Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III
- m
- moonpriest01
- tha
- 04 May 2012
Samsung really fails when it comes to physical design.. The last design that caught my interest was the galaxy ace. But unfortunately the design is lil bit copied from iphone 3gs. HTC one x is better looking. I think apple has now the edge to beat the two droid flagships because the later the better. I'll pass this one and give a chance for iphone 5.
- D
- AnonD-31707
- 7tx
- 04 May 2012
Hey samsung it feels like you are blindly competing with apple. Not an impressive handheld this time it feels just an galaxy update no real galaxy.
- t
- taw
- X0%
- 04 May 2012
Crap design and nothing innovative what we expected from so much hype. it looks like a toy phone from china. or may be in india you will get a similar looking one with dual sim at merely $30. "WAKE UP" samsung.. HTC one X is far better and sexiest than this chinese model
- D
- AnonD-7586
- utd
- 04 May 2012
this phone shud reduce the price galaxy s2 to some of 400$ and it shud cost around 500$ which make the phone to sell......
- s
- saadi
- uWF
- 04 May 2012
Htc one x has beaten samsung in design with a big margin
- ?
- Anonymous
- tT$
- 04 May 2012
Anonymous, 04 May 2012im so happy hahahahahahahah you failed hahahahah xperia s ruleshehehe ,he is so unhappy from inside :P
- ?
- Anonymous
- Uew
- 04 May 2012
Really ugly design~~I'm very disappointed....
Samsung failed this time!!
- f
- far
- HIH
- 04 May 2012
it is kiddish to compare sony or htc with samsung galaxy phones, but i should confess that SIII has a very bad design. seems like someone cheating on samsung msnagers.
- m
- mohiuddin
- K6m
- 04 May 2012
thank you samsung when we find it?
- G
- Green
- 9Gm
- 04 May 2012
Anonymous, 04 May 2012what kind of war.......there is no chance for samsung......... moreSamsung has both the largest share of the cellphone market and the largest share of the smartphone market. Who's getting water for who?
- ?
- Anonymous
- K2F
- 04 May 2012
This is a great product. I'll definitely grab one. Can not wait for that.I've known more on It is great.WoW.Can not wait to grab this one.I've known more on http://www.digitechnoworld.blogspot.com/2012/05/samsung-finally-unveiled-galaxy-s-iii.html
- s
- s2
- PVH
- 04 May 2012
i have s2 and i am not impressed with s3,
there is nothing new only some hardware tweaks..
nothing more as i was expecting.
- M
- MikMik
- t7X
- 04 May 2012
the NATURE of Chinese design "very poor ugly looking" though superb in its hardware specifications. Why do samsung need to place the loud speaker on the side of camera...?
- a
- ari
- t}A
- 04 May 2012
AnonD-53224, 04 May 2012thanks Samsung .. you are the best ... are u used the phone.
- U
- UGLY UGLY UGLY Duc
- 39x
- 04 May 2012
Like all the galaxies - s, S2 and this ugly duck, they all look discusting. I dont care they use cheap materials but the way yhey combine yhem makes it look not excactly cheap but tadteless, again that shiny piece of bazel around the perimeter. . .I just KNEW that pice of sh*t would b present on yhis model like on all galaxies.
Indeed samsung employs some team of ANTI DESIGNRS and their ultimate goal is tomake the phone look UGLY UGLY UGLY. If this was yhe goal - UGLY- they have succeeded. Or - maybe and highly likely Apple is behind the "design" of this UGLY DUCK.
I would considering upgrading to this one but forget it samsung, I'm choosing HTC One S.
And if its Apple behind this UGLY DUCK, perfect job, loads of people will turn away from this UGLY DUCK thanks to its "design" no matter what ultra specs there r inside.
- J
- Jopin
- rAU
- 04 May 2012
Its agreat phone,geeks will adore it,will sell by the count of millions.but is it going to take no 1 spot in top seller chart? Answer -No.why,it dont look great.appearence do matters.
- C
- Cerberus
- nQe
- 04 May 2012
Anonymous, 04 May 2012what kind of war.......there is no chance for samsung......... moreYour grammar and your spelling is so lousy I really can't take what you writing seriously.
Go to school, then have en opinion about mobilephones.
- f
- fonrmaniac
- tUu
- 04 May 2012
hei Anonymous,
Samsung is a worthy competant in this war and its time you guys realize that. :P
- H
- Haider
- uWF
- 04 May 2012
No major change in this phone than Samsung past phones. Samsung Galaxy Note is better than S3.
- s
- stylo87
- KA4
- 04 May 2012
I dint liked phones curvy looks, y camera still 8Mp??
Rest is fine if its under $650