Galaxy Mega 6.3 vs. Ascend Mate: Shadows of giants
Shadows of giants
Screen
With a 6+ inch diagonal, we're talking big screens. While the 720p resolution isn't up to some people's standards, it's quite enough for the mid-range devices that the Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3 and Huawei Ascend Mate clearly are.
A look at the Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3 and Huawei Ascend Mate displays
The pixel density is 241ppi for the Mate and 233ppi for the Mega 6.3 (which has 0.2" bigger screen). Graphics, even small type, are fairly smooth especially when you consider that you hold the bigger screen further away from your eyes. Sure, it's not as sharp as the latest 1080p screens, but those are impossible to get at this price.
Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3 and Huawei Ascend Mate screens under a microscope
We should mention that despite the bigger physical size of the displays, the interface isn't "bigger" than what you'd get on a 4.5" 720p screen - you still get five shortcuts per row of the screen and many apps will render the same on 720p screens despite the difference in screen size.
Both screens have pleasing colors, but the Huawei Ascend Mate offers a slider to adjust the color temperature of the screen (you can go from warm to cold, depending on your preference). The Samsung Galaxy S4 has screen color adjustments too, but Samsung decided not to share this particular feature with the Mega 6.3.
In terms of viewing angles, the Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3 is very good with only the slightest contrast shift. The Huawei Ascend Mate's screen showed a more noticeable distortion at an angle.
Huawei has put a bright screen on the Ascend Mate, it's been a while since we saw a big screen break the 700nit barrier. The black levels aren't great, but they are still better than what the Sony Xperia Z had to offer and the Mate's screen has noticeably better contrast (because of its high brightness).
The Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3 screen isn't particularly bright, in fact it barely beats the Super AMOLED screen of the Galaxy S4. The Mega 6.3 has very good contrast though, a hair more than the iPhone 5 and close the LG Optimus G.
Display test | 50% brightness | 100% brightness | ||||
Black, cd/m2 | White, cd/m2 | Black, cd/m2 | White, cd/m2 | |||
Sony Xperia ZL | - | - | - | 0.44 | 575 | 1294 |
Sony Xperia Z | - | - | - | 0.70 | 492 | 705 |
Huawei Ascend Mate | 0.23 | 222 | 982 | 0.67 | 711 | 1053 |
Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3 | 0.12 | 160 | 1364 | 0.32 | 440 | 1379 |
HTC One | 0.13 | 205 | 1580 | 0.42 | 647 | 1541 |
HTC Butterfly | 0.14 | 173 | 1200 | 0.45 | 501 | 1104 |
Samsung I9505 Galaxy S4 | 0 | 201 | ∞ | 0 | 404 | ∞ |
Oppo Find 5 | 0.17 | 176 | 1123 | 0.51 | 565 | 1107 |
Samsung N7100 Galaxy Note II | 0 | 215 | ∞ | 0 | 402 | ∞ |
LG Optimus G Pro | - | - | - | 0.41 | 611 | 1489 |
Nokia Lumia 920 | - | - | - | 0.48 | 513 | 1065 |
LG Optimus G | 0.14 | 197 | 1445 | 0.33 | 417 | 1438 |
Apple iPhone 5 | 0.13 | 200 | 1490 | 0.48 | 640 | 1320 |
The screen glass on the Huawei Ascend Mate is very reflective though, so even with its much higher brightness it couldn't top the Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3 in terms of sunlight legibility. Both score towards the bottom of the pack.
Sunlight contrast ratio
-
Nokia 808 PureView
4.698 -
Apple iPhone 5
3.997 -
Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III
3.419 -
Samsung Galaxy S4
3.352 -
Samsung Omnia W
3.301 -
Samsung Galaxy S
3.155 -
Nokia N9
3.069 -
Samsung Galaxy Note
2.970 -
HTC One S
2.901 -
Samsung Galaxy S II
2.832 -
Samsung Galaxy S II Plus
2.801 -
Huawei Ascend P1
2.655 -
Nokia Lumia 900
2.562 -
HTC One
2.504 -
Sony Xperia Z
2.462 -
Samsung Galaxy S III mini
2.422 -
Motorola RAZR i
2.366 -
Sony Xperia ZL
2.352 -
Samsung Galaxy Note II
2.307 -
Apple iPhone 4S
2.269 -
HTC One X
2.158 -
Nokia N8
2.144 -
Oppo Find 5
2.088 -
BlackBerry Z10
2.051 -
Apple iPhone 4
2.016 -
Sony Ericsson Xperia ray
1.955 -
Samsung Galaxy Camera
1.938 -
Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3
1.913 -
HTC Butterfly
1.873 -
Huawei Ascend Mate
1.845 -
Sony Xperia V
1.792 -
Sony Xperia U
1.758 -
LG Optimus 4X HD
1.691 -
HTC One V
1.685 -
LG Optimus Vu
1.680 -
HTC Desire V
1.646 -
LG Optimus G Pro
1.552 -
LG Optimus 3D
1.542 -
Nokia Asha 302
1.537 -
Nokia Lumia 610
1.432 -
Gigabyte GSmart G1355
1.361 -
HTC Desire C
1.300 -
LG Optimus L7
1.269 -
LG Optimus L9
1.227 -
Meizu MX
1.221 -
Sony Xperia E dual
1.203 -
Samsung Galaxy Pocket
1.180 -
Sony Xperia tipo
1.166 -
Samsung Galaxy mini 2
1.114
The screens on both phablets are extra sensitive and can be used even with gloves on. The Galaxy Mega 6.3 goes a step further and can detect your finger hovering above the screen, which triggers some S Pen-like actions.
The Huawei Ascent Mate earns back some points for packing Gorilla Glass protection, there's no mention of scratch-resistance for the Mega 6.3 screen.
Winner: Better scratch protection and higher brightness is how the Huawei Ascend Mate won this round. The viewing angles and the black levels could have been better, but overall it's a good screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3 has a slightly bigger screen, but not by much. It can take comfort in having the better contrast, viewing angles and sunlight legibility, but not by a big enough margin for a win here.
Battery life
Big devices, big batteries. Or in the case of the Huawei Ascend Mate, bigger battery. A whopping 4,050mAh against "just" 3,200mAh of the Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3. Both have big screens, which will draw a lot of power (we're guessing the 0.2" difference won't matter much), but very different chipsets.
The Snapdragon 400 that powers the Galaxy Mega 6.3 has proven to be very power-efficient, while the HiSilicon K3V2 inside the Ascend Mate has yet to make a name for itself.
The first test, 3G talk time, shows a massive advantage for the Ascend Mate - it's our new champion, finally dethroning the Motorola RAZR MAXX. Intel deserves some of the credit here too for supplying the modem the Mate uses.
The Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3 doesn't do too bad either with 20 hours of talk time. In fact, if we adjust for the difference in battery capacity, the two phablets score exactly the same. That's the price of vanity (and thin profile), we guess.
Talk time
-
Huawei Ascend Mate
25:12 -
Motorola RAZR MAXX (ICS)
21:18 -
LG Optimus G Pro
20:45 -
Motorola DROID RAZR MAXX
20:24 -
Motorola RAZR i
20:07 -
BlackBerry Q10
20:00 -
Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3
19:54 -
Sony Xperia SP
19:49 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
18:03 -
Samsung Galaxy Note II N7100
16:57 -
Sony Xperia Z
16:03 -
LG Optimus G
15:30 -
Sony Xperia ZL
15:22 -
Nokia Lumia 720
15:17 -
Nokia Lumia 620
14:17 -
Oppo Find 5
14:17 -
Google Nexus 4
14:17 -
HTC One
13:38 -
HTC One X+
13:31 -
Nokia Lumia 520
13:33 -
Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos
12:45 -
Huawei Ascend P1
12:30 -
Sony Xperia L
12:30 -
HTC Butterfly
12:18 -
Samsung Galaxy Note
12:14 -
Samsung I8530 Galaxy Beam
11:58 -
Samsung Galaxy Premier
11:30 -
Asus Padfone 2
11:20 -
HTC Droid DNA
11:07 -
HTC Windows Phone 8X
11:07 -
Samsung Wave 3 S8600
11:07 -
Samsung I9105 Galaxy S II Plus
11:06 -
HTC Desire X
11:03 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
11:01 -
HTC One X (AT&T, LTE)
10:35 -
Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III
10:20 -
Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III (JB)
10:15 -
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 2
10:03 -
HTC One V
10:00 -
Meizu MX 4-core
10:00 -
Samsung Galaxy Express
10:00 -
HTC One X
9:57 -
HTC One S
9:42 -
Samsung I9103 Galaxy R
9:40 -
HTC Sensation XL
9:30 -
Nokia Lumia 810
9:05 -
Nokia Lumia 710
9:05 -
Acer CloudMobile S500
9:05 -
Motorola Atrix HD
9:04 -
HTC Vivid
9:02 -
Nokia Lumia 920
8:56 -
Nokia Lumia 610
8:51 -
HTC Rhyme
8:48 -
Apple iPhone 5
8:42 -
LG Optimus 3D Max P720
8:42 -
Sony Ericsson Xperia neo V
8:41 -
Meizu MX
8:39 -
Samsung Galaxy S II
8:35 -
Samsung Galaxy S Duos
8:28 -
Nokia Lumia 800
8:25 -
Samsung Galaxy Nexus
8:23 -
Nokia Lumia 510
8:22 -
Samsung Galaxy Fame
8:21 -
BlackBerry Z10
8:20 -
HTC Desire V
8:20 -
Samsung Captivate Glide
8:20 -
Sony Xperia T
8:15 -
HTC Rezound (LTE)
8:10 -
Samsung Galaxy Note (LTE)
8:02 -
LG Optimus Vu
7:57 -
LG Optimus 4X HD
7:41 -
Apple iPhone 4S
7:41 -
Samsung i937 Focus S
7:25 -
HTC Evo 4G LTE (LTE)
7:21 -
Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G
7:14 -
Nokia Lumia 820
7:09 -
Sony Xperia acro S
7:09 -
Samsung Rugby Smart I847
7:09 -
Sony Ericsson Xperia Pro
6:57 -
Nokia N9
6:57 -
HTC Radar
6:53 -
Samsung Galaxy Ace Duos
6:53 -
BlackBerry Curve 9380
6:52 -
Sony Xperia E dual
6:42 -
Samsung Galaxy S III mini
6:22 -
Samsung Galaxy Pocket
5:54 -
Nokia Lumia 900 for AT&T (LTE)
5:53 -
Sony Xperia ion LTE
5:52 -
Sony Xperia P
5:33 -
Nokia 808 PureView
5:16 -
LG Nitro HD (LTE)
5:16 -
HTC Titan II (LTE)
5:10 -
BlackBerry Bold 9790
5:00 -
Pantech Burst
4:46
The web browser test was a surprise - both the Mega 6.3 and Mate died within a minute of each other. With a time of 8 hours and 17 minutes, they place in the Top 10. The Ascend Mate has 25% more battery capacity and a slightly smaller screen. The screen is brighter though and the Cortex-A9s are usually less power-efficient than Krait (especially when it's 4 against 2), which explains the even result despite different batteries.
Web browsing
-
HTC One
9:58 -
Apple iPhone 5
9:56 -
Motorola RAZR MAXX (ICS)
9:12 -
Apple iPad mini
9:05 -
Samsung Galaxy Note II N7100
8:48 -
BlackBerry Q10
8:42 -
Nokia Lumia 810
8:20 -
Asus Padfone 2
8:20 -
Huawei Ascend Mate
8:17 -
Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3
8:17 -
Nokia Lumia 610
8:01 -
HTC One X+
7:56 -
Sony Xperia E dual
7:42 -
Samsung Galaxy S III mini
7:38 -
Nokia Lumia 720
7:37 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
7:24 -
Motorola DROID RAZR MAXX
7:23 -
HTC Radar
7:17 -
Nokia Lumia 520
7:15 -
Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos
7:09 -
Samsung Galaxy Express
7:09 -
Motorola RAZR i
7:06 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
6:58 -
Apple iPhone 4S
6:56 -
HTC One V
6:49 -
LG Optimus G Pro
6:40 -
Samsung I9105 Galaxy S II Plus
6:40 -
Sony Xperia L
6:40 -
HTC Droid DNA
6:40 -
Samsung Galaxy Premier
6:40 -
Motorola Atrix HD
6:40 -
BlackBerry Curve 9380
6:40 -
Sony Xperia Z
6:37 -
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 2
6:35 -
BlackBerry Z10
6:27 -
Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III (JB)
6:27 -
HTC Butterfly
6:24 -
Sony Xperia SP
6:18 -
Samsung i937 Focus S
6:15 -
Nokia Lumia 510
6:13 -
Sony Xperia ZL
6:04 -
HTC Windows Phone 8X
6:01 -
Sony Xperia ion LTE
5:56 -
Samsung Galaxy Fame
5:55 -
Samsung Rugby Smart I847
5:53 -
Pantech Burst
5:51 - Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G
5:45 -
HTC Desire V
5:44 -
HTC Evo 4G LTE
5:41 -
Nokia Lumia 920
5:40 -
Samsung Wave 3 S8600
5:34 -
Oppo Find 5
5:33 -
Sony Xperia T
5:33 -
Samsung Captivate Glide
5:33 -
Samsung I8530 Galaxy Beam
5:28 -
Samsung Galaxy Note LTE
5:24 -
Samsung Galaxy S Duos
5:23 -
HTC Sensation XL
5:20 -
Meizu MX 4-core
5:19 -
Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III
5:17 -
Sony Xperia acro S
5:16 -
HTC Rezound
5:16 -
HTC Desire X
5:16 -
LG Optimus G
5:15 -
HTC Rhyme
5:08 -
Samsung I9103 Galaxy R
5:07 -
HTC One X (AT&T)
5:03 -
Sony Ericsson Xperia Pro
4:50 -
LG Optimus Vu
4:49 -
HTC Vivid
4:46 -
Samsung Galaxy Ace Duos
4:45 -
Meizu MX
4:35 -
Google Nexus 4
4:34 -
Nokia N9
4:33 -
Acer CloudMobile S500
4:32 -
Nokia Lumia 820
4:24 -
Samsung Galaxy S II
4:24 -
Sony Ericsson Xperia neo V
4:20 -
HTC One X
4:18 -
Nokia 808 PureView
4:14 -
LG Optimus 3D Max P720
4:10 -
Nokia Lumia 900 for AT&T
4:10 -
Nokia Lumia 800
4:07 -
HTC Titan II (LTE)
4:05 -
HTC One S
4:03 -
BlackBerry Bold 9790
4:02 -
LG Nitro HD
4:00 -
LG Optimus 4X HD
3:59 -
Sony Xperia P
3:59 -
Nokia Lumia 710
3:51 -
Nokia Lumia 620
3:50 -
Samsung Galaxy Pocket
3:47 -
Samsung Galaxy Note
3:35 -
Huawei Ascend P1
3:23 -
Samsung Galaxy Nexus
3:01
The video playback test was no contest - the Huawei Ascend Mate posted a nearly 50% better result than the Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3. The brighter screen didn't hurt the Mate too much, so it's either a more efficient video decoder or the Cortex-A9s really suck the power out of the battery when rendering web pages.
Video playback
-
Motorola RAZR MAXX (ICS)
16:35 -
Motorola DROID RAZR MAXX
14:17 -
Apple iPad mini
12:51 -
Samsung Galaxy Premier
12:51 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
12:30 -
Huawei Ascend Mate
12:18 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
11:29 -
Samsung Galaxy Note II N7100
11:27 -
BlackBerry Q10
11:15 -
Apple iPhone 5
10:12 -
HTC One
10:02 -
Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III
10:01 -
Samsung Galaxy Express
10:00 -
Samsung I9105 Galaxy S II Plus
10:00 -
Nokia 808 PureView
9:53 -
Samsung I8530 Galaxy Beam
9:42 -
Samsung Rugby Smart I847
9:34 -
HTC One S
9:28 -
Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III (JB)
9:27 -
Apple iPhone 4S
9:24 -
HTC Evo 4G LTE
9:07 -
BlackBerry Z10
8:44 -
LG Optimus G Pro
8:40 -
Nokia N9
8:40 -
Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3
8:34 -
HTC Butterfly
8:28 -
Samsung Galaxy Note
8:25 -
Samsung Galaxy Grand Duos
8:11 -
HTC One X+
8:11 -
Motorola RAZR i
8:11 -
Samsung Galaxy S II
8:00 -
Samsung i937 Focus S
7:55 -
Samsung Wave 3 S8600
7:52 -
Samsung Galaxy S III mini
7:46 -
Sony Ericsson Xperia neo V
7:45 -
Asus Padfone 2
7:38 -
Huawei Ascend P1
7:38 -
Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G
7:33 -
HTC Droid DNA
7:30 -
Samsung Galaxy Note LTE
7:30 -
Samsung Galaxy Xcover 2
7:30 -
Sony Xperia SP
7:27 -
Nokia Lumia 610
7:23 -
LG Optimus G
7:16 -
Nokia Lumia 720
6:43 -
Meizu MX 4-core
6:33 -
Nokia Lumia 620
6:32 -
HTC Windows Phone 8X
6:27 -
Sony Xperia E dual
6:27 -
Nokia Lumia 810
6:27 -
HTC Desire V
6:26 -
HTC One X (AT&T)
6:26 -
Nokia Lumia 820
6:25 -
Samsung Galaxy Ace Duos
6:25 -
Nokia Lumia 510
6:23 -
LG Optimus Vu
6:23 -
Samsung I9103 Galaxy R
6:21 -
Nokia Lumia 920
6:19 -
HTC Sensation XL
6:12 -
Samsung Galaxy Pocket
6:06 -
Samsung Captivate Glide
6:04 -
Sony Xperia ion LTE
6:03 -
Samsung Galaxy Nexus
6:02 -
Sony Xperia T
6:01 -
Motorola Atrix HD
6:01 -
HTC Vivid
6:00 -
HTC Radar
5:54 -
Nokia Lumia 800
5:52 -
Nokia Lumia 520
5:50 -
HTC Titan II
5:50 -
BlackBerry Bold 9790
5:47 -
HTC One X
5:45 -
Sony Ericsson Xperia Pro
5:44 -
Sony Xperia Z
5:39 -
Sony Xperia acro S
5:38 -
HTC Desire X
5:38 -
Pantech Burst
5:38 -
Sony Xperia ZL
5:28 -
Meizu MX
5:27 -
HTC Rhyme
5:23 -
HTC One V
5:20 -
Acer CloudMobile S500
5:18 -
Oppo Find 5
5:18 -
Nokia Lumia 900 for AT&T
5:18 -
BlackBerry Curve 9380
5:09 -
HTC Rezound
5:03 -
Samsung Galaxy Fame
5:02 -
Google Nexus 4
4:55 -
Sony Xperia L
4:44 -
Samsung Galaxy S Duos
4:30 -
Sony Xperia P
4:30 -
LG Nitro HD
4:17 -
LG Optimus 4X HD
4:14 -
LG Optimus 3D Max P720
3:28 -
Nokia Lumia 710
3:27
The endurance rating is a convincing win for the Huawei Ascend Mate with an impressive 81 hour result. The Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3 scored an okay 60 hours.
Winner: With definitive wins in the talk time and video playback tests, a good web browsing result and a great endurance rating, the Huawei Ascend Mate takes the battery crown.
The Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3 showed good results, but the relatively small (for a phablet) battery capacity put a limit on how far it can go.
Reader comments
- imouse
- 18 Sep 2014
- mpb
I own both models featured here. My honest opinion is one of 'Both as good as the other' There's only one slight niggle that i have with my Mate, and that's speaker distortion during calls, it seems to have a metallic echo with higher pitched fem...
- AnonD-283243
- 14 Jul 2014
- N9@
Ascend Mate is the best and I'm using it.
- Along
- 19 Mar 2014
- EqK
Ascend mate are better than mega,i have been used both of them and i strongly recommend to buy mate.it more cheaper and better in performance than mega