Sony Ericsson G900
- l
- lulu
- Rxb
- 16 Jun 2008
it nice,,,,, i love to have one,....... but why it move too slow........... can you answer me?
- d
- dreamswiper
- nCb
- 16 Jun 2008
one of the coolest mobile that sony ericcson that ever been released,ive seen it the thickenss and the weight the resolution and the specification is much more than better rather than other mobile phone.thats why id love to buy this mobile
- c
- char
- TC$
- 16 Jun 2008
@ PGcX....
earlier i stated that im curious abt the pic quality.... i pulled back my words... XD
after browsing thru the link below n in esato.... im rather happy with the pic quality. well, i must say its not the best... but its ok 4 a non-cybershot camera fone.
1 more question to all users,
how does the touch focus work? i mean how many focus point u can touch b4 u hit the shutter key?
- ?
- Anonymous
- MT%
- 16 Jun 2008
I have tried and used two G900!!!
None of them was able to produce good quality pictures - not even close to the ones posted as a sample!!!!
They are fake pictures or Sony Ericsson does not produce the same quality phones!!!!
- ?
- Anonymous
- w0Q
- 16 Jun 2008
the colors are very vibrant, the pictures would look great when you print it
- ?
- Anonymous
- w0Q
- 16 Jun 2008
sample phone photos
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=170470&start=60
enjoy!
- H
- Hex
- p$K
- 16 Jun 2008
Hi, cud any1 tel me about g900's battery life on hard use and the music player, n its music quality. Because m sick f nokia.
- m
- murders23
- kP0
- 16 Jun 2008
cmon with the review already phone been out for about a week. step it up gsmarena
- f
- fruitty
- TIE
- 16 Jun 2008
oh and one more thing i wanted to add. the picture quality is really good for not being a cyber-shot. i mean, i have a fuji cam, that compensates for the phone camera. but if you want to do quick pictures and to do some quick blogging or anything that needs a quick handycam, i am pretty satisfied with the camera, really. nothing to complain about.
2cents more =)
- f
- fruitty
- TIE
- 16 Jun 2008
Anonymous, 13 Jun 2008can anyone with this phone tell me if the music player is a... moreyup, you can scroll through the now-playing queue.
btw, i find that there are some bluetooth issues. my mac and the G900 seem to not stay connected when i want to do some file transferes. and the USB connection doesn't seem to be seen on the mac. i find that weird...
but in all, after using it for a bit more than a week, you kind of get the hang of it and you get to appreciate it. though i still find my K810i quite nice, still.
BUT! i love the business card scanner of the G900. makes things easier! and the full touch screen is useful, though i must say, the battery hours is quite bad. that can be improved, really. so, the less touch screen you use, the longer your battery lives...
my 2cents.
- ?
- Anonymous
- wYG
- 16 Jun 2008
man!!! i'm going to get it this week
- ?
- Anonymous
- wYG
- 16 Jun 2008
just look how responsive it was
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IW3kphaeYLY&feature=related
youtube on G900
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9jjzkuUyi0&feature=related
- ?
- Anonymous
- kWP
- 16 Jun 2008
Anonymous, 01 Jan 1970yes, i was originally split between the g900 and n82...so i asked some of my friends...and they thought the n82 looked ugly and fat looking
buying g900 on monday!
- ?
- Anonymous
- nR6
- 15 Jun 2008
Can someone please post some sample photos of the retail version of this phone?
Because I've only seen photos taken with a preview model and they don't look too great. I really like this phone, but the bad camera quality kinda scares me off.
- a
- abdullah khirfan
- 0ZU
- 15 Jun 2008
gonna buy it tommorow
- q
- qman
- PGc
- 15 Jun 2008
o yeah.. the quote states that similar quality pics are seen with the samsung U900 in comparison to the g900, well according to this site the u900 takes better pics than the nokia n95 so as i see it the g900's cam surely cant be that bad
- q
- qman
- PGc
- 15 Jun 2008
ok guys. to all people hating on this phone, sayin how bad the camera is go check out a comparison review of this phone against nokia's flagship camera phone(smape.com)..you will see in the comparison pics that the g900s pics still look pretty decent against the best camera phone on the market..
here are a couple quotes too (p.s. the g900 was in the comparison was a prototype and we all know the camera unit is generaly upgraded in the final unit)
'Conclusions drawn from the analysis of the camera unit employed by Sony Ericsson G900 are rather ambiguous. The camera unit yields to Nokia N82 in terms of setting variety, photo and video quality, leaving the latter the absolute leader on this front so far. On the other hand, G900 seems to be a better option as long as the camera functionality / overall functionality ratio is concerned, which is on a level with the K850i flagship. Photos of similar quality are also taken with the U900 Soul camera'
'G900 is not an ultimate cameraphone, rather taking the role of a very versatile smartphone with all-embracing functionality and a touchscreen for a chief selling point. If you try to look at it from this position, you get a very balanced solution sold at a very reasonable price. The quality of touchscreen implementation in G900 (as well as G700) is worthy of admiration – the very case where the conventional controls are complemented by the touch functions, yet not duplicated or entirely replaced. Previous UIQ models were known to alienate parts of the audience due to a total lack of conventional navigation buttons, single-handed operation combined with all-touch interface resulted in very low ergonomics and in fact quite unsatisfactory. This problem is now gone with G700 and G900 models'.
both quotes taken from smape.com
- ?
- Anonymous
- mst
- 15 Jun 2008
To ALL!
SE and all companies thrive on their image and they willing to spend big money on it.
Millions and millions of USD. Don´t you think that they can buy a few review? :)
Or they can monitor and manipulate forums etc.
I suggest to all:
Go and check out the phone and buy the very same unit once you feel that unit is good enough for you.
Do not trust reviews, forums etc. It can give you some idea what to check but the decision is yours only!
For the G900 check:
- slowness
- camera
- flash (in door pictures bad!)
- triband
- screen
- buttons / ergonomics
- look (some feel it looks cheap)
- price!!!!!
If you still like it - BUY IT!
:)
- ?
- Anonymous
- mst
- 15 Jun 2008
qman, 15 Jun 2008ok guys. to all people hating on this phone, sayin how bad ... moreQman:
bla... bla.. bla... bla..
If you like the camera so much - why don´t you buy it!
Instead you have a Samsung!
We do not need reviews anymore!
The camera is out and we all can check it out!
It has a slow processor, and a lousy camera.
N82 beats it every possible way except thickness - But some of us care about reliablity and quality more than a few mm extra thickness.
By the way, since you have a Samsung - i900 look pretty promising to me!
Another huge mistake by SE: G900 is only a triband!!!!
- q
- qman
- PGc
- 15 Jun 2008
o yeah.. the quote states that similar quality pics are seen with the samsung U900 in comparison to the g900, well according to this site the u900 takes better pics than the nokia n95 so as i see it the g900's cam surely cant be that bad