Samsung Galaxy Core II
- D
- AnonD-256421
- 2Tw
- 27 Apr 2014
*Nice rectangular design against 2013's galaxies,
*low Ram... atleast 768mb of ram should be there,
*try to make it in 2 versions...4gb and 8gb storage,
*2ndry camera also should be atleast 2mp.
*Price is high against the specifications... need to drop the price. & try to make it a mid range phone.
- j
- jidotonii
- N9@
- 26 Apr 2014
nice one samsung but ur RAM sucks
- D
- AnonD-103438
- rAQ
- 26 Apr 2014
512 mb ram.....deal breaker..
- D
- AnonD-258138
- Sbn
- 26 Apr 2014
Very bad specs, and why 512mb of ram the original core had 1gig of ram
- ?
- Anonymous
- t1$
- 26 Apr 2014
Very low RAM and same boring design. Very bad phone. Don't waste your money on this phone
- p
- pravin
- GR}
- 26 Apr 2014
ram was to small
- a
- anuj111
- 7t8
- 26 Apr 2014
not impressive phone.only 512 mb ram,5mp camera.flop
- ?
- Anonymous
- GRT
- 26 Apr 2014
low RAM low internal memory from core 1 ....
- M
- Manikandan
- uv}
- 26 Apr 2014
Operation Will be slow. because 512 MB RAM.
- D
- AnonD-237024
- 9Ea
- 25 Apr 2014
Looks to be a good mid ranger :-)
- h
- hadi
- RmC
- 25 Apr 2014
512mb ram and run with 4.4,s3 with 1gb run with 4.3,or s3 mini run with 4.1 l:thank you samsung:P
- S
- SeF
- w0P
- 25 Apr 2014
512MB ram for a v4.x device is a joke, what the heck samsung couldn't U give this at least 1GB? it's the standard among mid-entry level devices of this time -_-
- ?
- Anonymous
- ut0
- 25 Apr 2014
Its strange. How can samsung decrease storage, and RAM memory instead of increasing? "Dumbsung"
- V
- Vikram
- XNt
- 25 Apr 2014
Yuk design and specs
- j
- jamu
- v0q
- 25 Apr 2014
Apurba Bayen, 25 Apr 2014RAM is too low. It cannot be a hit in the market. At least ... moreYeah. And it is also like the Samsung Galaxy Ace Style with poor Ram and an Android 4.4 Kitkat... It is very dissappointing. Right??
- A
- Apurba Bayen
- vwj
- 25 Apr 2014
RAM is too low. It cannot be a hit in the market. At least 768MB is expected.