Samsung Galaxy S6 Active review: The triathlete

The triathlete

GSMArena team, 24 June 2015.

Performance

Like the regular Samsung Galaxy S6, the Active variant packs the highly capable Exynos 7420 chipset. It's the first SoC to be built on a 14nm fabrication process (Snapdragon 810 is on 20nm), which should reduce power usage. That in turn reduces the dreaded thermal throttling that was a major issue in the Exynos vs. Snapdragon debate recently.

Exynos 7420 and Snapdragon 810 are not that different in terms of processor, both use a big.LITTLE setup with four Cortex-A57 cores at 2.1GHz and four Cortex-A53 cores at 1.5GHz. The GPU is a Mali-T760 from ARM and it shares 3GB of RAM with the processor.

The Galaxy S6 Active runs a 64-bit version of Android 5.0.2 and all eight of its cores are 64-bit capable. This is good for the future, but for now 32-bit apps run just fine - in fact, AnTuTu 5 offered both options. It returned equal scores in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes, matching the rest of the Galaxy S6 family, and crushing the Snapdragon opposition.

AnTuTu 5

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S6 Active
    70938
  • Samsung Galaxy S6 edge
    70053
  • Samsung Galaxy S6
    69396
  • Sony Xperia Z3+
    55195
  • HTC One M9
    51427
  • Huawei P8
    50876
  • Motorola Nexus 6
    49803
  • LG G4
    49295
  • Motorola Droid Turbo
    47067

Basemark OS 2.0 paints a similar picture. Once again, Samsung Galaxy S6 Active keeps pace with its siblings.

Basemark OS II

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S6 edge
    1826
  • Samsung Galaxy S6
    1769
  • Samsung Galaxy S6 Active
    1650
  • Sony Xperia Z3+
    1572
  • HTC One M9
    1526
  • Motorola Nexus 6
    1509
  • Motorola Droid Turbo
    1345
  • Huawei P8
    1056

Looking at just the CPU performance at GeekBench 3, we see a massive advantage in multicore performance. The Snapdragon 810 runs its CPU cores a little slower (0.1GHz), but that's far too little to account for the difference. Basemark OS 2.0 confirms both the single-core and multi-core difference.

GeekBench 3

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S6 Active
    5246
  • Samsung Galaxy S6
    5215
  • Samsung Galaxy S6 edge
    5095
  • Sony Xperia Z3+
    3772
  • HTC One M9
    3761
  • LG G4
    3509
  • Huawei P8
    3380
  • Motorola Nexus 6
    3285
  • Motorola Droid Turbo
    3080

Basemark OS II (single-core)

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S6
    3497
  • Samsung Galaxy S6 Active
    3489
  • Samsung Galaxy S6 edge
    3372
  • Sony Xperia Z3+
    2480
  • HTC One M9
    2401
  • Motorola Droid Turbo
    2351
  • Huawei P8
    2111
  • Motorola Nexus 6
    1967

Basemark OS II (multi-core)

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S6 Active
    18536
  • Samsung Galaxy S6
    16986
  • Samsung Galaxy S6 edge
    16856
  • Huawei P8
    14046
  • Motorola Droid Turbo
    10146
  • HTC One M9
    10128
  • Motorola Nexus 6
    9915
  • Sony Xperia Z3+
    8720

Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a QHD screen - 1,440 x 2,560px. That's around 80% more pixels than a 1080p screen. Offscreen tests normalize resolution at 1080p so you can compare raw performance, while on-screen tests predict real-world gaming performance.

Basemark X considers only off-screen results and predictably gives the win to the Galaxy S6 Active.

GFX 2.7 T-Rex (1080p offscreen)

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S6
    59
  • Samsung Galaxy S6 edge
    59
  • HTC One M9
    49
  • Sony Xperia Z3+
    46.5
  • Samsung Galaxy S6 Active
    45
  • Motorola Droid Turbo
    40.9
  • Motorola Nexus 6
    38.9
  • LG G4
    34.5
  • Huawei P8
    10

GFX 2.7 T-Rex (onscreen)

Higher is better

  • HTC One M9
    50
  • Sony Xperia Z3+
    46.8
  • Samsung Galaxy S6 edge
    39
  • Samsung Galaxy S6
    38
  • Motorola Nexus 6
    27.4
  • Motorola Droid Turbo
    26.6
  • Samsung Galaxy S6 Active
    25
  • LG G4
    24.7
  • Huawei P8
    10.7

GFX 3.0 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S6 edge
    26
  • Samsung Galaxy S6 Active
    25
  • Samsung Galaxy S6
    24
  • HTC One M9
    23
  • Sony Xperia Z3+
    20.7
  • Motorola Nexus 6
    18.6
  • Motorola Droid Turbo
    18
  • LG G4
    14.9
  • Huawei P8
    5.4

GFX 3.0 Manhattan (onscreen)

Higher is better

  • HTC One M9
    24
  • Sony Xperia Z3+
    20.5
  • Samsung Galaxy S6 edge
    15
  • Samsung Galaxy S6 Active
    15
  • Samsung Galaxy S6
    14
  • Motorola Nexus 6
    11.9
  • Motorola Droid Turbo
    11.4
  • LG G4
    9.4
  • Huawei P8
    5.7

Basemark X

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S6 Active
    27188
  • Samsung Galaxy S6
    27169
  • Samsung Galaxy S6 edge
    27046
  • Sony Xperia Z3+
    23334
  • Motorola Nexus 6
    20901
  • HTC One M9
    19848
  • Motorola Droid Turbo
    18971
  • LG G4
    15090
  • Huawei P8
    6307

For web browsing performance we used the Internet app (stock web browser), as Samsung sprinkles proprietary optimization magic that's not available in Chrome or the vanilla Android browser. Once again, Samsung Galaxy S6 Active proved worthy of its flagship pedigree.

Kraken 1.1

Lower is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S6 Active
    3975
  • Samsung Galaxy S6 edge
    3989
  • LG G4
    4085
  • Samsung Galaxy S6
    4154
  • Sony Xperia Z3+
    4745
  • HTC One M9
    5500
  • Motorola Droid Turbo
    5763
  • Motorola Nexus 6
    6088
  • Huawei P8
    11867

BrowserMark 2.1

Higher is better

  • Samsung Galaxy S6
    2718
  • Samsung Galaxy S6 edge
    2702
  • Sony Xperia Z3+
    2337
  • Samsung Galaxy S6 Active
    2321
  • LG G4
    1990
  • HTC One M9
    1681
  • Motorola Droid Turbo
    1487
  • Motorola Nexus 6
    1447
  • Huawei P8
    764

There is no other way to cut it - Samsung Galaxy S6 Active is one of the most powerful smartphones you can buy at the moment. Like the regular Galaxy S6, the newcomer laughs at just about every benchmark test out there.

Reader comments

Wow, so cool. That is a true water resistant phone.

The phone is really a great phone, but now it's history. It only have problem of battery, it dues at any time, any percentage. Then the SIM CARD slot is plastic, it's broken if always removed and put back atimes. Finally, it hangs sometimes...

  • XD7
  • 28 Jul 2020
  • 841

I don't think so.