Sony Xperia XZ
MORE PICTURES

Sony Xperia XZ

User opinions and reviews

Sort by:

  • ?
  • Anonymous
  • Hs6
  • 12 Nov 2016

Tann Hauser, 12 Nov 2016Here's a dictionary for ya: https://www.dxomark.com/About/... moreDxoMark is not perfect either. And their smartphone camera reputation is somewhat questionable. Personally, I stick with the bigger respected smartphone reviewer sites. They are very experienced with camera testing. Most people and myself only use auto mode. If you need better, then use a proper camera. Sony has great camera sensors, but its software isn't the best

    • F
    • Farzin
    • Lhf
    • 12 Nov 2016

    Hi guys, please tell me which one is better including all features? Sony XZ, Sony Z5 premium or LG V20? tell me your reasons pls.

      • ?
      • Anonymous
      • tAT
      • 12 Nov 2016

      Tann Hauser, 12 Nov 2016Here's a dictionary for ya: https://www.dxomark.com/About/... moreSony Xperia XZ has no test with DxOMark yet. At present Google Pixel phone is the best and unlikely to be toppled.

      Your claim that Sony Xperia XZ is as good as a DSLR camera just shows your ignorance.

        • ?
        • Anonymous
        • thv
        • 12 Nov 2016

        looks ugly from all directions

          MirzaSohail, 11 Nov 2016Today I received 88 MB andriod system update for my XZ in U... moreHere:
          https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=v-4Bl-877cM

          Seems an ecellent update ;-)

            [deleted post]Here's a dictionary for ya:
            https://www.dxomark.com/About/What-is-DxOMark
            Learn it well.

            And after that, tell me about exact standardized scientific camera test protocols of this here site.

            Inpatiently Awaiting your input on the subject.

            P.s. Just for the sake of it, I prefer X Performance auto photo camera postprocess more than XZ. XZ has its own strenghts tho.

              AnonD-600084, 12 Nov 2016First of all ,is i dont even know who is tan hauser,so dont... moreDxo mark is an industry standard for camera quality testing.
              Main problem is its standards are dslr camera based, not some-phone-rev-personal-opinion based.
              Phone camera revs made pixelpeeping and only certain camera aspects standard, neglecting most other aspects.
              Proof is here, compares offered by crops only insted of 1:1 photos, as if crop is a camera standard and not the actual shot.
              Therein remains the problem, people value their own opinions most, so standardised measurments dont mean squat to them.
              Make a compare of any phone to a dslr camera, and Xperias remains the closest to those dslr reproducing standards. Pixel closest now tho, but obviously XZ better except in dynamic range part.

                Anonymous, 12 Nov 2016Will you pay for that Specification on that time? The Casio... moreJust read his bull.
                " first waterproof android phone" !?!
                A what?
                Guess Android is part of phone build design in his head obviously....
                Hes just trying too hard without relative substance.

                Alais, Sony made also first waterproof 3.5mm jack, first waterproof powerbutton and first waterproof microUSB jack, thats waterproof design innovation at its best. Sony remains industry standard for IP certification on a mobile phone. Others can only copycat.

                  • ?
                  • Anonymous
                  • ib6
                  • 12 Nov 2016

                  Sony's build quality has been going down the drain recently, even with the XZ. Sure the alloy metal back is fancy but not practical when the rest is made up of plastic. Realised my XZ doesn't lay flat on a flat surface and discovered a slight bend to the top corner. This wouldn't happen if it had all metal body. Been a Sony since past few years and this is quite disappointing since the price also doesn't justify its worth. This will be my last Sony phone..

                    • ?
                    • Anonymous
                    • Xug
                    • 12 Nov 2016

                    Anonymous, 11 Nov 2016lol, sadly their cemeras are better than sony.Yes sadly but you just said that sony is bad luck and according to what I have seen is most smartphone camera are from Sony.. So it mean they took it from Sony and so become popular right?

                      • A
                      • Annie
                      • Xug
                      • 12 Nov 2016

                      Anonymous, 11 Nov 2016To livefearless and Tann Hauser (same person, can tell by l... moreI'm not Tann nor anyone who used to be here in GSM but I have seen with my eyes the image taken from s7, g5,xz and that why I won't believe that xz is inferior. It's superb according to me and I won't believe people who quarrel without seeing myself.

                        • D
                        • AnonD-600084
                        • PS6
                        • 12 Nov 2016

                        Anonymous, 11 Nov 2016To livefearless and Tann Hauser (same person, can tell by l... moreFirst of all ,is i dont even know who is tan hauser,so dont acuse that i is the same guy,i have my own opinion,he have his own opinion

                        second,i prefer dxomark and youtube reviewer,they have much live result,better that just showing only imagine

                        third,you are the one thay so hard to admit xz have good camera,i prefer you go try it yourself,it much even better than beliving from mix review and biased

                          • ?
                          • Anonymous
                          • vV5
                          • 12 Nov 2016

                          Anonymous, 12 Nov 2016Will you pay for that Specification on that time? The Casio... moreThat is only Sony, they are whole-heartedly in making water-resistant smartphones.

                          I am sure Sony is ahead the competitors in waterproof smartphones. But, I don't know why some competitors making waterproof have to sacrifice the 3.5mm earphone jack to lightning port and some of them stay using cheaper mono speaker, they are shame/flaws in waterproof design.

                            • ?
                            • Anonymous
                            • vV5
                            • 12 Nov 2016

                            [deleted post]Will you pay for that Specification on that time? The Casio G'one is such an antique and it is IP67 only. Nowadays all water-resistant smartphone come with IP68, how could you live in yesterday?

                            Sony making less smartphone but most of it with well design and premium quality, more than 20 and above are water-resistant smartphones, go and research yourself which company is rich experience in making water-resistant smartphone. You can't find one.

                              [deleted post]The Casio is the first making IP68 water-resistant smartphone? How many water-resistant smartphones they are make? Does it have great camera, great sound, great connectivity and gorgeous solid premium build?

                              The water-resistant must have the design and the technology change with each passing day, that why come out with IP68 water-resitant. The Sony making over 20 water-resistant smartphones including entry mid-range and flagships, they have rich experience in design water-resistant smartphone compare those speculators(competitors) nowadays .

                                • D
                                • Dredd
                                • teX
                                • 11 Nov 2016

                                [deleted post]Sony was the first phone to have a 4k screen
                                Sony was the first phone to implement 5 axis stabilisation
                                All Samsung does is copy and explode. Never really made anything innovative. Nobody needs a heart rate monitor on a damn phone!
                                Nobody needs a curved screen and an iris scanner. All unnecessary gimmicks!

                                  Anonymous, 11 Nov 2016To livefearless and Tann Hauser (same person, can tell by l... moreYoure right. I have to admit.
                                  Sonys 23 mpx camera with 5 axis stabilisation and triple hybrid focus leaves all other in dust.
                                  As shown by multiple links here.
                                  Youd have to know how to use manual for lowlight tho.
                                  But then again manual is a feature that typical "jack knows it all" never ever uses.

                                    Anonymous, 11 Nov 2016There's a difference though. The Casino and Samsung phones ... moreHe is all sammy fanboy BS.
                                    Sony was first real phone manufacturer with waterproof phone.
                                    Casio in 2005, respect. But Casio is a clock manufacturer.
                                    Nokia, motorola and other japanese followed...
                                    His beloved Samsung was second last in line, just now apple "copied"
                                    He cant handle the truth.

                                      • D
                                      • AnonD-481725
                                      • X1I
                                      • 11 Nov 2016

                                      Anonymous, 11 Nov 2016To livefearless and Tann Hauser (same person, can tell by l... moreYes it is so hard, personally, i don't like to be a lier, ever.

                                        • ?
                                        • Anonymous
                                        • J7R
                                        • 11 Nov 2016

                                        [deleted post]There's a difference though. The Casino and Samsung phones were obviously very ugly. Aesthetics were clearly compromised in those phones.
                                        Probably Sony was the first manufacturer to make a waterproof phone with zero compromise in terms of design.
                                        How can you tell Sony copied them? That's purely BS.