Sony Ericsson K300
- y
- yee
- 28 Dec 2004
its no more or less than a k500, its the same,its nonsense, I dont understand..
- T
- Tsjaar
- 28 Dec 2004
Mystery Person
If you want more features on a phone,than take the K500i,K700i or near furture CXXX/KXXX
- M
- Mystery Person
- 28 Dec 2004
Ermmm.......this phone does look nicer than philips phones......I hope it have more features!!!!!
- r
- rathish
- 27 Dec 2004
hai thish model is supeb and one thing i dint get it u dind mention the price of the soney ericsson k300 if u mention it it will be so use full for us
thank you
- T
- Tsjaar
- 26 Dec 2004
"no bluetooth, low mermory space for mp3.. stupid to add the mp3 capability with such mermory.."
It's about the features for this price and segment,SE knows that to.
That's why SE release soon Clara prototype name (K900) or a new index model (CXXX)
Clara specifications.
Resolution, same 176x220 with 256K screen
Bluetooth 1.2
External memory slot MSD
limit 128MB and soon 256MB sticks
2 megapixel cam with CCD.
Intern memory 90MB or 100MB
USB connector
Just wait until 5 Januarie,the presentation from SE
- ?
- Anonymous
- 25 Dec 2004
no bluetooth, low mermory space for mp3.. stupid to add the mp3 capability with such mermory..
- T
- Tsjaar
- 25 Dec 2004
"I would get one, but I hate phones with joystick navigation.
Very Disappointing"
It's only your opinion nothing more.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 25 Dec 2004
I would get one, but I hate phones with joystick navigation.
Very Disappointing
- b
- babalola olawale
- 24 Dec 2004
this really beat down the hands of my imagination, this is indeed fortune of technology
- Z
- ZXcorr
- 24 Dec 2004
Whoa...! This is a real rival of the Siemens C65...
Which one is better?
K300 has better camera, MP3 support.
C65 has larger and better display, better addressbook, organizer, etc. and I really like the ability to zoom while viewing pictures. K300 can't do that.
- C
- Canderous
- 24 Dec 2004
If this phone were by some other company,it would cost very very little.However Sony Ericsson,Nokia and Samsung are typically of charging outrageous prices for lousy phones.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 23 Dec 2004
a good low end phone...
- C
- Canderous
- 23 Dec 2004
Lots of interesting phones out there...It's really too bad there isn't a phone modding community.I'm sure most of those hardcore PC modders could do amazing tricks with phones,such as increasing the K700i to 256MB of memory.
- S
- Sonor
- 23 Dec 2004
Let's think about this for a moment.
K700 high end phone, large memory and
Bluetooth
K500 Mid range phone, mid size memory
No Bluetooth
K300 Low end phone, mid size memory and no bluetooth
If you ask me it looks like a cheaper version on the k500.
That's all, I mean what do you expect for a low end phone. Sounds like a great phone for low end users.
- J
- Jammy
- 23 Dec 2004
Looks like great t610 SE should have released this mobile atleast a year ago why now i dont think many peoples will love it cause k700i is much better
- T
- Tsjaar
- 23 Dec 2004
"K700 suxx,,, i hate it"
It's only your opinion.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 23 Dec 2004
K700 suxx,,, i hate it
- ?
- Anonymous
- 22 Dec 2004
agree with Tsjaar... and it's a nice looking phone
- T
- Tsjaar
- 22 Dec 2004
LTN.
Afcource is the K700i better than this one but also expansiv than the K300i.
This is a low end phone and it is very differend for the target groups.
Look to the numbers,K300i,K500i and the K700i
Each phone have his own price,value,features and segment.
- L
- LTN
- 22 Dec 2004
No more feature, no more ability, more bored model from SE :(. K700i is better than this one.