Samsung Galaxy Fame S6810
MORE PICTURES

Samsung Galaxy Fame S6810

User opinions and reviews

Sort by:

  • D
  • AnonD-78094
  • vaP
  • 07 Feb 2013

Poor battery

    • D
    • AnonD-87833
    • uum
    • 07 Feb 2013

    Same specs as Galaxy Ace Plus but this has jelly bean! Why hasnt samsung released jelly bean for ace plus yet?! Atleast a leak that can be flashed would really help!

      • e
      • emon
      • uNV
      • 07 Feb 2013

      samsung plz add Balck Colour in this phone plzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

        • D
        • AnonD-110034
        • pkd
        • 06 Feb 2013

        Please add GPU and Chipset , and it'll be perfect !!!

          • w
          • waqas
          • KIc
          • 06 Feb 2013

          samsung this model just missing gpu and ram must 786 like your newly samsung galaxy young 6310 because models run android jellybean and after every android updates devices need more and more ram for new features like google now

            • ?
            • Anonymous
            • SaE
            • 06 Feb 2013

            Anonymous, 05 Feb 2013even $200 is too much for this specs, resolution is too low... moreyes man u rightly said about the pricing ans all, i do nt know why others say 230 dollars for this crap, even s duos has lost its price to 230 dollars now, so how can this be 230 dollars and at 230 dollars even s duos sale is not a good hit for smsung, therefore they are bringing this one with reduced price and to create a gap bw s duos and this one

              • A
              • Anshu
              • rJ9
              • 06 Feb 2013

              Plz release i cant wait for this phone

                • r
                • rinki
                • utB
                • 06 Feb 2013

                when will it launch in india?

                  • I
                  • I love Samsung
                  • TfP
                  • 06 Feb 2013

                  Samsung Plz Add Adreno 200gpu in this device otherwise superb mobile....We need gpu in this mobile

                    • ?
                    • Anonymous
                    • Nv9
                    • 06 Feb 2013

                    The let down is the ram and the low ppi, 200ppi would've been good. But the success of this phone depends on its low price.

                      • ?
                      • Anonymous
                      • ITV
                      • 06 Feb 2013

                      Highly dissapointed. Guys come out with a new design.

                        • D
                        • AnonD-94494
                        • utq
                        • 06 Feb 2013

                        This one will replace the Samsung Galaxy Ace.
                        So if the Price is right i think it's a good phone considering it's specs.
                        But again it's the price that will matter to everyone.

                          • J
                          • Jon
                          • Mfx
                          • 06 Feb 2013

                          Nice entry level phone, kind of successor of Galaxy mini 2. Everything great, will sell very well if less than 200 dollars. Not everybody needs a S3.

                            • D
                            • AnonD-86592
                            • vbZ
                            • 06 Feb 2013

                            Again, Samsung has not got it right. This is just an enhanced version of galaxy Y by offering 1GHz processor & 512 MB ram. Actually the Young should have had 512 Mb ram as the screen size was small & this must be with the 768 MB one. But nowadays in the Dual, Quad & Octa Cores coming around the single core is of no use. Even if this is targeted towards budget consumers Samsung should have given at least a dual core processor.

                              • D
                              • AnonD-103898
                              • a3H
                              • 06 Feb 2013

                              1GHz for an android cellphone !ok everybody should be ready for coping with lags ! 1300 mah for an android cellphone!ok everybody should be ready for carrying charger with themselves even in bathroom !low pixel density is another problem .

                                • D
                                • AnonD-98316
                                • t}U
                                • 06 Feb 2013

                                [deleted post]Yup I agree with You Bro......!!!!!

                                  • D
                                  • AnonD-98316
                                  • t}U
                                  • 06 Feb 2013

                                  Nipun, 06 Feb 2013256K colors oh no..... not good . this phone need 16m color... morewhy you dont go for Samsung Galaxy S III mini,it have 16.m colours & 720p Video..hahaha.. LOL .. Galaxy Fame is a Low End Phone Damet

                                    • D
                                    • AnonD-98316
                                    • t}U
                                    • 06 Feb 2013

                                    Superb Phone For Samsung...., It Will be my Next Phone,If Its Video Shooting Capacxity 720p HD Then It is must better than Galaxy Ace2 or Galaxy Siii mini, How ever i expect It will be Lunch In India & price expected Under 12k,(230 USD),Thank you Samsung,Mobile..

                                      • N
                                      • Nipun
                                      • XNp
                                      • 06 Feb 2013

                                      256K colors oh no..... not good . this phone need 16m colors....What the hell is wrong with you Samsung

                                        • v
                                        • vaibhav
                                        • XuS
                                        • 05 Feb 2013

                                        AnonD-19126, 05 Feb 2013Ram and the battery informations must be corrected 768mb ra... moredude that is for galaxy young...galaxy frame has the same specs as described above!!