Sony Ericsson G900
- ?
- Anonymous
- M@T
- 01 Apr 2008
I can choose a mobile phone with just 256k color as long as it has a vibrant, bright display and transflective that is.
- ?
- Anonymous
- wYJ
- 01 Apr 2008
I would rather have a 16 million colors than this G900 with only 256 thousand colors. Its a big difference and matters a lot.
- I
- Immanuel_Jan
- M{3
- 01 Apr 2008
I think this is the coolest phone ever. Has everythin 1 needs. especially the tochscreen. and its cheaper than expected
- ?
- Anonymous
- 2Ap
- 31 Mar 2008
what a shame! no new added features just to boost the performance of this phone. you SE fans would better use nokia phones and explore the real essence of technology. wake up!
- ?
- Anonymous
- jW$
- 31 Mar 2008
this phone is yet to be launched. how come u se fanboys can vote for this phone so high? this phone and G810 are getting the correct rating now only.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 04}
- 31 Mar 2008
I'm a SE fan lover and just dropping by to say that please vote this phone high bec. NOKIA fan lovers are voting this phone down just to keep their NOKIA phones on the top rating and go to the N-series phone and vote them down specially Nokia N82 and N95...
- ?
- Anonymous
- M@T
- 30 Mar 2008
Not only G900 takes a beating from pathetic nokia fanboys. Even samsung G810 suffers the same.
- ?
- Anonymous
- w0Q
- 30 Mar 2008
the ratings are low because nokia fanatics tried sooo hard to take SE phones down. this phone didnt even hit the shelves yet! makes u wonder how people are able to evaluate the phone's performance.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 4tk
- 30 Mar 2008
Because, it isn't much better than one SE has out right now. Plus it ain't quadband. POS right there.
- T
- Tsepz
- N7$
- 30 Mar 2008
From a review i read it said like all other SE UIQ Wi-Fi phones it doesn't support the g-wi-fi standard,but i see the spec sheet here says it does, but this does,that doesn't change the fact that even a gaming phone from NOKIA beats an imaging SE in almost everything except the camera,lets just hope the camera doesn't have the same Green Tint bug as the P1 and W960.
G900 could have been SO much better in my opinion.
- p
- pvd
- fvx
- 30 Mar 2008
i totally agree with ryan!! this phone deserves at least higher than 8.5!
- ?
- Anonymous
- wYJ
- 30 Mar 2008
what? G900! Id rather use T100.
- ?
- Anonymous
- wYJ
- 30 Mar 2008
Im clearly disappointed with the sony ericson phones. Why is it that SE phones are weak? No Wi-fi, EDGE, or the signal reception is too slow? I believe with the comment below, not everyone needs touchscreen.
- ?
- Anonymous
- mmu
- 30 Mar 2008
Plus, the N81 has crap camera quality. So what if it records in VGA 30fps? If you have to reduce it to QVGA to make the video look decent it ain't worth a thing.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0@n
- 30 Mar 2008
read the specs it does have wifi b and g
- T
- Tsepz
- N7$
- 30 Mar 2008
N81 better in that:
Has a better battery
Faster CPU
EDGE
Wi-Fi b AND g (G900 only b)
16million colour display
3.5mm jack
A LOT more apps are availbe for it
Supports VGA 30FPS high bit rate videos etc. . . The list goes on. The G900 is running 3yearold hardware and doesnt support or can't run most of the above.
- ?
- Anonymous
- M@T
- 30 Mar 2008
Definitely better!
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0@n
- 30 Mar 2008
To Tspez
Tell me hoe your lovely N81 is better then this?
the g900 is much better then N81
- T
- Tsepz
- M@T
- 30 Mar 2008
ALX
Don't be so sure,the newer NOKIAs are very power efficient, like the phone im using: Nokia N81. It has a 1050mAh battery and a stand-by time of 420h whereas the G900 has 380h. Also NOT everyone needs a touchscreen.
Im sorry but the only nice thing about G900 is the Camera, and Touch UI but even my N81 whipes the floor with this, SE need to move away from the 220mhz weak CPU, this is why they have a longer lasting battery than some NOKIAs is because SE use slower CPUs, G900 is also missing EDGE, and 3.5mm jack so realy us NOKIA "Fanboys" arent feeling threatend at all by this already outdated phone, although im sure the Camera will be great.
- j
- joyology
- vpc
- 29 Mar 2008
Off-topic:IMO,one possible reason why the rating of this phone is low because some users may have clicked the "vote" button before rating the item since it's default is "5"... Webmaster should change the default to "-" so voters are forced to select a rating before pressing the VOTE! button...