Samsung Galaxy S5 review: Fab Five
Fab Five
Synthetic benchmarks
The Samsung Galaxy S5 is based on a Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset (MSM8974AC). Some clarification is due since not all 801 chipsets are created equal. The MSM8974 is the base Snapdragon 800 chipset, while MSM8974AB overclocks the GPU and gets the Snapdragon 801 badge.
The MSM8974AC goes a step further and clocks the CPU higher too. Also worth pointing out, on the KitKat software, Samsung has removed the benchmark detection and overclocking, so if the Galaxy S5 doesn't trounce the Galaxy Note 3 it's because it's showing real performance.
Surprisingly, Benchmark Pi isn't showing much difference between the Galaxy S4 and S5. We'll chalk this off to the benchmark being old as Linpack and Geekbench 3 show a definite improvement. Geekbench in particular puts the Galaxy S5 on top, while Linpack places it within a percent of Snapdragon 800 devices (some of which may have been engaged in benchmark-specific overclocking).
Update: We re-ran some benchmarks after the Galaxy S5 was updated to Android 5.0 Lollipop. You can find more details here.
Benchmark Pi
Lower is better
-
LG G Flex
99 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
99 -
LG G2
99 -
Sony Xperia Z1 Compact
104 -
Sony Xperia Z1
115 -
Sony Xperia Z Ultra
115 -
HTC One (M8)
121 -
Samsung Galaxy S5
128 -
HTC One Max
131 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
132 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
132 -
LG G Pro 2
141 -
LG Nexus 5
146 -
HTC One
151 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 mini
166 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo
183
Linpack
Higher is better
-
LG G Flex
1102 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
1081 -
LG G2
1054 -
Sony Xperia Z Ultra
1034 -
Sony Xperia Z1 Compact
1010 -
Sony Xperia Z1
1004 -
Samsung Galaxy S5
992 -
HTC One (M8)
992 -
LG G Pro 2
818 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
791 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
788 -
LG Optimus G Pro
743 -
HTC One
646 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 mini
413 -
LG Nexus 5
393
Geekbench 3
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S5 (Lollipop)
3120 -
Samsung Galaxy S5
3011 -
Sony Xperia Z1 Compact
2968 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
2937 -
Sony Xperia Z Ultra
2670 -
Sony Xperia Z1
2638 -
LG G Pro 2
2585 -
Apple iPhone 5s
2561 -
LG Nexus 5
2453 -
HTC One (M8)
2367 -
LG G Flex
2254 -
LG G2
2243 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo
2172 -
HTC One
1972 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
1869
We also traditionally put the reviewed phones through the Basemark OS II. Rightware distributes anti-cheat versions of their popular Basemark OS II (for general performance) and Basemark X (for 3D performance) tests. We've run both version and we found Samsung Galaxy S5 scores equally, which means the company isn't using any tricks to boost the benchmarks' overall performance.
Basemark OS II
Higher is better
-
Oppo Find 7
1212 -
OnePlus One
1196 -
LG G3 16GB (2GB RAM, int'l)
1151 -
Samsung Galaxy S5 (Lollipop)
1147 -
HTC One (M8)
1126 -
Samsung Galaxy S5
1082 -
Sony Xperia Z2
1080 -
Oppo Find 7a
1057
Basemark OS II (single-core)
Higher is better
-
Oppo Find 7
2606 -
Oppo Find 7a
2580 -
Samsung Galaxy S5 (Lollipop)
2510 -
HTC One (M8)
2428 -
Samsung Galaxy S5
2415 -
Sony Xperia Z2
2253 -
OnePlus One
2213 -
LG G3 16GB (2GB RAM, int'l)
2137
Basemark OS II (multi-core)
Higher is better
-
Oppo Find 7
10391 -
Oppo Find 7a
10256 -
OnePlus One
10234 -
Samsung Galaxy S5
10063 -
Sony Xperia Z2
10044 -
LG G3 16GB (2GB RAM, int'l)
9937 -
HTC One (M8)
9860 -
Samsung Galaxy S5 (Lollipop)
9646
Compound benchmarks - Quadrant and AnTuTu 4 - show more confidence in Galaxy S5. Quadrant gives Samsung's new flagship a huge advantage over the S800 competition, and virtually on par with the HTC One (M8).
Quadrant
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S5
25044 -
HTC One (M8)
25035 -
Sony Xperia Z1 Compact
21618 -
LG G Flex
20521 -
Sony Xperia Z1
20388 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
20052 -
LG G Pro 2
20010 -
LG G2
19815 -
Sony Xperia Z Ultra
18177 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
12446 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
12376 -
LG Optimus G Pro
12105 -
HTC One
11746 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo
11404 -
LG Nexus 5
8844 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 mini
7153
AnTuTu 4
Higher is better
-
HTC One (M8)
37009 -
Samsung Galaxy S5
36018 -
LG G Flex
35831 -
LG G2
35444 -
Sony Xperia Z1 Compact
34527 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo
32162 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
31109 -
Sony Xperia Z1
30850 -
LG G Pro 2
29603 -
Sony Xperia Z Ultra
29185 -
Samsung Galaxy S4
27613 -
HTC One
26389 -
LG Nexus 5
25097
When it comes to offscreen benchmarks, the High clock speed of the new Adreno 330 easily pushes it on top, but screen resolution has to be taken into account.
GFX Benchmark 2.7 T-Rex (1080p off-screen)
Higher is better
-
HTC One (M8)
28.4 -
Samsung Galaxy S5
27.8 -
Samsung Galaxy S5 (Lollipop)
27 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
26.3 -
LG Nexus 5
23 -
Sony Xperia Z1
23 -
Sony Xperia Z Ultra
23 -
Apple iPhone 5s
23 -
LG G Pro 2
22.9 -
Sony Xperia Z1 Compact
22 -
LG G Flex
22 -
LG G2
22 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
17.1 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
17.1 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo
15 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 mini
6.4
GFX Benchmark 3.0 Manhattan (1080p off-screen)
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S5 (Lollipop)
12 -
Samsung Galaxy S5
11.8 -
HTC One (M8)
11.1 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
9.9 -
Sony Xperia Z1 Compact
9 -
LG G Pro 2
8.7 -
LG Nexus 5
8.5 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo
3.7 -
Samsung Galaxy Grand 2
1.9
Lower resolution phones (720p or so) like the Xperia Z1 Compact and iPhone 5s climb on top, but as far as 1080p devices go, the Galaxy S5 is only matched by the HTC One (M8) on the GFXBench suite. Epic Citadel places it a bit lower though it's within a couple of percent.
GFX Benchmark 2.7 T-Rex (1080p on-screen)
Higher is better
-
Apple iPhone 5s
37 -
Sony Xperia Z1 Compact
34 -
LG G Flex
33 -
HTC One (M8)
30.1 -
Samsung Galaxy S5
28.1 -
Samsung Galaxy S5 (Lollipop)
28 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
26.7 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo
25 -
LG G Pro 2
24.1 -
LG Nexus 5
24 -
LG G2
23.1
GFX Benchmark 3.0 Manhattan (1080p on-screen)
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S5 (Lollipop)
12 -
HTC One (M8)
11.9 -
Samsung Galaxy S5
11.7 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
10 -
LG G Pro 2
9.2 -
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 8.4
5 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo
4.7
Epic Citadel
Higher is better
-
HTC One (M8)
59 -
LG G Flex
56 -
Sony Xperia Z
55.6 -
Sony Xperia Z1
54.8 -
LG G Pro 2
54.1 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
54 -
Samsung Galaxy S5
53.7 -
LG Nexus 5
49.1 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo
49 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
37.2 -
Samsung Galaxy Grand 2
32
Samsung tweaked the stock Android browser, which clearly shows in the web benchmarks. The Samsung Galaxy S5 trades blows with the Apple iPhone 5s. Apple's iDevices have long set the standard in web performance, but screen resolution plays a role in BrowserMark 2 as the Galaxy S5 renders pages at over twice the resolution.
SunSpider
Lower is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S5
379 -
Apple iPhone 5s
403 -
LG G Pro 2
535.5 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo
567.9 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
587 -
Sony Xperia Z Ultra
750 -
HTC One (M8)
780 -
LG Nexus 5
827 -
Sony Xperia Z1
845 -
Sony Xperia Z1 Compact
855 -
LG G2
908 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
1046 -
HTC One
1174
BrowserMark 2
Higher is better
-
Apple iPhone 5s
3549 -
Samsung Galaxy S5
3529 -
HTC One (M8)
3213 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo
3172 -
LG G Pro 2
3048 -
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
3041 -
LG Nexus 5
2745 -
LG G2
2718 -
Sony Xperia Z1 Compact
2600 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
2438 -
Sony Xperia Z Ultra
2419 -
Sony Xperia Z1
2398 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 mini
2314 -
HTC One
2262
So, is the new chipset worth it over the Galaxy S4 chipset? The Galaxy S5 is indeed faster than its predecessor in all relevant areas. Gaming performance is the headlining change here - the new phone offers significant advantages over the old one, which will enable more advanced games.
Overall performance has received a boost too, but you might not notice it in general usage where most apps are lightweight and fairly passive (say, a messenger). Still, if you have two heavier apps, the Galaxy S5 will run them side by side with Multi Window without breaking a sweat.
Reader comments
- Aaron
- 29 Jun 2024
- YU8
I like the phone
- Dave90
- 24 Jul 2023
- qQC
US carriers were still selling the regular S4 in 2014. Snapdragon 800 model never came to the US.