Samsung I9300 Galaxy S III
- R
- Rena
- 7se
- 04 May 2012
[deleted post]Stupid design, i think only Korean people like this design, i am wait i phone 5,
- D
- AnonD-29209
- utH
- 04 May 2012
isnt it exynos 4412??? nd not 4212!!
- D
- AnonD-7412
- K2F
- 04 May 2012
it is very clear that the only major difference between s2 and s3 is the processor. apps are already running very smoothly and very quickly in s2. How much better an s3 device can be ? We've already seen in desktop processors making the processing core double never makes it run twice as much fast as before. However the ppi & resolution is very high as compared to early galaxies...
- h
- h@
- Jae
- 04 May 2012
I wish that Samasung would pay more attention to detail, their designs are ugly and materials cheap, Apple, Sony, HTC are much better.
- D
- AnonD-1862
- kiN
- 04 May 2012
To me the only thing that disappoint me about the sgs3 is the design, looks like the one x will be the sexiest phone out for this year.
- J
- Jix
- Mv2
- 04 May 2012
Sorry can someone see the difference between s3 and galaxy nexus? Cz i don't see any...
Quad core processor...what for?
Graphics are the same as s2
Plys this phone is larger than s2 and galaxy nexus...unusable one-handed...
Not worth it for me...
- D
- AnonD-1319
- sUS
- 04 May 2012
gulan, 04 May 2012I think no hdmi connectivity in this phone, does it have HT... moreif you watch the unpacked event their is a hdmi cord "solds" separetly. all android phones support html5 its a "norms" and so obvius that it does need to put it in spec sheet.
- D
- AnonD-28058
- K6m
- 04 May 2012
I am sure Galaxy S2 again become popular when the peoples will see S3.
- g
- gulan
- uvt
- 04 May 2012
I think no hdmi connectivity in this phone, does it have HTML5,and not a good design,I don't know how can it perform with 64 gb internal and 64 gb memory card...lets hope for the best.
- D
- AnonD-53243
- u0w
- 04 May 2012
very disappointed with its design... samsung lost the the advantage that it gained through galaxy S2..
the name should be GALAXY S -3...it will be FLOP.
Advantage Iphone-5.
- b
- bobby
- Myg
- 04 May 2012
Why the hell is samsung doing such injustice in design. A monster device from inside but not a pinch from outside. really SO SAD samsung..
- D
- AnonD-1319
- sUS
- 04 May 2012
AnonD-23872, 04 May 2012HTC ONE X OVER S3 1 i.5 ghz quad core processor 2 S LCD 2... morethe 1.5 quadcore in htc one x is slower than the 1.4 quadcore on s III
- ?
- Anonymous
- Lxa
- 04 May 2012
ten million people bought this phone before know it, I really can not believe it..
- ?
- Anonymous
- PSL
- 04 May 2012
64GB they are telling but actually will work in phone proprly will need to see, as in SII they told 32GB but most of the phone has issue of restart after placing 32GB of microSD card.
- D
- AnonD-12498
- ttd
- 04 May 2012
one of the ugliest phone ever i see ,with cheap looking body,4.8'' is like hell and very hard to take it
specification is also dissapoinment
my xperia s and wave3 looks far far far better than this
will be flop
even sgs2 looks far better than this
super amoled is also not newer technology now
- D
- AnonD-14560
- sxd
- 04 May 2012
OK, the spec isn't too better that One X, One X all the way, the waiting is now over, Samsung made Chinese phone their flagship this year.
It looks ugly even in the ads.
- t
- tommy gun
- 2CG
- 04 May 2012
you ca not beat the galaxy s3 it is better them any phone out there, in clouding the i crap
- d
- dharmendra
- u0w
- 04 May 2012
i am disappointed with its look..
- A
- AntiOon
- uEB
- 04 May 2012
Cheap Material, Ugly, Spec Not Great, & it Too Expensive, Even Sony Design is Much Better....
- i
- imay
- PG0
- 04 May 2012
Wow....I like this phone......!