Sony Xperia XA1 review: Square one

Square one

GSMArena team, 06 May 2017.

Final words

The Xperia XA1 is another of those Sony products that get a 1 suffix for the second generation, making it difficult to count the iterations as the years go by. But hey, who cares about last year?

Sony Xperia XA1 review

The Xperia XA1 builds on the strengths of its predecessor and improves exactly where needed - in performance, battery life and the camera department. Despite the fact that there are a few things we would have probably done differently given the chance, it's a pretty good midrange handset.

The updated design does come with a caveat - the phone is only marginally wider than its display, but boy is the thing tall. And no, it's not like the Galaxy S8, where that the added height is used by the screen, either - it's still a regular 5-incher. And there aren't even stereo speakers to account for all that vertical space. Then again, the taller body aspect ratio certainly feels nice when you are holding the phone to your ear.

Performance is very good within its class, due to the improvements that the new Mediatek Helio P20 brings (the low display resolution has certainly helped). The display itself has lost some of its contrast this year, but isn't half bad overall. Battery life is also an incredible improvement over the predecessor considering that the chipset is more powerful and the battery capacity is the same.

And to top it off, there's the 23MP camera Sony used to fit in a number of flagship devices (the entire Z5 family and then a few of the new upper-end X-series), yet never quite managed to extract flagship-grade image quality out of it. Well, we'd say this is the closest it's gotten to that mark - we'd pick the XA1's images over the XZ's in a heartbeat, despite the fact that they come from the same sensor.

Sony Xperia XA1 key test findings

  • High-quality build, which looks and feels premium both around the sides and on the back. We noticed the back is easier to scratch than we're used to. The narrow body adds comfort in single-handed use. The massive chin and forehead may not be everyone's cup of tea but they make for an unusual body aspect ratio which works well for voice calls.
  • The display is above average in maximum brightness; contrast is a downgrade from the XA, but still acceptable; we wish the colors on the screen had more punch; color accuracy is average but acceptable. The 720p resolution is reasonably sharp on the 5-inch diagonal.
  • The user experience is typical Xperia - near-stock Android, extensive theming support, few added features (there's the Stamina battery saving modes, but the file manager is buried deep). We appreciated Sony's multimedia apps the most. TrackID nicely complements the FM radio.
  • The Helio P20 chipset is a snappy performer in both CPU and GPU-intense tasks, with the 720p resolution helping in the latter. Its performance is on par with the likes of Snapdragon 625, Exynos 7880 and Kirin 658 and it's also nicely power efficient in comparison to the Helio P10.
  • The single loudspeaker is on the quiet side and falls in the Average category in our test. We miss the stereo speaker setup found on more expensive Sony phones.
  • The 23MP primary camera shows improved processing and better noise properties compared to its Xperia XZ days. The corner softness is almost gone too. Colors are accurate and the dynamic range is adequately wide. There's resolved detail to spare and overall, we were pleased with the results, especially at the phone's price point.
  • The 8MP front-facing camera has a fixed focus distance of slightly less than a full arm's length so keep your mug a little closer and you'll get the most out of it sharpness-wise. Turning off the skin smoothing completely requires switching to manual mode too - worth keeping in mind as all selfies in Auto will have beautification on. Selfie image quality is not really good in low light.
  • The 1080p videos are disappointing when it comes to image quality - they turned out quite soft and noisy. The dynamic range is good, though.

You're not strapped for alternatives, and a lot of them come from Sony's own lineup. Last year's Xperia XA will net you about 40% savings compared to the XA1, but you'd be getting an inferior chipset, battery life and camera, and less storage and RAM. Probably a design that's easier on the eyes though, but that's just us.

The Xperia X is another Sony 5-incher, this one positioned higher up the ladder, and costing some 20% more than the XA1. The extra money secures a higher-res 1080p display, and a 13MP front-facing camera where the XA1 only has 8MP. Oh, and a fingerprint scanner on the side. Still no waterproofing or 4K video recording, though.

Alternatively, you can go for the Xperia X Compact - if you're eyeing up the XA1, pocketability is probably a priority, and the X Compact delivers. Though, obviously, its 4.6-inch display is smaller, duh. And the X Compact is a bit pricier, about as much as the X proper.

Sony Xperia XA Sony Xperia X Sony Xperia X Compact
Sony Xperia XA • Sony Xperia X • Sony Xperia X Compact

For the Xperia XA1's price you can grab a Xiaomi Mi 5, or a Mi 5s (for a few extra bucks), and those two are proper flagships with top-class silicon inside. You'd get a (marginally) larger, higher-res display, Snapdragon 820 (821 in Mi 5s' case) with all the performance benefits that bring, not to mention the better future proofing. These Xiaomis can also record 4K video, which is out of bounds for the XA1. What you won't be getting is pure Android - Xiaomi's MIUI is anything but stock.

Xiaomi Mi 5 Xiaomi Mi 5s
Xiaomi Mi 5 • Xiaomi Mi 5s

The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) would require stretching your budget a little further, but comes with better battery life and a 5.2-inch FullHD display against the XA1's 5-inch 720p LCD. There's also a fingerprint reader on the A5 (complete with Samsung Pay, if you have that where you are), and the phone is IP68-rated. Again, however, it is more expensive.

Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)
Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017)

The Moto G5 and G5 Plus are viable options too, the former catering to a tighter budget, while the Plus matches the XA1's price. Both Motos have 1080p displays, and the non-Plus has a removable battery (which you may or may not appreciate). The Moto G5 Plus can record 4K video (though this seems to be region-dependent). Also, both G5s have fingerprint readers, unlike the XA1. Bezels and all, we'd still lean towards the XA1 for looks.

Motorola Moto G5 Motorola Moto G5 Plus
Motorola Moto G5 • Motorola Moto G5 Plus

If you can spare a little extra cash, you can pick the Huawei nova, too. Whether the 4K video and 1080p display are worth the premium is up to you.

Huawei nova
Huawei nova

To be honest, we were skeptical at first of the Xperia XA1 - a boxy device, trying to ride the compact train, and its major upgrade is the power-efficient chipset and a camera we've been less than thrilled with on previous occasions. In reality, it turned out that the XA1 dials up the specs in all departments that matter, it scores points for its understated looks and premium build quality, and gets a good punch out of a sensor that was until now barely given a chance to shine. Is this another surprise Xperia favorite? Looks like Sony has got things right in the midrange, again.

Reader comments

  • Varun
  • 11 May 2021
  • gMB

Never ever buy this one

  • Ram
  • 10 Oct 2020
  • HjB

I feel you bro... Same problem... Great phone.. But the toushcreen is garbage

barely used it, never dropped, brand new... came in with many problems/errors/defects such as compass not working, or GPS not very good. Touch screen stopped working on sides after a few months making it nearly impossible to use. Constant crashes. Un...