Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018) - User opinions and reviews

S
Sai
tTg
11 Oct 2018

Features are best but what is the cost is issue as all other mobiles are getting with less cost with all these features except quad camera which is not so useful / essential for all

Reply

BrokenLawShaw
6P5
11 Oct 2018

Headphone jack -- CHECK
MicroSD card slot -- CHECK
SuperAMOLED screen -- CHECK
A good 3800mAh battery capacity -- CHECK
4 Camera innovation -- CHECK
24MP front camera -- CHECK

Now that's a good phone to buy... Well done Samsung. World's first quad camera phone done correctly.

Reply

?
Anonymous
Sqx
11 Oct 2018

It's so tiresome with these big phones. 150+ cm tall is too big. Every new phone seems interesting at first, but then you see the dimensions is so big. Sad to see that only Sony and Apple are making "compact" phones.

Reply

D
AnonD-621054
ypc
11 Oct 2018

price is 51K never success

Reply

m
macky2green
Sq6
11 Oct 2018

Could have been near-perfect for me, but... IP68, where art thou? :(

Reply

D
AnonD-632062
Hx1
11 Oct 2018

Not bad. Not bad at all.

Super AMOLED screen. Large 3800 mAh battery. Powerful SnapDragon 660.

128 GB of Internal storage with 6 or 8 GB RAM! That's awesome for a mid-ranger.

3.5 mm headphone jack and a microSD card slot. Nice gradient colour options too (Lemonde Blue looks sweet and unique).

Great Camera combination. Looks very promising with large primary resolution and f1.7 aperture. Although the Depth Sensor is probably just there to make up the numbers. And the Telephoto sensor makes it even more redundant. Selfie camera seems good too.

My only gripe is they should have gone for the centrally placed camera alignment, like traditional Samsung design. Also, they should price it right too.

Still, if Samsung is willing to take such a radical approach with a mid-ranger, just imagine how the S10 will turn out! Exciting Times!

Reply

y
yamyam
7Xp
11 Oct 2018

Around $620

Reply

R
Rahat197537
X}g
11 Oct 2018

I think Google forgot to take this camera and they did with single camera . Samsung is innovative but not a good player . Theirs marketing is just great nothing else . $600 for Sd 660 . Why we need 4 cameras ? Nonsense . Cameras are priority but we can't blindly buy . Nowadays Sd660 with 6/8Gb with 128 Gb is under $350 with very good cameras . Why they didn't that thing in their flagship ? Why ? Just marketing is everything for Samsung .

Reply

M
MHanz
uJA
11 Oct 2018

A pity it isn't on SD 710

24Mp main sensor is a joke they should have stuck with 12MP 1.4um pixels but then again that damages their near flagship sales that's the reason.

Reply

F
Furiounx
P$W
11 Oct 2018

Whatever happened to the IP rating on Samsung Galaxy A phones? That was one of the most iconic features of the lineup.

Reply

J
JaCk
akH
11 Oct 2018

NSF MunDowsi, 09 Oct 2018Really it is a great smart phone in the world, because it's... moreOnly one camera is enough to take good quality picture. Google pixel 2XL is an example, no1 camera phone in the world

Reply

F
Firefox
L1q
11 Oct 2018

Either telephoto or wide angel camera is enough to collect depth info & create bokeh effect. Separate depth camera is given just to claim it a four camera setup. They should use a B/W camera instead of depth camera for better low light photography.

Reply

1
120
MuJ
11 Oct 2018

120° field of view, that's extremely wide, wow. But if it's has fish eye distortion then it's not good

Reply

S
Swap
w4d
11 Oct 2018

I am just wondering why Samsung is not adding the Infrared port in their latest phones. We users end up paying hefty amount and even some basic features are missing. Samsung kindly consider this request before launching new products.