Ericsson R520m
MORE PICTURES

Ericsson R520m

User opinions and reviews

Sort by:

  • S
  • SP
  • 04 Dec 2001

This is an excellent phone that incorporates Bluetooth/GPRS/Triband/WAP and speaker phone functionality. It also allows you to do picture messaging and maintains a very generous standby and talk time.

Great phone but limited marketability. If this ever comes to your region, do not think twice, grab it before you regret. So much more value for money than the Nokia 6210. Very stable platform and does not require frequent s/w upgrades unlike Nokias'. Viva Ericsson!

    • n
    • notz
    • 03 Dec 2001

    Is this series avaliable in Indonesia?

      • e
      • european
      • 15 Nov 2001

      I'm sorry, but no1 of Ericssons new, more advanced gsm-phones, will be released in america 4 a long time, maybe q3-4 next year, I no it's unfair. But look at japan, they allready got 3G and almost all of their phones got full-colour display, they support java, so that's unfair to europe.

        • S
        • Snoopy
        • 14 Oct 2001

        Its a great phone, but mine it's has been stolen, so if u are a rich men and if u wanna help me to get a new one , write me.

          • J
          • Jason
          • 11 Oct 2001

          This is a great phone. After owning a series of Nokia (latest being 6210) I'm glad I made the transition. Nice big display, feature rich (Bluetooth, WAP, GPRS, etc.), and the magnesium back is actually reassuring to me. I don't find it "ugly" because to me it means solid quality construction.

            • M
            • Mark LV
            • 18 Jul 2001

            Ian, I confirm that you ARE stupid and you should buy the phone!!

              • F
              • FT
              • 25 Jun 2001

              I went out to buy this phone at the weekend only to be stopped in my tracks when I saw the rear of the phone. I was so disappointed, this phone has so many features it just begs to be bought however it looks like Ericsson didn't have time to finish the rear. It looks tacky and the black battery sat in the middle looks terrible, I'm sure it's meant to contrast but it doesn't. Someone please tell me I'm being stupid and should still buy it!! Anyone else think the rear looks unfinished?

                • S
                • Safari Surf
                • 04 Jun 2001

                This is my fifth ericsson phone (T18,T20,R320,R380) and it seems to get better and better- The R520 is definitely a step in the right direction.

                  • l
                  • larry
                  • 01 Jun 2001

                  is the r520m available in america yet? will it support the voicestream sim card
                  thanks

                    • A
                    • Antoine Khater
                    • 07 May 2001

                    I also forgot to mention that the sync program that ships with the R520m to synchronise with outlook is NOT working, and is not yet available for d/l on any website.

                      • A
                      • Antoine Khater
                      • 07 May 2001

                      I have this phone for 1 month now, I HATE his look (I hate ericsson, I am a nokia man- i bought it for gprs) its features are fine but his software is not user friendly at all (mowhere near Nokia) battery lifetime is fair provided you dont use IR, i recharge my phone every night if I use IR for one hour (dont beleive what they say about the battery) if you dont need GPRS go for Nokia 6210 or even 9210.

                        • a
                        • akmis
                        • 13 Apr 2001

                        From far, looks like watermelon with seeds.

                          • G
                          • Genius
                          • 13 Mar 2001

                          When is it comming out, and what would the price be. I love it

                            • K
                            • Kamaludin
                            • 21 Dec 2000

                            Very excited and very good features.

                              • ?
                              • Anonymous
                              • 10 Dec 2000

                              how much is r380?