Samsung Galaxy S4 Active review: Uncharted waters
Uncharted waters
Synthetic benchmarks
The Samsung Galaxy S4 Active packs a Snapdragon 600 chipset with four Krait 300 cores clocked at 1.9GHz, 2GB of RAM and Adreno 320 GPU. Those are exactly the same specs as the I9505 Galaxy S4 has, so we're expecting identical results, within a margin of error.
Benchmark Pi pretty much describes the performance - single-threaded tasks fly on the Krait 300 core, clocked higher than the competition. By the way, the I9500 Galaxy S4 with Exynos 5 Octa posted a score very similar to its Snapdragon 600 based siblings.
Linpack actually showed an advantage for the Galaxy S4 Active, but the difference is only about 4%. Geekbench 2 also showed a similar score, within 5%. As far as CPU performance - both single and multithreaded - is concerned, the Galaxy S4 Active is one of the fastest handsets you can buy.
Benchmark Pi
Lower is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S4 Active
130 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
132 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
132 -
LG Optimus G Pro
147 -
HTC One
151 -
Sony Xperia Z
264 -
HTC Butterfly
266 -
Oppo Find 5
267 -
HTC One X+
280 -
LG Optimus G
285 -
Samsung Galaxy Note II
305 -
HTC One X (Tegra 3)
330 -
LG Optimus 4X HD
350 -
Samsung Galaxy S III
359 -
Nexus 4
431
Linpack
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S4 Active
818 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
791 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
788 -
LG Optimus G Pro
743 -
HTC One
646 -
Sony Xperia Z
630 -
HTC Butterfly
624 -
LG Optimus G
608 -
Oppo Find 5
593 -
Samsung Galaxy Note II
214.3 -
Nexus 4
213.5 -
HTC One X+
177.7 -
Samsung Galaxy S III
175.5 -
HTC One X
160.9 -
LG Optimus 4X HD
141.5
Geekbench 2
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
3324 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
3227 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 Active
3046 -
LG Optimus G Pro
3040 -
HTC One
2708 -
Sony Xperia Z
2173 -
HTC Butterfly
2143 -
Samsung Galaxy S III
1845 -
LG Optimus G
1723 -
LG Optimus 4X HD
1661 -
iPhone 5
1601
In full system benchmarks AnTuTu and Quadrant the Galaxy S4 Active scored a little lower than the regular Galaxy S4, which means performance isn't perfectly identical (there are small differences in the firmwares the two phones run, which probably explains it). Still, it's not something you're likely to notice in real-life usage.
AnTuTu
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
26275 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
24716 -
HTC One
22678 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 Active
21363 -
Sony Xperia Z
20794 -
LG Optimus G Pro
20056 -
HTC Butterfly
19513 -
Samsung Galaxy S III
15547 -
Oppo Find 5
15167
Quadrant
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
12446 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
12376 -
LG Optimus G Pro
12105 -
HTC One
11746 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 Active
11346 -
Sony Xperia Z
8075 -
HTC One X+
7632 -
LG Optimus G
7439 -
Oppo Find 5
7111 -
HTC One X
5952 -
Samsung Galaxy Note II
5916 -
Samsung Galaxy S III
5450 -
Nexus 4
4567
GLBenchmark 2.5 and 2.7 were run in 1080p offscreen mode, so results can be compared against other devices, but for the Samsung Galaxy S4 Active that's the native resolution too. The 2.5 version of the benchmark put the S4 (Snapdragon 600) and S4 Active on equal ground, while there was a 1fps difference in 2.7. Either way, there are no smartphones (Android or otherwise) that score higher, so you won't have any problems with games.
To verify that, we ran Epic Citadel, which uses the popular Unreal Engine 3. The S4 Active scored very close to the 60fps limit, meaning there were very few occasions when gaming won't be at 60fps.
GLBenchmark 2.5 Egypt (1080p off-screen)
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
43 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
41 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 Active
41 -
HTC One
37 -
Oppo Find 5
32 -
Google Nexus 4
32 -
Sony Xperia Z
31 -
Sony Xperia ZL
31 -
Sony Xperia SP
31 -
Apple iPhone 5
30 -
LG Optimus G Pro
30 -
LG Optimus G
21 -
Samsung Galaxy Note II
17 -
HTC One X
11
GLBenchmark 2.7 T-Rex (1080p off-screen)
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
17.1 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
17.1 -
Apple iPad 4
16.8 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 Active
16 -
Google Nexus 10
13.9 -
LG Optimus G
13.9 -
Sony Xperia Z
13.5 -
Sony Xperia Tablet Z
13 -
Sony Xperia ZL
12.8 -
Samsung Galaxy Note II
4.9
Epic Citadel
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
59.8 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 Active
57.5 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
57.1 -
HTC One
56.4 -
Sony Xperia Z
55.6 -
LG Optimus G Pro
54.2 -
Nexus 4
53.9 -
Asus Padfone 2
53.4 -
LG Optimus G
52.6 -
Samsung Galaxy S III
41.3 -
Oppo Find 5
38.6
JavaScript performance proved to be inexplicably lower than what the regular S4 has to offer. The Samsung Galaxy S4 Active is still a very fast device, but not as fast as it should be on this test. The BrowserMark score was within 5% of the regular S4 score.
Vellamo, which runs a whole battery of web tests, reports all is good in terms of performance, but it's a finicky benchmark, the Galaxy Note II still holds the crown there (granted it only had to render pages at 720p instead of 1080p).
SunSpider
Lower is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
804 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
810 -
Samsung Ativ S
891 -
Apple iPhone 5
915 -
Nokia Lumia 920
910 -
Samsung Galaxy Note II
972 -
HTC One X+
1001 -
LG Optimus G Pro
1011 -
Motorola RAZR i XT890
1059 -
HTC One
1124 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 Active
1196 -
Samsung Galaxy S III
1192 -
Sony Xperia Z
1336 -
LG Optimus G
1353 -
HTC Butterfly
1433 -
Nexus 4
1971 -
Oppo Find 5
2045
BrowserMark 2
Higher is better
-
LG Optimus G
2555 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
2438 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 Active
2338 -
HTC One
2262 -
Sony Xperia Tablet Z
2170 -
Sony Xperia ZL
2107 -
Sony Xperia Z
2093 -
LG Optimus G Pro
1801 -
Oppo Find 5
1797 -
Nexus 4
1794 -
Nokia Lumia 920
1774 -
Google Nexus 10
1773 -
HTC Butterfly
1475 -
Samsung Galaxy S III
1247
Vellamo
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy Note II
2418 -
HTC One
2382 -
Sony Xperia Z
2189 -
HTC One X (Tegra 3)
2078 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
2060 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
2056 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 Active
1936 -
HTC Butterfly
1866 -
Oppo Find 5
1658 -
Samsung Galaxy S III
1641 -
LG Optimus 4X HD
1568 -
LG Optimus G
1522 -
Nexus 4
1310
Reader comments
- AnonD-495136
- 30 Jan 2016
- AMj
They're not loud per se, (the do make very little noise) but I'm a very light sleeper (thank you Parris Island) and I heard my EX-gf snooping through my phone because I heard the keys in my sleep. Yup, that's why she became the EX. Only few will real...
- Caffa
- 12 Jan 2016
- 2GU
No they don't, they are a silent soft touch button. I didn't like them at first but they prove themselves underwater and have grown on me.
- AnonD-462451
- 09 Nov 2015
- t7%
Looking to purchase this active phone, one question though, are the physical buttons below the screen "loud"? As in do they "click" or "pop" when pressed? (Not through the speaker, etc, but actual noise. Thank in advance...