Sony Xperia Z Ultra
- D
- AnonD-160866
- v{u
- 01 Jul 2013
6.5 mm thin , but really shitty thing is 179.4 tall 92.2 wide, thats cheating on thickness
- e
- eu
- pqB
- 01 Jul 2013
*Qualcomm says it consumes less with 50% than the 600
- D
- AnonD-129693
- m0@
- 01 Jul 2013
Tcool, 30 Jun 2013Ok fine as you said considering with current flagship devic... morecompared to ultra,s4 active is a midrange phone,so please stop trolling.
- R
- Rex
- TSF
- 01 Jul 2013
GERTI, 28 Jun 2013poor battery so shame....
how do you know battery is poor??
snapdragon might be a power efficient processor :P
- J
- JondorZ
- Pxy
- 01 Jul 2013
Spec Mistake: It's IP58: 1.5 meter under fresh water for 30 mins. Not 1 meter.
- C
- Christy
- tZj
- 01 Jul 2013
Nice specs tho. Can't wait for this to arrive my country. Ive been using Samsung S2, S3 and now S4, but I traded in my S4 for Xperia Z, I realize Sony has much more stable software & hardware. Well done Sony Keep up!
If wanna complain much then create a paper phone under yr own imagination. xD
- D
- AnonD-126413
- uvv
- 01 Jul 2013
m.m.h, 30 Jun 2013why did sony reduce it's camera resilotion from 13MP to 8MPThey are completly out of stock of 13 MP cam for some time
- D
- AnonD-101901
- Kg%
- 01 Jul 2013
I think HDR can replace flash in some areas while taking pictures and using flash at night are not very helpful..
- k
- kamikazi
- HIj
- 01 Jul 2013
ehm im not a sony hater! kinda fan a little bit but i think this phone is 40% fail! lol
oh ye use pencil on ur phone!it gonna make it full of scratch!
no flash? wth! btw not so useful but totaly a fail! btw i love that sony is trying to give the user a phablet-tablet feel:) a awesome fell not a big phone!and wow haha fast
- d
- dei
- th1
- 30 Jun 2013
insane thicness
- k
- kranz
- U$4
- 30 Jun 2013
A flagship phone with no flash... Disappointing
- T
- Tcool
- FBv
- 30 Jun 2013
AnonD-116639, 30 Jun 2013Well if considering with current flagship devices then s4 a... moreOk fine as you said considering with current flagship devices then Xperia Z Ultra is also a thick brick at 6.5 mm.
Eat this: http://www.siliconindia.com/gadget/news/Worlds-Thinnest-Smartphone-Has-A-New-Name-Umeox-X5--nid-149705.html
- m
- m.m.h
- fki
- 30 Jun 2013
why did sony reduce it's camera resilotion from 13MP to 8MP
- M
- Mohan
- 7qB
- 30 Jun 2013
Display, 28 Jun 2013Which one has the better display? 1) Triluminos (Z ... more1
- o
- oxo
- PSv
- 30 Jun 2013
If this device price is around 600-700 usd I think ill gonna take it but its over 700 euro. I think thats too much!
- D
- AnonD-116639
- U@T
- 30 Jun 2013
Tcool, 30 Jun 2013Ok, but 9.1mm is bulky to you?Well if considering with current flagship devices then s4 active is a thick brick at 9.1 mm.
- C
- Confused
- 6k9
- 30 Jun 2013
Is this supposed to be a phone... Or a tablet? I mean, dont get me wrong, it seems like quit a nice phone... But im not sure if we ca really call it a...phone...
- D
- AnonD-160594
- T33
- 30 Jun 2013
Again, another phone as huawei mate has no hardware buttons so not for me,but phablet looks perfectly
- E
- ERENE
- N9@
- 30 Jun 2013
This phone would have been beta if sony had install flash
- D
- AnonD-159013
- j0c
- 30 Jun 2013
Exclusive Art is Ultra.