Samsung found to infringe on yet another Apple patent

22 January, 2014
Things aren't looking up for Samsung as a California judge has awarded a summary judgment in favor of Apple.

Sort by:

  • M
  • Moose
  • DtL
  • 22 Jan 2014

Since apple obvisously needs more money along with the mountain they make charging folk for their products and taking from samsung, once they ripped everyone off and have more money than anyone, they can fund the world then so that there is no starving people no one unemplyed, no coutries in debt. WELL DONE APPLE, i will like you only then

    • ?
    • Anonymous
    • 4QS
    • 22 Jan 2014

    Really??? When Samsung gets a victory it is tossed...But Apple can win the most ridiculous ones....And if Samsung has a patent it immediately means it's only to use against Apple.....So even though they hold the patent and it's valid....It now does not count....AND WHAT ON EARTH DO THEY THINK APPLE BUYS AND STEALS ALL THEIR PATENTS FOR??????? To use against people....But that is for sure and ok.....Seems the Uk court is the only one that ever treated Samsung with any fairness...

    Despite apple using copied and stolen ideas with nearly everything. Even the names Iphone and Ipad were stolen. The Iphone design was stolen. Ipad heavily inspired. They buy and copy all parts and architectures. They use photo shopped evidence. They lie and try and sue everyone. But....They do no wrong. Their scheme to sue Samsung for more money then they pay for Samsung parts made their intentions of wanting profit off free parts more than obvious....Yet people continually let this go on....

    Apple is even in the process of getting possible approval for a patent for their store set up. Glass and table placement and what not....Seriously?????????
    It's all about the name and money in the end....What a sad pathetic world we live in.

      • S
      • Striker
      • 0EV
      • 22 Jan 2014

      The truth i simple: When you steal and profit from it - finally you pay 10 times the profit. Especially if your name is Samsung:)))

        • ?
        • Anonymous
        • mqq
        • 22 Jan 2014

        This whole trail is a fix as the Judge used to work for Apple as there Patent officer and it being within miles of Apple HQ

          • m
          • mikens
          • 22 Jan 2014

          Judge Lucy Koh paid well by Apple... b*tch...

            • ?
            • Anonymous
            • 4QS
            • 22 Jan 2014

            Anonymous, 22 Jan 2014I though apple and Samsung were going talk this out like gr... moreWith apple that is not possible

              • ?
              • Anonymous
              • ixu
              • 22 Jan 2014

              I though apple and Samsung were going talk this out like grown ups not kids

                6 of 6