower variant of UFS 2.2 compared with the A34, and adding in an Exynos chip that has known CPU throttling issues in lieu of that, doesn't make a lick of sense to me - and whilst these problems may not seem apparent to the end user now, come back in around 1-2 years and see how the phones held up and if my expectations have been bested
Adding onto this, I want to also propose that maybe we are seeing a potential convergence of both the A3x and A5x lines as they are effectively the same phones (4th gen) outside of hyperspecific niche features - if Samsung is able to cram in a performant Exynos chip without CPU throttling (or just use a strong Snapdragon 7 or Mediatek Dimensity 7 or 8 series CPU which will definitely turn heads, especially if it's optimised right!), add in UFS 3.1 storage with microSD expansion (I know this can be done since I am using an A90 5G with no plans to switch as of yet), add in a headphone jack and other fan faves, and that thing will sell as a jack of all trades phone
- A
- A54 King
- ri{
- 10 May 2023
Great phone for the price. Only thing everywhere I read about the A54, it states supports E sim but it does not.
- S
- Spurs Popovich Fan
- IbI
- 10 May 2023
Anonymous, 08 May 2023Pixel 7get a Samsung A52, J7 2018, or a S10e
- ?
- Anonymous
- XTA
- 10 May 2023
Truely Samsung user, 10 May 2023-Again that your one and only "RTX bench" for 100... moreif we dealing Samsung fab forget about benchmark forget about paper ..exynos is pure crap
- T
- Truely Samsung user
- 7k3
- 10 May 2023
AnonD-1090716, 10 May 2023What are you talking about?, check first the Geekbench 6 vu... moreBut the same Flagship Exynos 2200 fails to beat mid-range SD 7 Gen 2 in most of the benchmarks and applications:
https://tenzystech.com/soc-compare/samsung-exynos-2200-vs-qualcomm-snapdragon-7-plus-gen-2
https://infogram.com/snapdragon-7-plus-gen-2-cpu-benchmarks-1ho16vok8o0jx4n
Despite the flagship Exynos 2200 had a much bigger GPU its perforamce is more or less a tie in comparison with smaller midrange SD 7 Gen 2
https://infogram.com/snapdragon-7-plus-gen-2-gpu-benchmarks-1h7j4dvxpv9594n
- T
- Truely Samsung user
- 7k3
- 10 May 2023
AnonD-1090716, 10 May 2023"https://en.shiftdelete.net/samsung-exynos-2200-vs-qua... more-Again that your one and only "RTX bench" for 1001th time 😆😆
-You also again and again failed to provide evidence regarding flagship Exynos 2200 faster than SD 7 gen 2 in Geekbench 6. Oh wait you can't 😂
- D
- AnonD-1090716
- KuY
- 10 May 2023
Anonymous, 09 May 2023what are you talking about? RTX? dream on when android itse... moreWhat are you talking about?, check first the Geekbench 6 vulkan score of the Exynos 2200:
It gives 10150 points, even higher than the Qualcomm 8 gen 1+, lmao.
https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/compute/425615
The Exynos 2200 handling vulkan is the best in that part, lmao, apart if that some developers don't optimize games or apps to run on vulkan to approach the Exynos RnDa GPu performance.
- D
- AnonD-1090716
- KuY
- 10 May 2023
Darknoor, 09 May 2023Actually still A52sA52s only for the price and headphone jack, otherwise the A54 is a better choice.
- D
- AnonD-1090716
- KuY
- 10 May 2023
Truely Samsung user, 09 May 2023Then what these benches mean ? 😅
https://tenzystech.com/... more"https://en.shiftdelete.net/samsung-exynos-2200-vs-qualcomm-snapdragon-8-gen-2/"
And what this benchmark it mean for the latest Qualcomm high-end processor that is more powerful than the Qualcomm 7 gen 2?🤣😂
Again, check te updated Geekbench 6 CPU scores:
Exynos 2200 gets more than 1600 in single and suprass 4000 in multicore, not to talk that in capabilites Exynos demolishes your beloved Qualcomm 7 gen 2 in modem quality and ISP, and the GPU still even more ahead of it, since it beated the latest Qualcomm 8 gne 2 in that, the Qualcomm 7 gen 2+ is less powerful in GPU than the Qualcomm 8 gen2 and even less than the Exynos 2200.
- D
- AnonD-1090716
- KuY
- 10 May 2023
Truely Samsung user, 09 May 2023Quote: "Qualcomm 7 gen 2 trails behind Exynos in CPU/G... moreReply: "Qualcomm 7 gen 2 trails behind Exynos in CPU/GPU and Compute score in Geekbench 6."
Show proof for once please 😁
-All one can see is the midrange SD 7 gen 2 is faster than flagship Exynos 2200 in 99% of the cases and your last ditch effort on hanging onto that 1% that too in a midrange vs flagship is funny 😄
-If the comparison is based on Exynos 2200 vs SD 8 gen 2, all one can see the SD 8 gen 2 wiping the floor with Exynos 2200. In GPU tests alone, the SD 8 gen 2 is faster ranging from 40-87% throughout various tests.
Quote:
Qualcomm 8 gen 1+ vs Exynos 2200 in compute tests:
Qualcomm 8 gen 1+;
Vulkan score: 7167
Exynos 2200;
Vulkan score: 10150
You can check by yourself, lol.
All I can see that you're struggling to show real proof and not benchmarks that can be different when the chipset came out with the new phones:
https://versus.com/en/qualcomm-snapdragon-7-plus-gen-2-vs-samsung-exynos-2200
In most of the cases Qualcomm 7 gen 2 trails behind Exynos, in IA, ISP, GPU.
and memory amount dedicated to the chipset, lmao.🤣😂
- I
- IphoneFan
- m2A
- 09 May 2023
Anonymous, 09 May 2023Slow chip set and charger, forget itWhat are you talking about
- ?
- Anonymous
- uJy
- 09 May 2023
Slow chip set and charger, forget it
- ?
- Anonymous
- XTA
- 09 May 2023
AnonD-1090716, 08 May 2023" -You should first check the contents of the link be... morewhat are you talking about? RTX? dream on when android itself suck handling VULCAN
- D
- Darknoor
- 0v5
- 09 May 2023
Werner, 08 May 2023According to specs. Whitch one is best Samsung 53 or A54?Actually still A52s
- T
- Truely Samsung user
- 7k3
- 09 May 2023
AnonD-1090716, 08 May 2023Stop describing your comparations 😂
Qualcomm 7 gen 2 still... moreThen what these benches mean ? 😅
https://tenzystech.com/soc-compare/samsung-exynos-2200-vs-qualcomm-snapdragon-7-plus-gen-2
- T
- Truely Samsung user
- 7k3
- 09 May 2023
AnonD-1090716, 08 May 2023"
-You should first check the contents of the link be... moreQuote: "Qualcomm 7 gen 2 trails behind Exynos in CPU/GPU and Compute score in Geekbench 6."
Show proof for once please 😁
-All one can see is the midrange SD 7 gen 2 is faster than flagship Exynos 2200 in 99% of the cases and your last ditch effort on hanging onto that 1% that too in a midrange vs flagship is funny 😄
-If the comparison is based on Exynos 2200 vs SD 8 gen 2, all one can see the SD 8 gen 2 wiping the floor with Exynos 2200. In GPU tests alone, the SD 8 gen 2 is faster ranging from 40-87% throughout various tests.
https://nanoreview.net/en/soc-compare/samsung-exynos-2200-vs-qualcomm-snapdragon-8-gen-2
- D
- AnonD-1090716
- KuY
- 08 May 2023
Truely Samsung user, 08 May 2023Baseless and empty words 😄
Stop describing your comparations 😂
Qualcomm 7 gen 2 still behind Exynos 2200.