Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018)
- N
- Nishan
- J7K
- 12 Dec 2018
Hi guys I need your help.I'm ready to buy this mobile but I have doubt about performance.how is the camera quality?any lagging problem and mainly how is the battery performance? Pls help me guys I'm waiting for you reply thank you have a good day
- J
- Jojo
- r3a
- 11 Dec 2018
I understand Samsung is just trying to do something new and unique but they got this wrong. This device will definitely get poor sales. Common Samsung take your time. This device is not necessary. The a7 was just okay.
- ?
- Anonymous
- JEF
- 11 Dec 2018
Anonymous, 10 Dec 2018All cameras are so good, but price ...I know, i know. Cameras are good but 4? 3 are enough.
PS: yes, that crap price. I see it in my country at a very big price for a mid-range.
- ?
- Anonymous
- iyR
- 10 Dec 2018
Where is the IP68 that was implemented into the A series last year?
- ?
- Anonymous
- JEF
- 10 Dec 2018
Anonymous, 10 Dec 2018Two cameras, ok. Three cameras, ok, but four ?! The next 'i... moreAll cameras are so good, but price ...
- ?
- Anonymous
- JEF
- 10 Dec 2018
Two cameras, ok. Three cameras, ok, but four ?! The next 'inovative' Samsung phone will have 1000 cameras. 3 cameras are ENOUGH!!
- M
- Meatlover
- Dkh
- 10 Dec 2018
Elmahrouky, 07 Dec 2018Did A9 2018 came with plastic frame like A7 2018?No, its aluminium
- S
- Steve
- mAP
- 09 Dec 2018
V30
1. Cheaper
2. Better SD 835 vs a poor 660
3. Better better camera
4. 2k display
A9 - 250-300$ phone
- H
- HEMAL PATHIRANA
- t0L
- 09 Dec 2018
HEMAL PATHIRANA, 09 Dec 2018VERY TRUE......expensive failure.......Quantitative factors, price increased.........qualitative factors, customer satisfaction decreased........
- H
- HEMAL PATHIRANA
- t0L
- 09 Dec 2018
AndY, 09 Dec 2018Tried it...not impressed. Huge slab with big bezel, low vol... moreVERY TRUE......expensive failure.......
- D
- AnonD-621054
- yp1
- 09 Dec 2018
A9 totally waste the reason is no front flash A7 & A9 both have same camera quality but only difference Telephoto lens performancecis little difference price A9 36K A7 is better choice
- A
- AndY
- pBI
- 09 Dec 2018
Tried it...not impressed. Huge slab with big bezel, low volume speaker and 3 bad cameras from what i could tell from my test in the shop. And not very fast too. Complete expensive failure, waiting for flat screen S10.
- ?
- Anonymous
- XMu
- 08 Dec 2018
Please tests performance
- b
- babak
- 6tI
- 08 Dec 2018
hdx, 07 Dec 2018how come you guys can't find out that there is definitely f... moreit has fast charging but its not near to 10w too so because of that even with fast charge the phone will charge completely between 3 to 4 hours
- ?
- Anonymous
- xHH
- 08 Dec 2018
Will we see 5 or 6 camera or something next year? And then what we know the back of the phones will be coverd with bunch of cameras. Tried the camera on the display phone and less crisp than my iphone 7. Lol
- ?
- Anonymous
- rpN
- 07 Dec 2018
the camera on this phone are simply horrible , the worst i 'v ever seen don't get be fooled .
- h
- hdx
- wre
- 07 Dec 2018
how come you guys can't find out that there is definitely fast charging available on this phone. lol. sometimes people on internet are the most funny one.
- D
- AnonD-621054
- ypY
- 06 Dec 2018
no front flash no fast charge same camera like A7 price 36K definitely waste of money price at least 25K success other wise monthly price cut soon....
- ?
- Anonymous
- bJb
- 05 Dec 2018
No wireless charging, front flash, slow charging is a big disappointment with the ugly black front bezel that always black without any other color option n the USB port should be on top for comfort holding when charging