Samsung Galaxy J7 V
MORE PICTURES

Samsung Galaxy J7 V

User opinions and reviews

Sort by:

  • ?
  • Anonymous
  • Qbk
  • 13 Aug 2017

Anonymous, 05 Aug 2017You do realize that this phone is not a mid range mid phone... moreAnd do you realize also that any J7 series are classfied as 'Mid-to-Upper' class smartphones. The J3 and J5 will just be low-end to middle class topping to what the early J7 specs were.

    How many J7s are there??? Don't Samsung have any other name for thier mid-rangers?

      • ?
      • Anonymous
      • UD{
      • 05 Aug 2017

      anonymous, 20 Jul 2017embarassing really embarassing lost the dignity of j7 series You do realize that this phone is not a mid range mid phone?
      It is meant to be low end phone for other consumers/ buyers

        • ?
        • Anonymous
        • XHf
        • 03 Aug 2017

        I'm running the J7 SM-728P model, and I must say its feels sluggish to use - really disappointed when it comes with a faster CPU, supposed to be better than all the other J7 models - Hey Samsung - what gives?!?!?

          • ?
          • Anonymous
          • gML
          • 02 Aug 2017

          What is the meaning of giving a 8 mp rear camera ?? All J5 & J7 series phone have 13 mp at the back. I really can't understand samsung. Except csmera all other features are nice.

            • D
            • AnonD-688597
            • Kic
            • 01 Aug 2017

            Samsung J7 :V

              • a
              • av
              • 2W1
              • 31 Jul 2017

              this model for India?

                • s
                • sreeraj
                • yp1
                • 25 Jul 2017

                removable battery and nano sim. samsung introduce change

                  • ?
                  • Anonymous
                  • t7}
                  • 25 Jul 2017

                  Atleast it has removable battery sp thats a plus.

                    • ?
                    • Anonymous
                    • 7Xt
                    • 24 Jul 2017

                    its a battery life j7

                      • D
                      • Device man
                      • q$f
                      • 21 Jul 2017

                      flower, 19 Jul 2017j7, j7 2016, j7 2017, j7 prime, j7 max, j7 pro and now j7 v... moreIt's a good phone compared to all of the j7 phones and they should many a j7 v max and a j7 v chrome edition

                        • a
                        • anonymous
                        • Nvx
                        • 20 Jul 2017

                        embarassing really embarassing
                        lost the dignity of j7 series

                          • D
                          • AnonD-441601
                          • Lfu
                          • 20 Jul 2017

                          Nothing special for 240 its really expensive

                            If Samsung had used the SD625 in J7 (2017) would be a lot better. But no, they had to use their in-house chip from last year. By the way, this look like a J7 (2016) with way better chipset and downgraded camera.

                              J7 has list its dignity, after five pro max 2017 etc introduced, to hookwing customers. Only 16+32+64 internal and Amoled to Lcd screen playing around. We customers should give Sammy a lesson, each set costing 300+ to 450$° it's mockery!

                                • D
                                • AnonD-682682
                                • gKq
                                • 19 Jul 2017

                                OMG! Same shit,difrerent day!

                                  • f
                                  • flower
                                  • 0nD
                                  • 19 Jul 2017

                                  j7, j7 2016, j7 2017, j7 prime, j7 max, j7 pro and now j7 v
                                  someone stop 'em