Xiaomi 15 Ultra MORE PICTURES

Xiaomi 15 Ultra

User opinions and reviews

Sort by:

  • S
  • Sam9teen
  • vIb
  • 15 Nov 2025

Anyone started receiving HOS3 updates here in India??

    • P
    • P C M
    • XZt
    • 05 Nov 2025

    NeonHD, 05 Nov 2025Whatever makes your day, kidYeah, that may be it. You are just an old guy. That's why your knowledge about cameras are so outdated.🤣

      P C M, 04 Nov 2025Should have started with that excuse. Now you cant hide you... moreWhatever makes your day, kid

        • P
        • P C M
        • XZt
        • 04 Nov 2025

        NeonHD, 01 Nov 2025That's a whole lot of shit talk for someone who isn�... moreShould have started with that excuse. Now you cant hide your ignorance and coming up with all that shitty excuses. 🤣

          • a
          • atb
          • BiN
          • 03 Nov 2025

          The Xiaomi 15 Ultra receive right now Hyper OS 3 update here in Norway i guess it is also out in Europe right now so those who have the Xiaomi 15 Ultra in Europe should look at their phone for this update .

            P C M, 01 Nov 2025Are you total st*pid or what !!! Can't you read?? I ... moreThat's a whole lot of shit talk for someone who isn't the even original commenter of the comment I was replying to.

            Aside from your obvious condescending attitude that no one asked for, yes I do know that full frame does better at high ISO. And in hindsight I admit I did contradict myself there.

            Honestly I've already lost track what the point of this conversation was. My main point really was to poke at the faulty logic from Xperia1V that "you use a dedicated camera for photography, not a smartphone". No I'm not trying to outsmart people. Btw, stupid isn't a censored word, stupid.

              • P
              • P C M
              • XZt
              • 01 Nov 2025

              NeonHD, 01 Nov 2025I'm afraid your last statement also suggests a lack of... moreAre you total st*pid or what !!!
              Can't you read??
              I know what it does to the photo.. That's why it was my secondary suggestion, not primary, primary suggestion was changing lens.
              Also it shows another lack of your knowledge by trying to show further knowledge.
              Just searching and copying text doesn't make you a smart person when you lack the basics.
              Now about the high ISO and noise. I guess you don't know that full frame sensors are very much capable of handling high ISO, it's not a tiny sensor that high ISO will result in unusable photo . Also you certainly don't need to rely on using high ISO if you have a full frame. Even at f12 and at 1600 ISO even in the dark you will get a clear nice picture if you know how to control shutter speed. Hell, you can even do it at ISO 400 and still come out with a good(not the best) night time picture.

              Like I said, you're and ignorant trying to outsmart other people with your faulty logic.

                P C M, 31 Oct 2025Are you sure you yourself know about photography before acc... moreI'm afraid your last statement also suggests a lack of understanding.

                If you narrow down the aperture on a full-frame camera, you'll have to raise the ISO very high in order to get a usable photo, which results in more noise.

                APS-C cameras are better in that regard, but is still relatively bad.

                Only when we get to something like a m43 camera that we can achieve a deep depth of field without narrowing the aperture that much, which means you don't have to raise the ISO that much to get a usable photo. Sure, you lose out on slightly more blurry background, but how important is that really?

                What I'm saying is—and honestly it's confusing to even keep track of what my original point was—is that full frame cameras have its advantages, while small sensors have theirs.

                But going too small obviously means you get crappy image quality. So how big can you go, while still staying small? I argue that 1 inch is the sweet spot. The LYT900 clearly has better image quality than, say, the LYT800 (1/1.4”).

                Therefore, I argue that it is worth getting the 15 Ultra just for the cameras alone.

                It is better than flagships that use smaller sensors, and it's still small enough that makes it completely separate than a professional camera, and therefore cannot be compared to it.

                BTW, it is mainly the OEM's decision in making the camera island bigger than necessary. I am certain they could've made the camera island less bulky even with a 1 inch sensor, if they wanted to.

                  Anonymous, 12 Oct 2025LYT-900 is actually 0.98", so not exactly 1". Tha... moreFrom how I interpreted that same information, 1/0.98" as you are referring to is '1 divided by 0.98', is it not? And that would amount to 1.02 inches.

                  We can use LYT800 as another example, which has a 1/1.4” sized sensor. First of all, it's obviously known that this sensor is smaller than LYT900. And if we actually do "1 divided by 1.4", it equals to 0.71 inches, which is obviously smaller than 1 inch.

                  I will happily admit to being wrong, but I don't think I am mistaken in this case...

                    Gsm you forgot to add atpx lossless, LDAC, LC3, auracast and ASHA as codec support, you always do this to Chinese brands (missed out specs on old mate 10 pro and p40 pro AND oppo find x5, you add every possible feature on Samsung and apple so c'mon).

                      • P
                      • P C M
                      • XZt
                      • 31 Oct 2025

                      NeonHD, 05 Oct 2025Did you read my comment? It is 100% an apples to oranges co... moreAre you sure you yourself know about photography before accusing others?
                      You lack even the simplest understanding.
                      Theoretically if you use the same lens for bigger sensor you will get shallower depth of field a lot. But this is not a phone camera, I'll let you know. You can change the lens. That's how camera works actually. Even with the same lens you can just narrow down the aperture to low and still get clear full size image from a fast 1.8 lens.

                        NeonHD, 05 Oct 2025Did you read my comment? It is 100% an apples to oranges co... moreStop down the aperture then, get a slower lens, use a bridge camera. There's options on dedicated cameras.

                          Mark97762, 22 Oct 2025Nice! But why is it 50MP?? it has supposted to be 108/200MP... more108 MP is less flexible. They used it years ago in the Mi Note 10 and Mi 11. Good for daylight, not so good elsewhere. 200MP is hysterical marketing gimmick, defaults to 12MP binning and hasn't anywhere close to the optical clarity to reproduce even a sixth of the native resolution

                          50MP has larger native pixel size for the same sensor size, and the better flexibility. In part due to the 8K gimmick.

                          In all honesty, 24MP is all the resolution needed for all smartphone camera sensors, and the native pixels would be even larger and even better for both photos and video up to 6K - meaning there would be room to crop and still produce a native 4K video. Not a single phone has the lens quality good enough to benefit from higher resolution.

                          Gimmicks and marketing sways so very many, and ultimately causes our products to be worse than what they could be.

                            Nice! But why is it 50MP?? it has supposted to be 108/200MP, and why is only 5000+ mAh??

                              • ?
                              • Anonymous
                              • pd%
                              • 21 Oct 2025

                              Xiaomi at that expensive price I don’t get it
                              OV sensor seriously…. No decent glass , xiaomi OS worst of the worst. heavey, very cumbersome design
                              Only main sensor and snapdrgon but with that OS…

                                • S
                                • SonicGamerRBLX
                                • ppw
                                • 16 Oct 2025

                                This phone is absolutely insane. It can literally demolish almost all games on mobile. Possibly even high graphics! 🤯

                                  • ?
                                  • Anonymous
                                  • HK4
                                  • 12 Oct 2025

                                  NeonHD, 07 Oct 2025True, but we're talking 23-27mm focal length here. A 2... moreLYT-900 is actually 0.98", so not exactly 1". That Sensor size is exactly 13.2x8.8mm, stop spreading FUD.

                                  https://www.sony-semicon.com/en/info/2023/2023061501.html

                                    • G
                                    • Gidre
                                    • Ea7
                                    • 12 Oct 2025

                                    Not gonna lie if I have a lot of money, this phone will be in my first list to buy. I mean look at that all, you can play heavy game, take a photos, Just perfect.

                                      Luense, 06 Oct 2025Depth of field is depends on your lenses, not your 1" ... moreTrue, but we're talking 23-27mm focal length here. A 23mm lens on an APS-C sensor is much more shallower at F1.8 compared to the same focal length and f-stop on a 1-inch sensor.

                                      The LYT-900 is actually slightly bigger than 1 inch, I'm not sure what you watched.

                                        • p
                                        • phonman
                                        • XNt
                                        • 06 Oct 2025

                                        Xperia1V, 28 Aug 2025Why would you buy a mobile phone for its limiting cameras? ... moreSO true.......

                                          1 of 35