Another set of Pixel 7 and 7 Pro renders arrive alongside manual

It's three days to Google's Pixel 7 event so let's enjoy some quality press renders of the Pixel 7, Pixel 7 Pro, as well as the control scheme taken straight out of the manual for the two phones and the Pixel Watch.
Here's the Google Pixel 7 Pro in Obsidian, Hazel, and Snow.
Google Pixel 7 Pro, source: Evan Blass
And this is the Google Pixel 7 in Obsidian, Snow, and Lemongrass. Interestingly, the widgets on the homescreen show the October 4 date, perhaps that was the original event date? Just spitballing here.
Google Pixel 7, source: Evan Blass
Moving on to the 'Your device' section of the Pixel phones and watch's Quick Start Guide (User Manual), which details the location of the various controls - power/lock button, volume buttons, SIM tray (which is mistakenly listed as having a microSD card add-on). The guide confirms that the Pixel 7 will have an 8MP front camera and a duo of 50MP wide camera, and 12MP ultrawide camera on the back.
For the Pixel 7 Pro, the selfie resolution is also listed as 8MP, although it should be a wider 11MP camera, while on the back, the main wide camera is called a 50MP 'octa' camera, and the periscope zoom isn't mentioned by name at all.
The Pixel Watch will have a wide button, a rotating crown, as well as a microphone and speaker.
Manual screenshots, source: Evan Blass
Images courtesy of Evan Blass.
Related
Reader comments
- Anonymous
- 04 Oct 2022
- nFF
As much as I agree that the trade off is perhaps not a good one; I will say that the change from f3.5 is very unlikely to result in any noticeable diffraction.
- Anonymous
- 04 Oct 2022
- t7q
Android: We are first in everything, unlike that fruit brand! Google: That dynamic island thingamajig looks cool. Let's put thatt on the back of our flagship Android phones.
- Anonymous
- 04 Oct 2022
- n@7
"but the advantage regarding reach might be even smaller than 10%" If the f-number is really 40% higher, but the focal length is just 10% higher, then I even wouldn't exclude that you could maybe(!) get a slightly worse angular resol...