Samsung I9003 Galaxy SL
- ?
- Anonymous
- uta
- 03 Feb 2011
anything more than Rs 20k and it is very costly, outdated software, outdated processor, outdated camera, and top of that lcd!
- A
- Ashok
- 2@y
- 03 Feb 2011
What has happened to Samsung! Again a 4" mobile phone without a flash with camera? Don't they bother to read opinions or they don't give them any value?
- C
- Chris
- vGW
- 03 Feb 2011
this has to be the best full featured smartphone ever..
it gotta be around 30,000 and 32,000 as maximum(INR)..
but its worth going for one but what really surprises me are voting results.. yu got to be kidding me however i am getting one for myself..
- x
- xxx
- 4hm
- 03 Feb 2011
i agree!!! same as old galaxy s!!!! waste of time!! hahaha
- ?
- Anonymous
- L6Z
- 03 Feb 2011
i have beter idea :
http://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=3761&idPhone2=3709
- ?
- Anonymous
- Let
- 03 Feb 2011
no use to release this. same as Galaxy S
- j
- jjj
- pkS
- 03 Feb 2011
it has ti omap 3630 no samsung cpu
- ?
- Anonymous
- nsD
- 03 Feb 2011
the only reason galaxy s sold well was because of its super amoled display otherwise it has an extremely ugly and cheap plastic design, so if the superamoled is not on this phone then i think it will sell extremely bad, i prefer xperia x10 over this phone at least it has a good and classy design.the problem with samsung is design it has only has only a few phones with good design:wave s8500,omnia7 and giorgio armani,
- d
- dion
- 98q
- 03 Feb 2011
no flash, this is a crap
- ?
- Anonymous
- iba
- 03 Feb 2011
Is this screen okay?
- ?
- Anonymous
- 4Hm
- 03 Feb 2011
I'll take a Droid X over this any day.
- m
- manish
- utm
- 03 Feb 2011
well in the specifications you have mentioned that its a hummingbird processor where as in the complete review gsma rena has mentioned that it has TI OMAP 3430 chipset
well i am confused that what actualley is it having in it and yes which processor is better ??
- ?
- Anonymous
- 4TH
- 02 Feb 2011
Why all of Samsung phones look so damn similar to each other?
- ?
- Anonymous
- TRa
- 02 Feb 2011
Now fed up seeing phones with Froyo (Android2.2).
Show us the Gingerbread.... Samsung... launching same kind of phone with very minor changes.
We know Galaxy started your success story but we need to see something better...
- B
- Boki
- 0pA
- 02 Feb 2011
no matter what,it still is a kickass phone!!! i'd buy it for shore!!
- ?
- Anonymous
- pTi
- 02 Feb 2011
just compare with atrix
this is nothing
- ?
- Anonymous
- pTi
- 02 Feb 2011
nothing new !!!!
http://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=3761&idPhone2=3709
- D
- AnonD-629
- S0M
- 02 Feb 2011
Marketing strategies from Android smartphone's brands:
Smartphones running by a great software = Poor camera
Smartphones running by a great camera = Poor software
Ex:
Samsung I9003 Galaxy SL =>
Great software = Poor camera
Motorola XT720 Milestone =>
Great camera = Poor software (will not receive Froyo)
Please, check this: Look for an Android 2.2 Froyo at least with a great camera + flash xenon ...
... does not exist.
- D
- AnonD-629
- S0M
- 02 Feb 2011
Smartphones' developers are forgetting to provide better cameras + flash to last devices.
This Samsung hasn't LED flash (Xenon would be a terrible work to Samsung's developers), so if you want to take a picture in dark conditions, better bring you a lamp from your home.
- P
- Pepe
- S0M
- 02 Feb 2011
Smartphones' developers are forgetting to provide better cameras + flash to last devices.
This Samsung hasn't LED flash (Xenon would be a terrible work to Samsung's developers), so if you want to take a picture in dark conditions, better bring you a lamp from your home.