Sony Xperia X Compact
- D
- AnonD-130233
- TfB
- 04 Sep 2016
Android tech freak, 02 Sep 2016haha wrong comment dude.this is way better than anyone coul... moreI've seen this processor in action.I had xperia x for two weeks.More lags than the 810 in my z5 compact. Especially when scrolling into menu,internet or facebook.Not a good choice if you want to move from z5c.
- D
- AnonD-130233
- TfB
- 04 Sep 2016
LadyWebz, 04 Sep 2016If you're looking to buy this phone, DON'T! Buy the Z5Compa... moreTotally agree!!! Oh,Sony, why so suicidal attitude... You really think we are so stupid? You could have more success just upgrading the z5c to the best specs,keeping the same body design.Seems like you're dying slowly...
- L
- LadyWebz
- t7J
- 04 Sep 2016
If you're looking to buy this phone, DON'T! Buy the Z5Compact instead. Now THAT is what "premium" really is.
- v
- vipin
- U$j
- 04 Sep 2016
I love the design, and size of this phone, but it should be dual sim phone.
- S
- Silvester.Gomes96
- X}y
- 03 Sep 2016
Anonymous, 03 Sep 2016Is this going to be water proof?It is waterproof don't worry :-)
- ?
- Anonymous
- amu
- 03 Sep 2016
Is this going to be water proof?
- A
- ARYAN
- pJs
- 03 Sep 2016
Fati phone,very thick design.
- D
- AnonD-380139
- JEu
- 03 Sep 2016
Gr8 job my beloved and one and only SONY. Now i know what my nedt phone will he after Z5 Compact and again with single sim :-) like.no.other
- D
- AnonD-481725
- X1I
- 03 Sep 2016
Lol xperia Z5c 410€
Xperia xc 450€ lol
- r
- rob
- mGI
- 03 Sep 2016
I was very interested before the launch, but again Sony launches a compact phone as single-SIM. I'm dissapointed.
- D
- AnonD-521036
- cNL
- 03 Sep 2016
Hi
XXC : {snap 650+32Gb+HD.d+9.5mm tick} 450 OyrO !!!!!?
Z.axon 7 : {snap 820+64Gb+2K.d+7.9mm tick} 450 OyrO ! Really equatable!!
...
- ?
- Anonymous
- P%u
- 03 Sep 2016
Reasonably Priced and worth the upgrade from Z3/Z5c w/c is actually cheaper when these past phones where first released.
I guess it's due for it not being WaterProof but no biggie since most person don't dive underwater with their phones. Note: "MOST"
- n
- nickname
- YTF
- 03 Sep 2016
my main reasons for always using a sony are the classy looks and the waterproofing.
looks are still classy. waterproofing is gone on this one.
z5 compact is still more tempting. though z5c doesnt look as good as this xc
- ?
- Anonymous
- fkV
- 03 Sep 2016
Why it is not dual sim? Why there is no use that sony listens to its fans in this particular request? Why there is no use that compact phones have dual sim variants?
- M
- MrLalala
- wrh
- 03 Sep 2016
lol no waterproof !!
- J
- Jim
- U}}
- 03 Sep 2016
Impressive specs, I think SD650 will be enough and will give the same performance as 808/810. ;)
- T
- Tann Hauser
- m@H
- 03 Sep 2016
AnonD-572359, 02 Sep 2016How is it going to sell ? Seriously are you comparing xperi... moreBrlieve me, its already worth it with that camera tech. And deducting from official whitrpaper battery measurments....itll have above 90 hr endurance, at least by measure tehniques here.
But even X and XP are better than what results here were shown.
- D
- AnonD-404798
- d%{
- 02 Sep 2016
XperianFanboy, 02 Sep 2016Honestly, i hate the front design of this phone, the speake... morespeakers*
- D
- AnonD-404798
- d%{
- 02 Sep 2016
AnonD-572359, 02 Sep 2016It has impressive specs for a phone that small. People mowa... moreagree it's excellent small phone , and probably the best in this size range ... I myself wouldn't underestimate SD650 , 3gb of ram and 720 screen just yet ... this could be quite powerful phone and comparable to all current flagships in terms of performance .
- D
- AnonD-572359
- nD$
- 02 Sep 2016
AnonD-404798, 02 Sep 2016it's X Compact , not XZ compact . I think it's reasonable m... moreIt has impressive specs for a phone that small. People mowadays want 8gb ram sd 821 , godlike camera ( dslr quality if possible ) and a big battery to last 5 days all of that in one small body and all for the smallest price possible. This phone will probably be 450 euro compared to xz which is 700 euro. Ofc there is a difference since the price is different. But again we will have to wait for a review and see why they chose 652 over 820 ( maybe it improves battery and 820 is overkill for 720 p screen ). I dont think Sony is going lazy just because it does not have competitors in this area. Maybe there is sone logic behind this . Seriously a 450 sony device with these specs is not bad at all.