Samsung Galaxy View2
MORE PICTURES

Samsung Galaxy View2

User opinions and reviews

Sort by:

lolno, 01 May 2019What is this, I don't even XD Over 2kg for a tablet? Are... moreMost of your points make sense but this is practically a TV with a battery, not a laptop/tablet, just extremely overpriced. However, there's nothing wrong with the weight actually, the average laptop has only 1/3 the capacity of this thing's internal powerbank, and the weak ARM-based SoC and RAM potentially helps in battery life even further

    Coral, 02 May 2019No. Look at the A50 review here on gsmarena. At best, the ... moreSD 660 and Exynos 9610 give about the same performance.
    Its left to nm's and battery consumption sadly. Exynos 9610's CPU is great but no one knows why samsung decided to use a weak GPU and thats disappointing

      • C
      • Coral
      • nbL
      • 02 May 2019

      MohammadME, 01 May 2019Umm no. Snapdragon 660 is inferior to the exynos 9610. The ... moreNo. Look at the A50 review here on gsmarena.
      At best, the Exynos 9610 is just as fast as the SD 660, but clearly not better.
      It doesn't have a chance against the SD 675 or SD 710, which are still a good bit faster.

        Sam sunk, 01 May 2019Nope. Exynos 9610 (as in the Samsung A50) is *almost* a mat... moreUmm no. Snapdragon 660 is inferior to the exynos 9610. The 9610 will be somewhere close to the snapdragon 670.

          • l
          • lolno
          • nbL
          • 01 May 2019

          What is this, I don't even XD

          Over 2kg for a tablet? Are they going for new heavyweight champion? XD
          Seriously, I've seen laptops that weigh less, and they still have the benefit of an added keyboard, and you can do much more with them than only watching media.

          As it is, this device screams "failure" all over. It's far too weak to be used for anything but media consumption, it's far too heavy to have it with you all the time, it doesn't even come with a keyboard to make up for the extreme weight, it only comes with outdated Android 8, and considering you can only use it for media watching, it's brutally overpriced. No thank you.

            To Samsunk, this device was made for media, not for tasks that need much power. Its for entertainment.

              • S
              • Sam sunk
              • 3K{
              • 01 May 2019

              Allusion, 23 Apr 2019Exynos 7885 is slightly worse than Snapdragon 660Nope. Exynos 9610 (as in the Samsung A50) is *almost* a match for the SD 660, but not quite.
              Exynos 7884 is clearly worse and not even a match for the SD 630.
              Plus, tiny 3GB ram is pitiful. Why are they even bothering with this, if they're only going to put crap hardware into it?
              The price for this low-end junk, over 600€, is ludicrously impudent as well.

                Harrison Wells, 29 Apr 2019Odd decision that they didn't use a 1440p or a HDR10 displa... moreI second this

                  A mobile TV that can run apps and supports a SIM card. Could've been cheaper tbh, so get this thing with a discount/price cut, folks

                  In a related topic, it seems that this is meant to be like the Tab S5e. Except that one has a smaller OLED screen, is more mobile and can handle games better... but no 3.5mm jack...

                    Anonymous, 30 Apr 2019processor seems to be very slow, and they use LCD panel, to... moreThe biggest OLED display on a tablet is 10.5", you'll need a real monitor for anything bigger. Even the biggest LCD tablet is this tablet's predecessor, the Galaxy View

                      • ?
                      • Anonymous
                      • 8x$
                      • 30 Apr 2019

                      processor seems to be very slow, and they use LCD panel, too bad, it was a pretty good option but those specs look really bad

                        • ?
                        • Anonymous
                        • rA4
                        • 30 Apr 2019

                        Rabbit50, 29 Apr 2019Okay just to get you guys cleared. A 14 inch laptop has ... moreA large 68 inch TV with 'only' 4k resolution, only has 1/4 of the PPI of this. You don't hear people complaining of the resolution. People here need to grow up and get their facts straight!!

                          • E
                          • Emad
                          • q1q
                          • 29 Apr 2019

                          This would be nice if it had a rear-facing camera. Now it is useless for AR demos.

                            • ?
                            • Anonymous
                            • KID
                            • 29 Apr 2019

                            very slow processor

                              • V
                              • Vajra
                              • tT6
                              • 29 Apr 2019

                              Another flop!!

                                • H
                                • Harrison Wells
                                • xv}
                                • 29 Apr 2019

                                Odd decision that they didn't use a 1440p or a HDR10 display. I get why they didn't go for an AMOLED, but having an HDR-supported display would be great for streaming and keep prices down.

                                  • A
                                  • Ammar212
                                  • 0m3
                                  • 29 Apr 2019

                                  Diego, 27 Apr 2019Cand someone olease explain to me why the tablets and this ... moreBecause if it is contain 8GB RAM and 256GB storage with 17.3 inch it will be probably a laptop with windows, cost will be $1600 plus plus

                                  they want to make it cheaper, for kids play, movie, youtube. thats what you need 3GB ram and 64GB and SD card with 400GB

                                    • R
                                    • Rabbit50
                                    • X{i
                                    • 29 Apr 2019

                                    Okay just to get you guys cleared.

                                    A 14 inch laptop has 1920x1080
                                    A 15 inch laptop has 1920x1080

                                    Both above is basically very bad quality and does not cross anyones mind as "good displays"

                                    But this with 17+ inch screen 1920x1080....should be the worst display of the decade. Really samsung ? Best display maker in the world comes with this ?

                                    Seriously, I think samsung found a set of displays made in 2011 in their garage, they think...what should we do...?

                                    Then a former apple employee comes there.."Hey...why dont we use the old tech and release a new device...we call that innovation back at apple...chop chop..lets get on with it"

                                      • ?
                                      • Anonymous
                                      • 043
                                      • 28 Apr 2019

                                      I'd say the biggest weak point of this is the OS

                                        Anonymous, 23 Apr 2019126 ppi is awfulMost 17 inch laptops are 1080P, I use the original 18.4 inch Galaxy View and the screen is fine.