HTC Butterfly S review: Evolution complete
Evolution complete
Synthetic benchmarks
The HTC Butterfly S uses the Snapdragon 600 chipset which continues to grow in popularity, even though the Snadragon 800 is about to go mass market.
The Qualcomm APQ8064T SoC with Adreno 320 GPU is the same combo as the one found on the HTC One, except the quad-core Krait 300 CPU is clocked at 1.9GHz, compared to the 1.7GHz in the One. There's 2GB of RAM, same as on the HTC One, so overall we're expecting slightly higher, numbers here.
The 1.9GHz clock speed of the Butterfly S's processor is amongst the highest around, and the results of the single-thread CPU test Benchmark Pi and the multi-thread Linpack and Geekbench 2 have the Galaxy S4 versions as its only real competitor.
Benchmark Pi
Lower is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S4 Active
130 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
132 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
132 -
HTC Butterfly S
135 -
LG Optimus G Pro
147 -
HTC One
151 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 mini
166 -
Sony Xperia Z
264 -
HTC Butterfly
266 -
Oppo Find 5
267 -
HTC One X+
280 -
LG Optimus G
285 -
HTC One mini
293 -
Samsung Galaxy Note II
305 -
HTC One X (Tegra 3)
330 -
LG Optimus 4X HD
350 -
Samsung Galaxy S III
359 -
Nexus 4
431
Linpack
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S4 Active
818 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
791 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
788 -
LG Optimus G Pro
743 -
HTC Butterfly S
669 -
HTC One
646 -
Sony Xperia Z
630 -
HTC Butterfly
624 -
LG Optimus G
608 -
Oppo Find 5
593 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 mini
413 -
HTC One mini
320 -
Samsung Galaxy Note II
214.3 -
Nexus 4
213.5 -
HTC One X+
177.7 -
Samsung Galaxy S III
175.5 -
HTC One X
160.9 -
LG Optimus 4X HD
141.5
Geekbench 2
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
3324 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
3227 -
HTC Butterfly S
3170 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 Active
3046 -
LG Optimus G Pro
3040 -
HTC One
2708 -
Sony Xperia Z
2173 -
HTC Butterfly
2143 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 mini
1937 -
Samsung Galaxy S III
1845 -
LG Optimus G
1723 -
LG Optimus 4X HD
1661 -
iPhone 5
1601 -
HTC One mini
1417
Quadrant and AnTuTu factor in overall device performance instead of just the CPU, and the Butterfly S shines again.
AnTuTu
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
26275 -
HTC Butterfly S
25357 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
24716 -
HTC One
22678 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 Active
21363 -
Sony Xperia Z
20794 -
LG Optimus G Pro
20056 -
HTC Butterfly
19513 -
Samsung Galaxy S III
15547 -
Oppo Find 5
15167 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 mini
14518 -
HTC One mini
11434
Quadrant
Higher is better
-
HTC Butterfly S
13130 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
12446 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
12376 -
LG Optimus G Pro
12105 -
HTC One
11746 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 Active
11346 -
Sony Xperia Z
8075 -
HTC One X+
7632 -
LG Optimus G
7439 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 mini
7153 -
Oppo Find 5
7111 -
HTC One mini
6048 -
HTC One X
5952 -
Samsung Galaxy Note II
5916 -
Samsung Galaxy S III
5450 -
Nexus 4
4567
We run both of the GLBenchmark tests in offscreen mode, testing raw CPU power. Here the Buttefly S was behind the Galaxy S4 Octa, but just barely.
GLBenchmark 2.5 Egypt (1080p off-screen)
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
43 -
HTC Butterfly S
42 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
41 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 Active
41 -
HTC One
37 -
Oppo Find 5
32 -
Google Nexus 4
32 -
Sony Xperia Z
31 -
Sony Xperia ZL
31 -
Sony Xperia SP
31 -
Apple iPhone 5
30 -
LG Optimus G Pro
30 -
LG Optimus G
21 -
Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3
17 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 mini
17 -
Samsung Galaxy Note II
17 -
HTC One mini
15 -
HTC One X
11
GLBenchmark 2.7 T-Rex (1080p off-screen)
Higher is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
17.1 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
17.1 -
Apple iPad 4
16.8 -
HTC Butterfly S
16 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 Active
16 -
Google Nexus 10
13.9 -
LG Optimus G
13.9 -
Sony Xperia Z
13.5 -
Sony Xperia Tablet Z
13 -
Sony Xperia ZL
12.8 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 mini
6.4 -
Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3
6.3 -
HTC One mini
5.6 -
Samsung Galaxy Note II
4.9
By the way, the Adreno 320 GPU on the Butterfly S supports OpenGL ES 3.0, which was recently added to Android (with 4.3) and that promised improved graphics. It's reasonable to expect even better graphics performance once Android 4.3 makes its way to this device.
The JavaScript performance of the HTC Butterfly S browser is close enough to that of the HTC One, but that extra bit of processing power helps push it past the other HTC flagship. In Vellamo we encountered our highest benchmark score to date, reflecting unparalleled browsing performance from the Butterfly S.
SunSpider
Lower is better
-
Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
804 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
810 -
Samsung Ativ S
891 -
Apple iPhone 5
915 -
Nokia Lumia 920
910 -
Samsung Galaxy Note II
972 -
HTC One X+
1001 -
LG Optimus G Pro
1011 -
HTC Butterfly S
1046 -
Motorola RAZR i XT890
1059 -
HTC One
1124 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 mini
1185 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 Active
1196 -
Samsung Galaxy S III
1192 -
HTC One mini
1237 -
Sony Xperia Z
1336 -
LG Optimus G
1353 -
HTC Butterfly
1433 -
Nexus 4
1971 -
Oppo Find 5
2045
BrowserMark 2
Higher is better
-
LG Optimus G
2555 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
2438 -
HTC Butterfly S
2378 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 Active
2338 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 mini
2314 -
HTC One
2262 -
Sony Xperia Tablet Z
2170 -
HTC One mini
2164 -
Sony Xperia ZL
2107 -
Sony Xperia Z
2093 -
LG Optimus G Pro
1801 -
Oppo Find 5
1797 -
Nexus 4
1794 -
Nokia Lumia 920
1774 -
Google Nexus 10
1773 -
HTC Butterfly
1475 -
Samsung Galaxy S III
1247
Vellamo
Higher is better
-
HTC Butterfly S
2592 -
Samsung Galaxy Note II
2418 -
HTC One
2382 -
HTC One mini
2252 -
Sony Xperia Z
2189 -
HTC One X (Tegra 3)
2078 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600)
2060 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa)
2056 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 mini
2019 -
Samsung Galaxy S4 Active
1936 -
HTC Butterfly
1866 -
Oppo Find 5
1658 -
Samsung Galaxy S III
1641 -
LG Optimus 4X HD
1568 -
LG Optimus G
1522 -
Nexus 4
1310
Overall, the HTC Butterfly S is about as good as it gets in terms of processing power. The device is neck-and-neck with the Samsung Galaxy S4 versions in most tests, meaning that it has nothing to worry about in terms of both speed and future-proofing.
Reader comments
- Iejaz
- 01 Sep 2016
- uZa
wi fi password
- AnonD-112678
- 14 Dec 2015
- qba
The audio quality review is misleading as it does not test output voltage. When I first bought this phone I noticed a nasty bass distortion when I was listening to "Touch" by Daft Punk at volumes above 11/15. Since Android 4.3 it's fine at 12/15 but ...
- NameNick
- 04 Feb 2014
- nxk
I've had this phone for a month now and it's not bad. Battery life is above average, display's quite nice and it does everything well (I haven't bothered with the camera - I have a Nokia 808 for that). But as a phone ? It IS a bit too big - not lea...