Sony Xperia X review: Rated X
Rated X
Performance
We already had a piece on chipsets and performance of the Sony Xperia X in our blog, but now we'll go into more detail.
The phone is powered by a Snapdragon 650 chipset. This means you get the new Cortex-A72 cores - better, faster than the A57 they replace - but only two of them. They are paired with four Cortex-A53's so the chipset is a replacement of the Snapdragon 808 (2x A57 + 4X A53). That said, this chipset is built on the older 28nm process while the Snapdragon 808 was built using the 20nm process.
Despite this fact, in multi-core CPU speed, the Xperia X does better than the LG Nexus 5X with S808, and it even matches the Xperia Z5, which uses an S810 chipset.
GeekBench 3 (multi-core)
Higher is better
-
Huawei P9
6558 -
Xiaomi Mi 5
5358 -
Sony Xperia Z5
4017 -
Sony Xperia X
3796 -
Sony Xperia M5 Dual
3554 -
LG Nexus 5X
3527 -
HTC One A9
3209 -
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016)
3061
AnTuTu 6 and Basemark OS II 2.0 have a positive view of the performance. They place it well ahead of the HTC One A9 and the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016), premium mid-rangers that compete for a similar spot as the Xperia X. It's not a flagship but it tops the Xperia Z5.
AnTuTu 6
Higher is better
-
Xiaomi Mi 5
131758 -
Huawei P9
98069 -
Sony Xperia X
77537 -
HTC One A9
60324 -
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016)
35689
Basemark OS 2.0
Higher is better
-
Xiaomi Mi 5
2180 -
Huawei P9
2068 -
Sony Xperia X
1714 -
LG Nexus 5X
1591 -
Sony Xperia Z5
1482 -
HTC One A9
944 -
Sony Xperia M5 Dual
860 -
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016)
833
The chipset also brings a new GPU - Adreno 510. It's a new generation graphics chip, and it only has to drive a 1080p screen. It's not as fast as the Snapdragon 810 graphics, but it does close to double the frames per second of its immediate competitors.
GFX 3.0 Manhattan (1080p offscreen)
Higher is better
-
Xiaomi Mi 5
45 -
Sony Xperia Z5
24 -
Huawei P9
18 -
LG Nexus 5X
16 -
Sony Xperia X
14 -
Huawei Honor 7
9.2 -
Sony Xperia M5 Dual
8.4 -
HTC One A9
6.4 -
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016)
5.7
GFX 3.0 Manhattan (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
Xiaomi Mi 5
43 -
Sony Xperia Z5
25 -
Huawei P9
19 -
LG Nexus 5X
17 -
Sony Xperia X
15 -
Huawei Honor 7
9.3 -
Sony Xperia M5 Dual
8.7 -
HTC One A9
6.7 -
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016)
5.7
Basemark X
Higher is better
-
Xiaomi Mi 5
33110 -
Sony Xperia Z5
23923 -
Huawei P9
16942 -
LG Nexus 5X
16609 -
Sony Xperia X
15087 -
Huawei Honor 7
9377 -
Sony Xperia M5 Dual
7780 -
HTC One A9
6617 -
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2016)
4947
Basemark X (medium)
Higher is better
-
Xiaomi Mi 5
35292 -
Huawei P9
29583 -
Sony Xperia X
24687 -
HTC One A9
12250
The Adreno 510 supports the latest developments in mobile 3D graphics, so we ran OpenGL ES 3.1 benchmarks as well.
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal
Higher is better
-
Xiaomi Mi 5
580 -
Huawei P9
341 -
LG Nexus 5X
306 -
Sony Xperia X
251 -
HTC One A9
132
While we would have appreciated the Snapdragon 652 (it has two extra A72 cores), the 650 offers satisfactory performance for a premium midranger. If you're after more bang for the buck, however, the price tag of the X will send you looking elsewhere.
Reader comments
- Randy
- 19 May 2020
- Pxh
I have been using sony phones since the time of T610, i have always used sony, but this is my last phn iam ever usin, batt life sucks on this device, the only thing good on this phone is the small size and fingerprint scanner, but batt really sucks.
- Anonymous
- 26 Nov 2019
- 0}k
After a little more than 2 years of use the battery - just like with most phones I've used so far - started to get worse and worse. At this point I'm charging for about 7hrs to get it to 100% while one full charge doesn't get me through an entire day...