Samsung unveils Galaxy S Plus, ticks at 1.4GHz
- R
- RMP
- mTH
- 14 Apr 2011
No flash again!!!! what is the use?
- A
- Android Killer
- RNW
- 14 Apr 2011
...so in june we can expect 1.6ghz
in july 1.8ghz
in august 2ghz
...correct me if im wrong...
- l
- lik
- ib1
- 14 Apr 2011
i think ,Lg Optimus 2x much better compare samung galaxy s plus..
- ?
- Anonymous
- Y7T
- 14 Apr 2011
Faster CPU but much slower GPU? Don't want.
- ?
- Anonymous
- mhB
- 14 Apr 2011
I thought Samsung did their own CPUs.
And why leave out the led?
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0de
- 14 Apr 2011
Why would anyone buy this when the Galaxy S II is coming out at around the same time or very soon after?
- D
- AnonD-267
- Mbt
- 14 Apr 2011
OMG.. Smartphones started to overcome netbook performance...
- p
- pit
- 0Tt
- 14 Apr 2011
Oh come on don't stay with 4'inc screen give us something bigger let's say around to 4.5'inc please begging you..
- A
- Andresoid
- m9s
- 14 Apr 2011
So, Samsung launches yet another phone... it's quite annoying, in fact. But the real concern is prices. How come this one is more expensive than an iPad?!??!
- D
- AnonD-491
- 2@e
- 14 Apr 2011
Soon, my computer's 3.6 Ghz quad core processor will feel outdated by these cell phones.
- D
- AnonD-40
- IDk
- 14 Apr 2011
Just get the I9000 and overclock it to 1.4 GHz. You'll have all the features of Galaxy S Plus and a better GPU.
- D
- Denzo
- vCA
- 13 Apr 2011
Awesome! I am stuck.. Arc, SG2, or wait i5.. bruaaaa
- D
- AnonD-5395
- mTn
- 13 Apr 2011
I was interested until I saw the compare tool. Any reason why someone would not get an SG2 instead. Will get cheaper though, must be if they want to sell.
- a
- aa
- 0Fu
- 13 Apr 2011
What does'nt Have Built in Toaster, That Sucks.
- h
- hate trolls
- 3iR
- 13 Apr 2011
most phones look like this now so stop beeing an i-fanboy.
- m
- mate
- MCr
- 13 Apr 2011
not worth the money, just because it has 400 mhz more and a metallic cover.
- D
- AnonD-1544
- 9xd
- 13 Apr 2011
No flash again!! Ohh my god this can't be true loool.
Samsung just keeps providing me with reasons to make a laugh out of them.
- N
- Niram
- MK8
- 13 Apr 2011
They should have left the same cpu/gpu compination as the original SGS...no point in slightly upgrading the cpu and massively degrading it's gpu. Seems like Samsung is making awkward decisions with gpu's in their devices this year (Mali400 in SGS2 still has questionable performance).
- D
- AnonD-4254
- 7tD
- 13 Apr 2011
Galaxy S 2011? This naming strategy is good. Even in automobiles, sportsbikes change technically every 2 years, like Honda CBR, Kawasaki Ninja, etc. but they retain the same name, so that PAST ADVERTISING's BENEFITS REMAIN!
If Nokia could have retained old names, like using the name "N73 2009 model" rather than "N79", then the past advertising could have added up to value, creating legends out of those mobiles!
And they would not run out of model names.
- L
- Laurynas
- 0xM
- 13 Apr 2011
Nice update! :)
I have searched some info about a "Super AMOLED" and its "Burn-In" effect and seams that about 35% of "Super AMOLED" users are telling that their screens are affected by Burn-In effect. And that is pretty sad!
So, it would be useful to know more official news about "Super AMOLED Plus" lifetime and "Burn-In" effect, I think it may be a big disadvantage! :(
What do you think about that?