Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo
- ?
- Anonymous
- utV
- 09 Jan 2014
The same chipset running XOLO model costs a sensible 10k only in India, with the arrival of this the formers price might shoot to 20k, that is how shitty & double fold the money company is making with its recent 5 years brand raise.
I hope this guys will sell it for the least 13-15k
- L
- LAUDTEC
- 7xu
- 09 Jan 2014
how this phone compete with HuaWei and ZTE phone?very low specifications,i prefer Huawei 3X,it is strong,lol
- H
- Hahaa
- 49x
- 09 Jan 2014
Wow better than Galaxy note 3 lol
- ?
- Anonymous
- fkQ
- 09 Jan 2014
Why not android 4.4 ?
- D
- AnonD-194481
- Li3
- 08 Jan 2014
the same look. the same processor. what an innovation!
- e
- elsee
- vaN
- 08 Jan 2014
Too expensive for a very simple upgrade
- D
- AnonD-149767
- PdL
- 08 Jan 2014
Only difference is that its now a quadcore device... From a SOC manufacturer I haven't heard from in a long time.. Broadcomm.... This is a small upgrade over the original grand..
- D
- AnonD-210852
- vaQ
- 08 Jan 2014
Grand Duos is a better choice
- D
- AnonD-222442
- t1$
- 08 Jan 2014
Samsung will loose its brand value if they launch this device with this spec for that price. Its totally nonsense and stupid.
- D
- AnonD-172592
- B}v
- 08 Jan 2014
samsung back in black.neo very expencive .basic grand was better than neo
- D
- AnonD-13309
- tev
- 08 Jan 2014
~187 ppi pixel low density,no 4g badddddddddddd
- D
- AnonD-15868
- PxW
- 08 Jan 2014
why the samsung again & again making the same crap....
- D
- AnonD-222353
- 2ZY
- 08 Jan 2014
Very low ppi.
Very bad phone.
- ?
- Anonymous
- vbU
- 08 Jan 2014
specs of galaxy grand neo is same like galaxy grand...same screen ppi internal memory only 5 mp camera instead of 8 mp and video recording is 720 instead of 1080 p....price above 20000 is not worth.....
- o
- oktav
- vfx
- 08 Jan 2014
Another spam zzz wvga for 5inch screen
- s
- siren
- uut
- 08 Jan 2014
Why is samsung putting old material n making new phones with same design....not worth it.