Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 review: The roadster
The roadster
Synthetic benchmarks
The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 is powered by a Samsung-made Exynos 4412 Quad-core chipset with four Cortex-A9 cores clocked at 1.6GHz, 2GB of RAM and a Mali-400 GPU. We've put it head to head with some of the best quad-cores around.
It features the same internals as the Samsung Galaxy Note II, and while that may have been enough to top the charts back when the Note II was released, the pack has moved on since.
In Benchmark Pi the Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 scores about the same as the Galaxy Note II, but is largely bested by most of the recently announced flagships out there.
Benchmark Pi
Lower is better
-
LG Optimus G Pro
147 -
HTC One
151 -
Sony Xperia Z
264 -
HTC Butterfly
266 -
Oppo Find 5
267 -
HTC One X+
280 -
LG Optimus G
285 -
Samsung Galaxy Note II
305 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0
324 -
HTC One X (Tegra 3)
330 -
LG Optimus 4X HD
350 -
Samsung Galaxy S III
359 -
Meizu MX 4-core
362 -
Nexus 4
431
AnTuTu and Quadrant are similar stories - results which are more or less comparable to the last generation of flagship droids, but can't compete with current top models.
AnTuTu
Higher is better
-
HTC One
22678 -
Sony Xperia Z
20794 -
LG Optimus G Pro
20056 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0
17159 -
Samsung Galaxy S III
15547 -
Oppo Find 5
15167 -
HTC Butterfly
12631
Quadrant
Higher is better
-
LG Optimus G Pro
12105 -
HTC One
11746 -
Sony Xperia Z
8075 -
HTC One X+
7632 -
LG Optimus G
7439 -
Oppo Find 5
7111 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0
6942 -
HTC One X
5952 -
Samsung Galaxy Note II
5916 -
Samsung Galaxy S III
5450 -
Meizu MX 4-core
5170 -
LG Optimus 4X HD
4814 -
Nexus 4
4567
GLBenchmark 2.5 puts the graphics processor to the test, and the device rates towards the bottom half when offscreen fps are measured.
GLBenchmark 2.5 Egypt (1080p offscreen)
Higher is better
-
HTC One
34 -
Asus Padfone 2
31 -
Oppo Find 5
30 -
LG Optimus G Pro
29 -
Sony Xperia Z
29 -
LG Optimus G
29 -
Apple iPhone 5
27 -
Nexus 4
26 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0
17 -
Samsung Galaxy Note II
17 -
Samsung Galaxy S III
15 -
HTC One X+
12 -
HTC One X
9
Epic Citadel, on the other hand, measures performance at native resolution, and posts some good numbers, beating out the Galaxy S III flagship.
Epic Citadel
Higher is better
-
Sony Xperia Z
55.6 -
LG Optimus G Pro
54.2 -
Nexus 4
53.9 -
Asus Padfone 2
53.4 -
LG Optimus G
52.6 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0
46.3 -
Samsung Galaxy S III
41.3 -
Oppo Find 5
38.6
Finally, when it comes to JavaScript performance we got a pretty good results from the Note 8.0.
SunSpider
Lower is better
-
Samsung Ativ S
891 -
Apple iPhone 5
915 -
Nokia Lumia 920
910 -
Samsung Galaxy Note II
972 -
HTC One X+
1001 -
LG Optimus G Pro
1011 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0
1016 -
Motorola RAZR i XT890
1059 -
HTC One
1124 -
Samsung Galaxy S III
1192 -
Meizu MX 4-core
1312 -
LG Optimus G
1353 -
HTC Butterfly
1433 -
Sony Xperia Z
1906 -
Nexus 4
1971 -
Oppo Find 5
2045
Reader comments
- Zwei
- 03 Jul 2022
- 7Xd
Ive had this as a kid and i found the old box today. Somehow Theres brand new unused samsung earphones in it still working lmao, Anyways, I remember play alot of minecraft on this thing and absolutely made my childhood, apperently i lost the pen and ...
- Ravn
- 16 Dec 2019
- IWR
The battery time has dropped a little but it works like when it was bought. I still use it regularly.
- since 2013
- 24 Apr 2019
- Iwj
bought a galaxy note 5 phone and this note tab 8.0 and heres the thing, replaced the tab's battery once but its not good either, cheap ebay replacement batt. lil slow compared to 2019 tabs but the Note5 phone is actually better than my 3 month old P...