Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo
MORE PICTURES

Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo

User opinions and reviews

Sort by:

  • ?
  • Anonymous
  • Hkq
  • 10 Jan 2014

Boring modal

    • ?
    • Anonymous
    • utV
    • 09 Jan 2014

    The same chipset running XOLO model costs a sensible 10k only in India, with the arrival of this the formers price might shoot to 20k, that is how shitty & double fold the money company is making with its recent 5 years brand raise.

    I hope this guys will sell it for the least 13-15k

      • L
      • LAUDTEC
      • 7xu
      • 09 Jan 2014

      how this phone compete with HuaWei and ZTE phone?very low specifications,i prefer Huawei 3X,it is strong,lol

        • H
        • Hahaa
        • 49x
        • 09 Jan 2014

        Wow better than Galaxy note 3 lol

          • ?
          • Anonymous
          • fkQ
          • 09 Jan 2014

          Why not android 4.4 ?

            • D
            • AnonD-194481
            • Li3
            • 08 Jan 2014

            the same look. the same processor. what an innovation!

              • e
              • elsee
              • vaN
              • 08 Jan 2014

              Too expensive for a very simple upgrade

                • D
                • AnonD-149767
                • PdL
                • 08 Jan 2014

                Only difference is that its now a quadcore device... From a SOC manufacturer I haven't heard from in a long time.. Broadcomm.... This is a small upgrade over the original grand..

                  • D
                  • AnonD-210852
                  • vaQ
                  • 08 Jan 2014

                  Grand Duos is a better choice

                    • D
                    • AnonD-222442
                    • t1$
                    • 08 Jan 2014

                    Samsung will loose its brand value if they launch this device with this spec for that price. Its totally nonsense and stupid.

                      • D
                      • AnonD-172592
                      • B}v
                      • 08 Jan 2014

                      samsung back in black.neo very expencive .basic grand was better than neo

                        • D
                        • AnonD-13309
                        • tev
                        • 08 Jan 2014

                        ~187 ppi pixel low density,no 4g badddddddddddd

                          • D
                          • AnonD-15868
                          • PxW
                          • 08 Jan 2014

                          why the samsung again & again making the same crap....

                            • D
                            • AnonD-222353
                            • 2ZY
                            • 08 Jan 2014

                            [deleted post]You are big Spam in this earth.

                              • D
                              • AnonD-222353
                              • 2ZY
                              • 08 Jan 2014

                              Very low ppi.
                              Very bad phone.

                                • ?
                                • Anonymous
                                • vbU
                                • 08 Jan 2014

                                specs of galaxy grand neo is same like galaxy grand...same screen ppi internal memory only 5 mp camera instead of 8 mp and video recording is 720 instead of 1080 p....price above 20000 is not worth.....

                                  • o
                                  • oktav
                                  • vfx
                                  • 08 Jan 2014

                                  Another spam zzz wvga for 5inch screen

                                    • s
                                    • siren
                                    • uut
                                    • 08 Jan 2014

                                    Why is samsung putting old material n making new phones with same design....not worth it.