Samsung Galaxy W I8150
MORE PICTURES

Samsung Galaxy W I8150

User opinions and reviews

Sort by:

  • n
  • najwalatif
  • K1F
  • 09 Dec 2011

i'm using this samsung w. and its cool.

    • ?
    • Anonymous
    • HvX
    • 09 Dec 2011

    AnonD-8542, 09 Dec 2011LOL, GSMArena has also been a big fan of the SuperAMOLED ev... moreYea I noticed while reading some other Samsung smartphone reviews that they couldn't resist bitchin' about a phone if it doesn't have amoled. lol

      • G
      • Gohub
      • JK$
      • 09 Dec 2011

      I dont know which one to buy, this one or LG 2x ? I like TW 4.0 more than LG UI, but LG is dual-core, and i can only buy one of these two, thank you on your answer :)

        • t
        • tharif
        • ppE
        • 09 Dec 2011

        quick question about the charger.. Can anyone tell me the output rating of the charger? Is it same as galaxy s? (5V, 0.7A)

          • ?
          • Anonymous
          • t7C
          • 09 Dec 2011

          Samsung Galaxy Ace is better :) it has a corning gorilla glass

            • D
            • AnonD-8542
            • ibm
            • 09 Dec 2011

            Anonymous, 09 Dec 2011In all honesty I think that review doesnt do justice to the... moreLOL, GSMArena has also been a big fan of the SuperAMOLED even before the Plus version, hailing it as superior even to iPhone's Retina display. I agreed the contrast is superior in an AMOLED but this is good enough for everyday uses. I have no complain with my Galaxy W.

              • ?
              • Anonymous
              • HvX
              • 09 Dec 2011

              Anonymous, 09 Dec 2011In the review of galaxy w they say that the Samsung I9001 G... moreMaybe they're still not dropping the price off in your area. Here in the Philippines, they're almost at the same price (S plus $4 more expensive).

                • D
                • AnonD-8542
                • ibm
                • 09 Dec 2011

                Anonymous, 09 Dec 2011In the review of galaxy w they say that the Samsung I9001 G... moreHello to a fellow Malaysian who bought a W.
                I thought it's a great buy for such an excellent spec. I was worried about the camera quality but it turned out pretty good, too bad Music Hub isn't available in Malaysia.

                btw, the spec here mentioned video editor but I don't have it. Anyone cares to confirm this?

                  • ?
                  • Anonymous
                  • uWC
                  • 09 Dec 2011

                  AnonD-33350, 08 Dec 2011the screen is lcd but is it scratch resistive/proof? please... moreThis phone does not have gorilla glass display.And you should use a screen protector to avoid any stratches.

                    • ?
                    • Anonymous
                    • uWC
                    • 09 Dec 2011

                    Anonymous, 09 Dec 2011In all honesty I think that review doesnt do justice to the... moreIn the review of galaxy w they say that the Samsung I9001 Galaxy S Plus costs about the same as the Galaxy W but its totally not true here in malaysia galaxy w price is around RM 900.And samsung galaxy s plus prices at RM 1200.So its price is not same and galaxy w is a very phone u wont regret buying it at all.ThX.

                      • G
                      • Gabs
                      • t7U
                      • 09 Dec 2011

                      AnonD-33254, 09 Dec 2011Galaxy W. Because Neo V only has upto 320MB of free space f... moreI agree. What's a mid-range phone with 1GHz CPU if you'll be choked with a less-than-acceptable memory to install apps.

                      Also, given that both almost have the same chipset/GPU/CPU save for the clockspeed, if the Xperia Neo V is due for a 4.0 Android upgrade, it's not that far to assume that the Galaxy W will have one too.

                        • D
                        • AnonD-33254
                        • mcu
                        • 09 Dec 2011

                        AnonD-14164, 09 Dec 2011Xperia neo v or Samsung galaxy w? Why?? Galaxy W. Because Neo V only has upto 320MB of free space for installing apps. Also Galaxy W has a faster 1.4GHz CPU compared to 1GHz of the Neo V.

                          • D
                          • AnonD-14164
                          • 3Y6
                          • 09 Dec 2011

                          Xperia neo v or Samsung galaxy w? Why??


                            • D
                            • AnonD-4761
                            • utL
                            • 09 Dec 2011

                            Why there is no "3g video call button" in the dial pad in the review done by gsmarena??????
                            while in the pre launch previews it was there. guys watch following video to confirm.
                            http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RcYUQ_VEfLc

                              • q
                              • qing
                              • 25F
                              • 09 Dec 2011

                              BinKo, 08 Dec 2011Can someone tell me if you turn your phone completely OFF a... morecannot...if u turn off ur phone , alarm won't ring in the nxt day mrng

                                • ?
                                • Anonymous
                                • sS@
                                • 09 Dec 2011

                                Anonymous, 09 Dec 2011In all honesty I think that review doesnt do justice to the... moreThe fanboy of Galaxy W :o
                                sorry neo V is a good one i think,
                                it has bravia engine , it can't be defeat with a common lcd,
                                Neo V camera's better to than Galaxy W
                                of course the sound quality,

                                about the internal memory,
                                man , how much do you want to install application?
                                1000 ?
                                lol

                                  • ?
                                  • Anonymous
                                  • mcu
                                  • 09 Dec 2011

                                  In all honesty I think that review doesnt do justice to the brilliance of this phone and may put off a lot of people from buying it. I'm writing this post with mine and the whole critcism of the screen and contrast is SO EXAGGERATED.Cmon GSMARENA its not a frigging AMOLED so what?The whole idea is to reduce the price. Galaxy S Plus costs the same because its 7 MONTHS OLD and you didn't mention IT DOESN'T HAVE AN LED FLASH!(which Galaxy W does). Xperia Neo V?You didn't that there's only 1GB internal storage with upto only 320MB free! The conclusion of the review creates the impression that all the alternatives in the market have an edge over this phone which isn't true objectively speaking. If you can live without a flash, I agree the Galaxy S Plus is better. The Neo V has a weaker processor (1GHz) and riscible internal memory and is NOT better IMHO. Also GSMArena didn't mention that in fact the Galaxy W DOES have a light sensor but its been somehow overlooked in the software build thats why there's no autobrightness. This will certainly be fixed in future updates. In short, the Galaxy W is a beter phone than was given credit for in the review and I advise anyone thinking of buying one to check it out in the shop if possible rather than judging based on the review.

                                    • G
                                    • Gabs
                                    • t7U
                                    • 09 Dec 2011

                                    Wow, reading that review only made me feel better having bought this phone, it was a good decision on my part. Thanks!

                                      • N
                                      • Nono
                                      • 36F
                                      • 09 Dec 2011

                                      "The Samsung Galaxy W I8150 passed our audio quality test with a good overall mark. It's among the quieter phones we have seen"

                                      Too bad, i love loooooud phone, so i guess i will pass. Maybe the SE Live in Walkman but its camera is bad. So probably Xperia Arc S, even if more expensive.

                                        • ?
                                        • Anonymous
                                        • P$u
                                        • 08 Dec 2011

                                        thats it i am going for Sony Ericsson Xperia neo V hell to galaxy w