Google Pixel 2 XL
- m
- marko97sx
- 05Z
- 08 Mar 2018
This phone is embarrassing. Look at those bezels. Yes, they're smaller, but man, the Xperia XA2 Ultra has the same screen to body ratio and still looks prettier than this phone. The advantage of Nexus phones were that they were cheaper. This is $900. What? Big side bezels, no IP68, just 67, an 'all aluminium design' when it's clearly a plastic coating, a thick one mind you. NO HEADPHONES INCLUDED WITH A $900 SMARTPHONE! No SD card slot, no wireless charging. The Pixel is the last flagship of 2017 and still lacks features, and COSTS $900! I wish that Google wakes up and realize where they actually f*cked up and revive the Nexus line. Way too expensive, I wouldn't recommend this phone to almost anyone. I don't care what MKBHD and others say. The price is not justifiable.
- A
- Apeiron
- nxf
- 06 Mar 2018
This phone was so close to being perfect. Why oh why didn't Google use Samsung for the 2XL screen instead of LG?
- D
- AnonD-680347
- 7te
- 06 Mar 2018
AnonD-569198, 22 Feb 2018Note 8Pixel XL 2. The battery on the note 8 is pretty disappointing to be honest. If you say the pixel xl 2 has poor screen I'd say go with the mate 10 pro
- D
- AnonD-680347
- 7te
- 06 Mar 2018
Flowerberry, 05 Mar 2018Iam thinking to switch to the Pixel 2 XL from my Galaxy Not... moreAny specific reason you are leaving the note 8
- F
- Flowerberry
- 0Tc
- 05 Mar 2018
Iam thinking to switch to the Pixel 2 XL from my Galaxy Note 8 or maybe wait until Pixel 3 arrives? hmmm
- A
- Apeiron
- m5H
- 01 Mar 2018
AnonD-457393, 01 Mar 2018Ok thank you. Are the pixel 2 xls screen problems that much... moreThe screen quality really isn’t acceptable for a flagship in this price-range. All of them have some degree of blue shift but some are a lot worse than others. There’s also graininess and black smearing. This is because Google used LG for the 2XL screen, while the regular model uses a Samsung screen without these issues.
- D
- AnonD-457393
- mXD
- 01 Mar 2018
Apeiron, 01 Mar 2018I’m going back to the 2XL. I love the panda model and clean... moreOk thank you. Are the pixel 2 xls screen problems that much of an issue and I have Bluetooth headphones so I’m not that fussed about no headphone jack
- A
- Apeiron
- m5H
- 01 Mar 2018
AnonD-457393, 01 Mar 2018This or s8+. I use my phone for YouTube, snapchat, listenin... moreI’m going back to the 2XL. I love the panda model and clean Android UI. Plus it has the best camera in the business. However, the S8 is objectively better all round. It doesn’t have the 2XL’s screen issues and has that 3.5mm jack.
- D
- AnonD-457393
- mXD
- 01 Mar 2018
This or s8+. I use my phone for YouTube, snapchat, listening to music, instagram, Facebook, games, web browsing and taking photos
- B
- Brad
- mXD
- 01 Mar 2018
Pixel 2 xl or Galaxy s8+. I’m not sure as one phone strength is the others weakness, I’m struggling to decide which one is best. I use my phone a lot for YouTube, web browsing, listening to music (through speakers and Bluetooth headphones) and snapchat and take a fair amount of photos
- L
- LIRKER
- PS6
- 01 Mar 2018
AnonD-448088, 28 Feb 2018Snapdragon 835 can't shoot 4K at 60 fps. It's a hardware li... moreIf Snapdragon 835 available to have 4K display with 60fps rate, it is possible to record 4K 60fps.
- D
- AnonD-448088
- tTZ
- 28 Feb 2018
Snapdragon 835 can't shoot 4K at 60 fps. It's a hardware limitation
- ?
- Anonymous
- AeE
- 26 Feb 2018
Will it ever shoot 4k at 60 fps? Is there a hardware limitation or is the software not suited/allowing 60fps
- L
- LIRKER
- KZK
- 24 Feb 2018
Anonymous, 22 Feb 2018The main feature of Android is that it is So Open and Cust... moreIf the hardware is not a prominent reason to drives a device then why we have Snapdragon 835 instead of having Snapdragon 200 for the entire life?
- c
- charger
- KgZ
- 22 Feb 2018
Rei, 30 Jan 2018Pixel 2 XL or Note 8?Note 8
- D
- AnonD-569198
- YdS
- 22 Feb 2018
Rei, 30 Jan 2018Pixel 2 XL or Note 8?Note 8
- D
- AnonD-569198
- YdS
- 22 Feb 2018
Anonymous, 18 Feb 2018Idea for Pixel 3 (let me know if you guys agree. Never know... moreTL;DR
- ?
- Anonymous
- rAT
- 22 Feb 2018
The main feature of Android is that it is So Open
and Customizable. To whom? The basic
customization of choosing between Stock Android
and manufacturer based UI by the ultimate
consumer is even not on the books of Android
Licensing agreements. We may think of launchers.
When the ULTIMATE UI that comes with the phone is a bloatware by itself, what
to do with launchers. To my belief every Android
mobile should be released with stock Android. It
should be the wish of the consumer to choose
between launchers. Many get washed away by the
different hardware specs but, the basics lie in the software that drives up the device. Good
Luck Google.
- A
- Anonymous
- B45
- 18 Feb 2018
Idea for Pixel 3 (let me know if you guys agree. Never know if Google is watching):
Pixel 3 mini: $400
Display: 5.0" 1080 x 2160 Super AMOLED full HD; Gorilla Glass 4 protection
Aluminum Body
RAM: 4 GB
Hard Drive: 64GB/128GB ($100 more for the 128GB)
Stereo Speakers (subwoofer on the bottom of the phone)
Home Button/Fingerprint Sensor in front
Battery: 3,000 mAH removable battery (to compensate the sensor in the front)
SD slot? Hybrid Dual SIM (up to 256GB for the MicroSD) with eSIM embedded
Rear Camera: 12 MP (same as the Pixel 2) with 1080p/60fps video capture
Front Camera: 8 MP with 1080p video capture
IP53 Splashproof
Headphone Jack with DAC
Android Oreo 8.1
Pixel 3: $600
Display: 5.5" 1440 x 2560 pixels; P-OLED; Gorilla Glass 5 protection
Half Aluminum/Half Glass
RAM: 4GB/6GB ($100 more to upgrade)
Hard Drive: 64GB/128GB/256GB ($75 more per Hard Drive upgrade; $150 max)
Front-Firing Stereo Speakers (Dolby Atmos or Harmon/Kardon)
Fingerprint Sensor in the back
Battery: 3,500 mAH Battery; embedded
SD slot?: Hybrid dual SIM (up to 256GB for the MicroSD) with embedded eSIM
Rear camera: Dual setup with 16 MP and 12 MP Wide-angle Lens; 4K/30fps recording
Front camera: 8 MP
IP67 Waterproof/Dustproof
Headphone Jack with DAC
IR Blaster
Android Oreo 8.1
Pixel 3 XL: $750
Display: 6.2" 1440 x 2880 pixels P-OLED; Gorilla Glass 5
Half Aluminum/Half Glass (enabling Wireless Charging)
Variants: 4GB RAM/64GB ROM; 4GB/256GB ($150 more); 6GB/128GB ($125 more form the base price); 6GB/256GB ($200 more from the base price), 8GB/256GB ($300 more from base price)
Front-Firing Stereo Speakers (Dolby Atmos or Harmon/Kardon)
Fingerprint sensor in the back.
Battery: 4,000 mAH Battery; embedded
SD slot? Yes; dedicated slot (up to 1TB) with dual SIM and embedded eSIM
Rear camera: Dual setup 16MP + 12MP Wide-angle lens; 4K/60fps recording
Front camera: Dual setup 12MP + 12MP Wide-angle lens; 1080p/60fps recording
IP68 Waterproof/Dustproof
Headphone Jack with DAC and FM radio
IR Blaster
Android Oreo 8.1
They can all come with the quick charge cable and brick, pre-applied tempered glass screen protector, and wired headset made by H/K or Google.
What do you guys think?
- L
- LIRKER
- PS6
- 16 Feb 2018
Devil, 16 Feb 2018Nice design but lacking many features for high price. No wi... moreWhich make this phone such a loser. Even though I owned this one, it's not worth the money. It's undeniable that Pixels camera had no match, but it's not much different with other brands such as Mate 10 Pro, Galaxy Note8, iPhone X and others. They ripped off headphone jack, microSD card slot and no double camera was a terrible idea for 900 bucks phone.