Samsung I8190 Galaxy S III mini
MORE PICTURES

Samsung I8190 Galaxy S III mini

User opinions and reviews

Sort by:

  • J
  • Jon
  • mDN
  • 10 Oct 2012

S2 now has same price and better specs in every aspects: camera, screen, processor, speed, battery... Why this phone ???

    • D
    • AnonD-73749
    • u1t
    • 10 Oct 2012

    Samsung Galaxy SIII Mini will certainly be in direct competition with the world’s most advanced smart phone that is Apple iPhone 5. I was browsing and found many information with hands on review regarding this phone here : http://rodingo.com/samsung-galaxy-siii-mini-specifications-prices-and-photos-announced/308/

      • ?
      • Anonymous
      • t}a
      • 10 Oct 2012

      not worth for buying by paying more than 15k... what is special in this one?

        • ?
        • Anonymous
        • pqD
        • 10 Oct 2012

        is it me or the galaxy s3 mini has the same bezel as the nexus s? and the bug s3 has the same as galaxy nexus?

          • D
          • AnonD-60044
          • 7tI
          • 10 Oct 2012

          similar as samsung ace 2
          expected lot more.
          novathor chipset???? it sucks!!! worst ever
          expecting atleast gorilla glass
          price tag should be 18000 INR

            • h
            • hawas
            • w45
            • 10 Oct 2012

            disappoint with screen size, if 4.3 i will surely buy this shit

              • k
              • kushol
              • Khi
              • 10 Oct 2012

              gorila glass ??

                • D
                • AnonD-75136
                • Lax
                • 10 Oct 2012

                Not that much good... I think a little bit noob. But I like its design anyways XD

                  • D
                  • AnonD-69184
                  • fkV
                  • 10 Oct 2012

                  Well it does look like a GS3 mini bur only when it comes to design and software,the specs are disappointing.

                    • r
                    • rakesh
                    • t}H
                    • 10 Oct 2012

                    Its specification is lower than g s 2 but still price is higher than g s 2. Why ?

                      • r
                      • rick
                      • x%u
                      • 10 Oct 2012

                      Samsung should try harder, this not worthly of Galaxy III name, specs are even worst than S II.

                        • A
                        • Ahmed ali
                        • KIh
                        • 10 Oct 2012

                        This phone have no gpu.....:(

                          • J
                          • Jet Lee
                          • PS6
                          • 10 Oct 2012

                          I want buy this phone.....

                            • D
                            • AnonD-71586
                            • 0Un
                            • 10 Oct 2012

                            seing this phone, as it is for now, if it stays this way unless the price is smaller than the one for s2 , you would rather get s2 since it's only a little bigger and it has better specs, better features and probably better software

                              • D
                              • AnonD-56991
                              • 3Jn
                              • 10 Oct 2012

                              This is basically just a Galaxy S Advance with a similar shell to the S3.
                              And I own the proper S3 and this is just an insult to its name.

                                • b
                                • baderkw
                                • iFr
                                • 10 Oct 2012

                                no Corning Gorilla Glass ?

                                  • D
                                  • AnonD-62997
                                  • upb
                                  • 10 Oct 2012

                                  expected a lot more from samsung...:(

                                    • ?
                                    • Anonymous
                                    • IVW
                                    • 10 Oct 2012

                                    Wow, it really seems like a cheap way to sell a lot of phones by attaching the "SGS3" to this model, when its just an ENTIRELY DIFFERENT model with different specs. Shameful no?

                                      • D
                                      • AnonD-62997
                                      • upb
                                      • 10 Oct 2012

                                      if these r going to be the specs at a price tag of $515 then s2 or s advance are much better......

                                        • S
                                        • SGS advance
                                        • v0q
                                        • 10 Oct 2012

                                        The specs remind me of Samsung Galaxy S advance.