Xiaomi Poco M7 pro 5G
- ?
- Anonymous
- m}R
- 8 hours ago
Mik3, 10 hours agoPoco M7 Pro is the same as Redmi 10X Pro (released in June ... moreThis phone seems to be a rebadged Redmi Note 14.
- ?
- Anonymous
- gXJ
- 9 hours ago
Anonymous, 13 hours agoPhone looks great except for the 3.5 jack. I will never buy... moreWe want the headphone jack, it adds nothing to the price of the phone.
- S
- SonyAdmiral
- XFy
- 9 hours ago
Mik3, 10 hours agoSame as Redmi 10X Pro (released in June 2020) but without t... moreLol hope you're joking, the M7 pro has no chance against 10X
- M
- Mik3
- GXs
- 9 hours ago
DarlingYext, 10 hours agoAbsolutely not the same, that phone had a way better camera... moreYes, ok, also take away the telephoto cam from Redmi 10X Pro.
- DarlingYext
- 6mM
- 10 hours ago
Mik3, 10 hours agoSame as Redmi 10X Pro (released in June 2020) but without t... moreAbsolutely not the same, that phone had a way better camera setup, but only a 60hz display, not comparable at all.
- M
- Mik3
- GXs
- 10 hours ago
Anonymous, 15 hours agoNo the specs are perfect. The only thing that's bad th... moreSame as Redmi 10X Pro (released in June 2020) but without the ultra wide camera.
- M
- Mik3
- GXs
- 10 hours ago
DarlingYext, 14 hours agoThe display is the only good thing about this phone. aside ... moresame screen as Redmi 10X Pro released in June 2020
- M
- Mik3
- GXs
- 10 hours ago
Anonymous, 13 hours agoPhone looks great except for the 3.5 jack. I will never buy... moreA phone without an audio jack is not a street phone.
- M
- Mik3
- GXs
- 10 hours ago
egypt alexandria, 15 hours agoits same as redmi note 14 but without camera ultra widePoco M7 Pro is the same as Redmi 10X Pro (released in June 2020) but without the ultra wide camera.
- ?
- Anonymous
- r3c
- 10 hours ago
What is pro about this phone?
- R
- Robjak
- JH1
- 12 hours ago
Anonymous, 15 hours agoNo the specs are perfect. The only thing that's bad th... moreThe quest for a good phone is not competing with Samsung or Apple. The quest for a good phone is to find consistency and will to make the best phone in any price bracket, any market, any niche, any value at any time. Xiaomi only cares about numbers and not about making the best phones. 170 for a phone with a weak second rear camera is pretty bad. What the world has is a 3 headed dragon (Xiaomi, Samsung and Apple) that no one is able to fight. There is no real competition. This phone will have no OIS where it would be necessary. It will be the billionth phone good for still photography, casual to low gaming and low reliability. What the world needs is a extremely high speced phone under 150 even under 100. Xiaomi could do that, but they don't want to. They want you to pay more. I will not pay.
- ?
- Anonymous
- m}R
- 13 hours ago
Phone looks great except for the 3.5 jack. I will never buy a phone with a friggin 3.5 jack ever again, just a waste of space and money.
- Agrt
- KLS
- 13 hours ago
Another D7025. Is this this phone capable of recording in 60 fps?
Better IP rating and HDR10+ better than last model but downgraded charging speed.
- DarlingYext
- 6mM
- 14 hours ago
Anonymous, 15 hours agoNo the specs are perfect. The only thing that's bad th... moreThe display is the only good thing about this phone. aside from the looks. Lmao
- e
- egypt alexandria
- CI0
- 15 hours ago
its same as redmi note 14 but without camera ultra wide
- ?
- Anonymous
- Sr6
- 15 hours ago
DarlingYext, 17 hours agoLooks good but the specs are bad.No the specs are perfect. The only thing that's bad that's the cheap OLED screen that's mediocre at best. If it had an excellent IPS LCD screen I would seriously consider buying it.
Price is good too. What more do you expect for $170. This phone can easily compete with $500 phones from Apple or Samsung and the rest of the luxury brands for less than half the price.
- ?
- Anonymous
- xjH
- 16 hours ago
Bro, 2MP depth sensor lives on. 🫡
- P
- Pushkar
- CbJ
- 17 hours ago
I wonder why brands are not providing UFS 3.1 under 15000 INR. They are either offering ufs 2.2 or 4.0 (above 25k).