Sony Ericsson C905
MORE PICTURES

Sony Ericsson C905

User opinions and reviews

Sort by:

  • R
  • RIZ
  • RxC
  • 18 Jun 2008

wow wow wow!!!

    • ?
    • Anonymous
    • P$c
    • 18 Jun 2008

    8 megapixel... tad's wow... a true blue digicam replacement?? but then again. still no all in one solution (somewhat like the n96). wi-fi and mobile tv missin? haha. perhaps this is meant to be the n96 direct competitor

      • v
      • viperkid
      • vpY
      • 18 Jun 2008

      Anonymous, 17 Jun 2008amm... give link. i've heard that it has VGA 30fps from peo... moreim sorry to disappoint u n other fellas (like eternal_wind, paker) who believe dat C905 can do such, but Sony Ericsson C905 is not capable of recording VGA resolution videos @ 30fps

      http://developer.sonyericsson.com/site/global/docstools/phonespecs/p_phonespecs.jsp

      (and click C905 white paper, den go to pages 7 & 42)

      dat link s a more solid proof (than wat d community at esato r saying) straight from d official sony ericsson developer website

      hence, people should refrain from claiming dat C905 can record VGA 30 fps videos bcoz in reality, it's not in SE C905's vocubalary. besides, SE would've highlighted these feature in their press release f it s really capable, unfortunately - Sony Ericsson didn't, reason...

      read:
      Sony Ericsson C905 only supports QVGA (320 x 240) size video recording @ 30fps

      i know dat white papers wil b published in several revisions, n additional info n facts wil be coming in those revisions. but based on my experience n as far as wat i know, Sony Ericsson never (yet) upgraded d video capture resolution of their current devices from wat dey initially publish on white papers

        • ?
        • Anonymous
        • q{H
        • 18 Jun 2008

        its not an imitation of a N95 >_> god clearly its way better than it i say...GJ SE

          • f
          • frozenfire
          • TYW
          • 18 Jun 2008

          ammmm be cautious about how you interpret the 8mp camera- a higher pixelage does not necessarily translate into higher quality as at higher pixels, screen resolution, size and processing ll have a significant impact on the pic quality.

          anyways, good work se- working towards the goal of having cellphones as powerful as current computers in 3-5 years

            • ?
            • Anonymous
            • 4FP
            • 18 Jun 2008

            Nice Job sony an 8 mp . .. i think we should crown this one and leaf it at that . .. . nokia .. . it's time for u guys to step up to the plate .. . . the n96 is a sure disappoint ment, same ol n95 but with a hard drive . . . . . . come on step up with the features

              • ?
              • Anonymous
              • Qg{
              • 18 Jun 2008

              4r1e, 18 Jun 2008SE... why only QVGA?? It's a VGA or WVGA era....what do you mean why only QVGA? its still decent...then why isn't N96 more than QVGA? its big 2.8" screen makes it look like crap quality!

                • j
                • jameski
                • UD}
                • 18 Jun 2008

                design sucks and d display is too small..8MP in a 2.4" screen?

                and why cant SE get rid of that STUPID POP-PORT connector?it ruins the design of the phone..it's time for 3.5mm jack & micro-USB socket!!!!

                that proprietary connector which SE has been using for almost 10yrs should be abolished!!!!time for standard sockets!wake-up SE!!!!!!!

                  • P
                  • Pat
                  • PQ%
                  • 18 Jun 2008

                  Fadi, an imitation of N95? WHAT? 8MP dude, and streets ahead in the attractive stakes. N95 is just vomit. Sony-Ericsson is creature amazing, and this phone is the best thing ever made by man.

                    • J
                    • JA
                    • TIE
                    • 18 Jun 2008

                    When you say it is a copy of the N95/N96, think again. Is it symbian? Does the auto rotate works when taking pictures (well, mine does not). Does it have xenon flash or a 8MP camera? But when the G800 by Samsung was out, the pictures made the phone look small but it isn't. Is this going to be that big?

                      • 4
                      • 4r1e
                      • TS7
                      • 18 Jun 2008

                      SE... why only QVGA?? It's a VGA or WVGA era....

                        • R
                        • Richard
                        • qVP
                        • 18 Jun 2008

                        Fadi, 17 Jun 2008An immitation of Nokia N95. Come on Ericsson, you can do be... moredude this style is even better than n95! i mean its 8 mp better look and smaller. and it has wifi!

                          • H
                          • Hiro
                          • UDQ
                          • 18 Jun 2008

                          The design somehow doesn't really impressive. It doesnt look very smooth n solid despite the excellent features it has.

                            • ?
                            • Anonymous
                            • 4Bb
                            • 18 Jun 2008

                            Stand-by Up to 380 h
                            Talk time Up to 9 h

                            The battery last long! I want to know if the video recording will be in VGA 30Fps or more??

                              • r
                              • rigor_mortiz
                              • vxp
                              • 18 Jun 2008

                              SE has just raised the bar for camera phones again...it won't be long before the others start trying to catch up....

                                • e
                                • eaten
                                • vV5
                                • 18 Jun 2008

                                Go for it sony Ericsson..dont give a damm to what nokia user say.Since they are using shi* mobile phone how they can recognise good one.Nice Phone go Sony Ericsson Go

                                  • r
                                  • rigor_mortiz
                                  • vxp
                                  • 18 Jun 2008

                                  is this true? an 8 megapix cybershot? not even the coming N96 is like this.....

                                    • K
                                    • Kevin
                                    • ibb
                                    • 18 Jun 2008

                                    alrite... the conclusion is if compare C905 with N82, the N82 win its color with 16 million... other features are so close to N82. C905 just have an extra feature called A-GPS... dunno wat is tat.
                                    Hopefully its image and video quality is surprise all Nokia fans. And hope for its price is reasonable.

                                    Sample pic: http://blog.se-nse.net/2008/06/11/sony-ericsson-c905-full-size-camera-samples/

                                      • L
                                      • Lord of specs!
                                      • 4Bb
                                      • 18 Jun 2008

                                      It is just another DUMMY phone with the good camera it seems!? If course you should know that 8 mpx means nothing!? Pumping megapixels just like that while the sensor and optic size and quality remains the same has terrible effect on photo quality.

                                        • F
                                        • Fair Enough
                                        • jrY
                                        • 18 Jun 2008

                                        The C905 will be on my list. I have the K800 and the N958GB as well as the iPhone. As far as phones go, the C905 has my interest and will definately replace my K800. As far as an all around phone the N95 is great for me but the camera is not that good as some praise. The video is great on the 8gb and the pics are faster to take since i upgraded the firmware to 20.016orwhateveritis. I am one of those nuts that actually uses settings when i take pictures and don't leave it on auto so i can understand when some say that you can get pics of equal quality between the K800 and N95 considering the cybershot menu is GREAT.

                                        http://cadart932.blogspot.com is a site i made a couple years ago with K800 pics and my N95 pics aren't THAT much better. I am drooling at the chance to see what I can do with 8.1 of cybershot technology instead of that 3.2 i used making that small blog.