Sony Ericsson W910 - User opinions and reviews

m
ming
PUM
27 Jun 2007

i am quite a serious SE fan but i do not see why some people out there keep asking for a 3.2mp camera into a SE PHONE ... why ? a 2mp is just enough for a phone ! i have a k800 & n95 , so what with the 3.2 & that pitiful 5mp on nokia ... shameless on them . k800 cannot take real 3.2mp pics with a real digital camera quality , they just have a smart software in it to enlarge the pic to 3.2mp , even shameless on nokia n95's 5mp , same enlarge software inside , it takes only a pic about 2mp & enlarge it ... i don see the importance of a high pixel from a phone . beat it , its just a phone after all ! compare a 2mp w810 & a 3.2mp k800 . same landscape mode , same spot , you get the same quality of the same size ! spot it & chill out ! 2mp camera in a phone is enough , want more ? go get a digital camera then .

Reply

S
SeF
2A3
27 Jun 2007

yeah it will be slower than W910. and i like this phone especially in black version:) it's color blending reminds me of the P910 and i fancy the autorotate UI, PSP like file manager and the excellent shaker feature. take note this is the first phone to use the JSR-256 accelerometer API and the openGl java API which means better Gaming once again:) i don't know where the 5700 excels ahead of W910 except the presence of LED Flash, audio chip(although W910 has an improved DSP chip and walkman 3.0) and symbian 9.2 OS. other aspects favors the W910 imho

Reply

?
Anonymous
w4p
27 Jun 2007

plse tell me the exact cost of this phone

Reply

G
George
PdC
26 Jun 2007

SeF:

Not to mention is slow. Remember is a smarphone. The W910 is much more faster and better user interfase too :)

Reply

S
SeF
2A3
26 Jun 2007

George:

with regards to your post, i find it to be harsh for 5700 side some may not agree especially those fans and users of the respective phone model:) but yes 5700 is still bulky and plasticky in my eyes:D

Reply

G
George
Pvq
25 Jun 2007

SeF:

Buy this. Is better. 5700 is big and bulky.

Reply

D
Darren88
MSR
25 Jun 2007

SeF if the only reason you would consider a nokia 5700 is for the symbian OS i would give up now lol. symbian is useless freezes, hangs, slow etc. etc. only reason I wont go back to nokia.

Shameful thing is nokia have known this for years and seem to be refusing to correct. Just look at N80 and N73 they are awful. Nokia bring out flagship phone in N95 and yes.... wait for it.......its still rubbish lol

Good one nokia.

Reply

g
g4
xJe
25 Jun 2007

definitely SE W910i... great design and features.. Nokia5700 looks ugly and too bulky!! hope it helps.. ;)

Reply

S
SeF
2A3
25 Jun 2007

"plz guyz im so comfused wat 2 buy a nokia 5700 or thin walkman???:S:S"

weigh in what was more important, to have symbian OS 9.2(5700) or HSDPA and shaker feature(W910) :)

Reply

J
Jack khoo
wcf
24 Jun 2007

This phone look is no bad,but 2megapixel camera is no enought,minimun 3.2megapixel la.

Reply

p
p4
Sm9
24 Jun 2007

It´s kinda funnny but in sweden the prebook price of w960 is the same with w910-470euros

Reply

E
Elahe
TuI
24 Jun 2007

This phone has Snesme future, you can play,pause,stop your music with your hand movement

Reply

M
Mohsin
PSd
24 Jun 2007

i give him 10 out 9 but camera 2 mega pix with no auto focus bad very bad SE it is to many time to launch this product pl z upgrade camera into 3 mega pix if not then add auto focus thx I Love SE WM S

Reply

u
ubribabyx
jCe
23 Jun 2007

why this phone didnt come with 400mb of memory installed like the w900 ones ????

and why didn't come with wifi support and camera of 3.2 mp ???

whyyyyyy !!!!