Samsung I8190 Galaxy S III mini
MORE PICTURES

Samsung I8190 Galaxy S III mini

User opinions and reviews

Sort by:

  • D
  • AnonD-8044
  • nGp
  • 13 Oct 2012

To me a mini version are a smaller version of the big one with same spec,,if its got different spec its a different model range alltogether..Thats the buzz getting all the top spec into a mini version not just downsizing spec as well anyone can do that..Bloody waste of time me waiting for this,,proper SGS3 it is then.

    • ?
    • Anonymous
    • bJi
    • 13 Oct 2012

    Does s3 mini have gorilla glass ?

      • k
      • kem
      • N7D
      • 13 Oct 2012

      why are you people voting this phone so highly?? what has it got to deserve those high values?

        • D
        • AnonD-4814
        • vfx
        • 13 Oct 2012

        Arch, 13 Oct 2012 gs3 mini is the worse Samsung galaxy S3 series..... This isn't the GS3 series. It's totally different.

          • D
          • AnonD-53679
          • 04V
          • 13 Oct 2012

          kjl, 13 Oct 2012battery should be minimum 1700 mA.NovaThor chipsets are good for power saving. This battery is good.

            • ?
            • Anonymous
            • 7qy
            • 13 Oct 2012

            Shit ! gs3 mini causes lots of disturbing to iPhone5 quite mood.

              • ?
              • Anonymous
              • vaP
              • 13 Oct 2012

              Only White Color Available! What is this First Gen. i phone!

                • D
                • AnonD-2090
                • uux
                • 13 Oct 2012

                i think xperia P is a better option......

                  • J
                  • Jack
                  • IWP
                  • 13 Oct 2012

                  All the Android phone manufacturers seem to follow this herd mentality. The specs of all the flagships look very similar to each other, screen size of 4.6" to 4.8", similar quad core processors (except Sony who is stuck at dual core), same camera specs of 8 mpx (with a few exceptions)...

                  And then there is the mid market phones with single/dual core processors, 4 inch VGA screen and 5 mps camera.

                  Yaaawwnnn... No one tries to innovate anymore.

                  This phone has the potential to break that mold but Samsung decided to stick to the herd.

                  It is time someone realized not everyone who wants a small phone wants a low budget one. So stop making the smaller phones fat, slow and with outdated technology. How about making a really slim (8mm) phone with a HD 4" screen, 8 mpx camera and decent processor ?

                    • 1
                    • 19evol61
                    • v0X
                    • 13 Oct 2012

                    with that specs i might as well buy an SGS2 or an Atrix, almost same specs for virtually half the price LOL

                      • k
                      • kjl
                      • Sdr
                      • 13 Oct 2012

                      battery should be minimum 1700 mA.

                        AnonD-1846, 12 Oct 2012Oh man! Why are you trying to defend this overprice phone. ... moreThe Razr M isn't a Mini version. I would like to see the Razr M Mini's specs when if will ever come. What do you want from a Mini phone? Mini version are supposed to not be high-end, so this is meant to be a cheaper version of the GS3. Anyway, Samsung made a mistake with it's price.

                          • C
                          • Cinch
                          • Xuf
                          • 13 Oct 2012

                          Ghost !
                          This fone is going to made a big hits.
                          inspite of its inferior software quality with the big title gs3.... series.

                            • D
                            • AnonD-74275
                            • Y}Q
                            • 13 Oct 2012

                            [deleted post]Sorry I meant P... Yeah

                              • A
                              • Adit
                              • uNV
                              • 13 Oct 2012

                              It's specification are not good but I like it!

                                • G
                                • Galaxon
                                • Sbc
                                • 13 Oct 2012

                                What's the pixel arrangement?

                                  • ?
                                  • Anonymous
                                  • T3X
                                  • 13 Oct 2012

                                  What, is Samsung hoping the average consumer will not compare the specs to the S III? And thus the buyer imagines their holding a model akin to the S III but smaller? Clever marketing, to be sure. But what a risk; and, in my opinion, somewhat deceptive. With this move I have lost a bit of respect for Samsung. I would choose the Galaxy S II. And it can be found for a lower price!

                                    • k
                                    • kabeer
                                    • KS7
                                    • 13 Oct 2012

                                    AKS, 13 Oct 2012I once again repeat that every new model is inferior than p... moresamsung is just disturbing the market

                                      • ?
                                      • Anonymous
                                      • ijG
                                      • 13 Oct 2012

                                      AnonD-44103, 12 Oct 2012oh man price look to much high xperia p and htc one s or ga... morelol my samsung galaxy s 3 is almost 80000 pakistani so this must be a bit higher cost then mine cox it is lastest

                                        • D
                                        • AnonD-56946
                                        • Hku
                                        • 13 Oct 2012

                                        AKS, 13 Oct 2012I once again repeat that every new model is inferior than p... moreTrue.