Users file lawsuits against Apple for slowing down old iPhones

Yordan, 27 December 2017

Apple confirmed it slowed down old devices to keep the battery life, but the silent way the company pushed the feature angered many people. According to Reuters, at least eight owners filed lawsuits in US District Courts in California, New York, and Illinois and a similar one was deposited in an Israeli court.

Users file lawsuits against Apple for slowing down old iPhones Apple iPhone 6s

Slowing down iPhones on purpose was widely accepted as a bad move, but Apple said it had to implement the feature to keep the phones from shutting down abruptly.

A case, filed on Thursday in San Francisco said that “the batteries inability to handle the demand created by processor speeds” was a defect. It also stated that the company should treat the issue as a defect and not mask it like a feature.

Rory Van Loo, a Boston University professor, told Reuters that a case for misrepresentation or fraud might be filed since Apple decided to hide the information that a battery switch can be a better solution to getting a better user experience than buying a new iPhone.

Another law specialist commented that the United States lacks consumer protection norms and Apple might get away with it. In the case of the current lawsuits, some plaintiffs might get reimbursement. Other seek court orders to stop Apple from throttling the CPU speeds in future iDevices.

Via


Related

Reader comments

  • Moj
  • 07 Jan 2018
  • a30

well your point is not really fit here! cause when you buy car it has let's say about 190mph and for example company say there is an update to ECU of car and after updating you find out your car can go up to 170 because of what? protection of engin...

  • moj
  • 07 Jan 2018
  • a30

i think it is you who couldn't afford it and hardly trying to say others can't! other point i must say is that there are much much more expensive phones than apple iphones like BlackBerry Porsche Design series or the vertue things! so continue to...

  • Anonymous
  • 07 Jan 2018
  • I8m

False again. You made your own meaning fo what they saud and only took a portion of what they said and passed it off as basically being the only or main part of what they said. So yet again false and nice try.

Popular articles

More

Popular devices

Electric Vehicles

More