Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5 review: Splashing colors

Splashing colors

GSMArena team, 30 June 2014.

Synthetic benhcmarks

The Wi-Fi-only version of the Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5 features Exynos Octa 5422 chipset with 1.9GHz quad-core Cortex-A15 CPU and 1.3 GHz quad-core Cortex-A7 CPU. The GPU is Mali-T628 GPU, while 3GB of RAM make sure everything runs smoothly on the device.

GeekBench 3 and AnTuTu 4 are benchmarks which put to the test the hardware combo inside the tablet. GeekBench 3 is more CPU-intensive, whereas AnTuTu 4 is a compound benchmark - testing CPU, GPU, memory performance among others.

GeekBench 3

Higher is better

  • Oppo Find 7a
    3093
  • Galaxy S5 (Snapdragon 801)
    3011
  • Galaxy S5 Active
    3010
  • Galaxy Tab S 8.4 (Exynos)
    2881
  • Sony Xperia Z2
    2856
  • LG G3
    2687
  • LG G Pro 2
    2585
  • LG Nexus 5
    2453
  • HTC One (M8)
    2367
  • LG G2
    2243
  • Motorola Moto X
    2123
  • Galaxy Tab S 10.5 (Exynos)
    1777
  • HTC One mini 2
    1526
  • Sony Xperia T2 Ultra
    1359

AnTuTu 4

Higher is better

  • HTC One (M8)
    37009
  • Galaxy S5 Active
    36162
  • Galaxy S5 (Snapdragon 801)
    36018
  • LG G2
    35444
  • Galaxy Tab S 8.4 (Exynos)
    35359
  • Galaxy Tab S 10.5 (Exynos)
    33961
  • Oppo Find 7a
    33344
  • Sony Xperia Z2
    33182
  • LG G3
    30482
  • LG G Pro 2
    29603
  • LG Nexus 5
    25097
  • Sony Xperia T2 Ultra
    19896
  • Motorola Moto X
    19031
  • HTC One mini 2
    17883

Basemark OS II is another all-round benchmark. It gives an overall score along with single-core, multi-core, and math performance. The tablet didn't blow us away on this occasion.

Basemark OS II

Higher is better

  • LG G3
    1151
  • LG G Pro 2
    1140
  • LG G3 (anti-cheat)
    1132
  • HTC One (M8)
    1126
  • Galaxy S5 Active
    1107
  • Galaxy S5 (Snapdragon 801)
    1082
  • Sony Xperia Z2
    1080
  • Oppo Find 7a
    1057
  • Galaxy Tab S 10.5 (Exynos) anti-cheat
    829
  • Galaxy Tab S 8.4 (Exynos) anti-cheat
    768
  • HTC One mini 2
    517
  • Sony Xperia T2 Ultra
    434

Next up we have GFXBench's 2.7 T-Rex and 3.0 Manhattan. The Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5 performed in an underwhelming fashion here - its GPU simply couldn't manage all the pixels the way a flagship device should during the on-screen tests. The off-screen results were slightly better, yet still far from the top of the charts.

GFX 2.7 T-Rex (1080p offscreen)

Higher is better

  • HTC One (M8)
    28.4
  • Oppo Find 7a
    28.4
  • Galaxy S5 (Snapdragon 801)
    27.8
  • LG G3
    27.6
  • Samsung Galaxy S5 Active
    27.5
  • Sony Xperia Z2
    27.2
  • LG Nexus 5
    23
  • LG G Pro 2
    22.9
  • Galaxy Tab S 8.4 (Exynos)
    22.8
  • Galaxy Tab S 10.5 (Exynos)
    22.5
  • LG G2
    22
  • Motorola Moto X
    16
  • Sony Xperia T2 Ultra
    5.8
  • HTC One mini 2
    5.8

GFX 2.7 T-Rex (onscreen)

Higher is better

  • HTC One (M8)
    30.1
  • Oppo Find 7a
    28.8
  • Sony Xperia Z2
    28.7
  • Galaxy S5 (Snapdragon 801)
    28.1
  • Galaxy S5 Active
    27.7
  • LG G Pro 2
    24.1
  • LG Nexus 5
    24
  • LG G2
    23.1
  • LG G3
    20.6
  • Galaxy Tab S 10.5 (Exynos)
    14
  • Galaxy Tab S 8.4 (Exynos)
    14
  • HTC One mini 2
    11
  • Sony Xperia T2 Ultra
    10.9

GFX 3.0 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)

Higher is better

  • LG G3
    11.9
  • Galaxy S5 (Snapdragon 801)
    11.8
  • Galaxy S5 Active
    11.7
  • Sony Xperia Z2
    11.7
  • Oppo Find 7a
    11.4
  • HTC One (M8)
    11.1
  • LG G Pro 2
    8.7
  • Galaxy Tab S 8.4 (Exynos)
    5.6
  • Galaxy Tab S 10.5 (Exynos)
    5.6
  • HTC One mini 2
    1.7

GFX 3.0 Manhattan (onscreen)

Higher is better

  • Sony Xperia Z2
    12.2
  • HTC One (M8)
    11.9
  • Galaxy S5 (Snapdragon 801)
    11.7
  • Galaxy S5 Active
    11.7
  • Oppo Find 7a
    11.4
  • LG G Pro 2
    9.2
  • LG G3
    7.4
  • Sony Xperia T2 Ultra
    4.1
  • HTC One mini 2
    3.8
  • Galaxy Tab S 8.4 (Exynos)
    2.9
  • Galaxy Tab S 10.5 (Exynos)
    2.9

BrowserMark 2.1 looks at HTML 5 performance, while Mozilla's Kraken 1.1 is JavaScript-centric. The Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5 did well on Kraken, but didn't impress on BrowserMark.

BrowserMark 2.1

Higher is better

  • Galaxy Tab S 8.4 (Exynos)
    1681
  • Galaxy Tab S 10.5 (Exynos)
    1515
  • Galaxy S5 (Snapdragon 801)
    1398
  • LG G Pro 2
    1346
  • Oppo Find 7a
    1327
  • Galaxy S5 Active
    1319
  • LG Nexus 5
    1286
  • LG G3
    1254
  • Sony Xperia Z2
    1224
  • HTC One (M8)
    1069
  • HTC One mini 2
    945

Kraken 1.1

Lower is better

  • Galaxy Tab S 10.5 (Exynos)
    4777
  • Galaxy Tab S 8.4 (Exynos)
    4927
  • Galaxy S5 (Snapdragon 801)
    6043
  • Galaxy S5 Active
    6341
  • LG G Pro 2
    6578
  • Oppo Find 7a
    6660
  • Sony Xperia Z2
    7041
  • LG Nexus 5
    7148
  • LG G3
    7610
  • HTC One (M8)
    10296
  • HTC One mini 2
    15684

Overall, the benchmark performance of the Samsung Galaxy Tab S 10.5 turned out to be a mixed bag. GPU performance in particular in nowhere near what's expected from a flagship slate - it had a hard time handling all the pixels of the Super AMOLED display.

Reader comments

  • Anonymous
  • 28 Jul 2024
  • 7%h

10 years here, no changes or burn in, I suspect that the 300 nits limits prevent damage compared to the S5 phone which I think use the same display but unlocked.

  • Ravi27
  • 31 Oct 2022
  • 7km

After almost 8 years my tab is still running with nice battery although I don't use it heavily or play games. The screen is splendid and try to match my new samsung S7 plus tab. Well made samsung.

  • Secybeast006
  • 21 May 2021
  • rKg

You good bro?