Motorola C975
- ?
- Anonymous
- 27 Dec 2004
fone suckks
- s
- sophie
- 27 Dec 2004
got got this phone and its ace i bought it out of my own money so i wasnt that dear lol
its wicked
- a
- awadh
- 26 Dec 2004
i love this phone is the best but it shud be in stock in shops plz
- ?
- Anonymous
- 26 Dec 2004
Phone is absolutely BOLLOCKS.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 24 Dec 2004
Not happy with the phone. Thought more from Motorola. If you desperately want a motorola, then go for v600, it is typical motorola (good), but the c975 is totally more complex and weaker in featues!
- ?
- Anonymous
- 24 Dec 2004
I ahv this phone and 7250i, and the noki is better despite having not as many features as the moto. This is because the screen resolution, the size, weight and gprs modem of the phones. Motorola cannot compete with nokia on any basis
- ?
- Anonymous
- 24 Dec 2004
Cannot believe the low profile of this phone. GPRS IS SLOE, AND VGA CAMERA IS VERY WEAK. Also the resloution sucks, and the delicacy of the phone, its like handling an egg. Had it for 2 days, got it cheap so thinking over taking it back.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 23 Dec 2004
'Fraid Not for cheap. It will cost you round £200 now because CPW stopped doin the deal. The Nokai 7600 is a very good handset (I got it on contract) - i am with all the reviews here, the motorola c975 is motorolas worst handset yet. Guess the price of the phone was really too good to be true!!!
- J
- Jameson
- 23 Dec 2004
My son got it for me, and I am not at all happy with it, i've asked him to exchange it for the nec616v. I hear that is a decent phone. I really dont like the navigation or the feature quality 0on this Motorola, can I still get the Nokai 7600
- ?
- Anonymous
- 23 Dec 2004
Cannot believe the features on this phone are sooooooo baaad. The way they appear on websites under 'specification' is so fooling. When you try the phone, then you see what a wreck it is. Motorolas worst handset by far.
- J
- Johan
- 23 Dec 2004
Phones price fooled me, I sohould not have bought it. My advice, dont be fooled!! Go for a NOKIA or SONY ERRICSEN. Features are whack and size is humongous
- ?
- Anonymous
- 23 Dec 2004
Very Heavy, and big, feature wise, I was fooled. The phones features are not very good, the wap is slow loading and how can a phone be made qwithout Bluetooth
- m
- michelle
- 23 Dec 2004
i have just got this mobile and i have had to take it back because it is constantly coming up with no signal. the phone features are amazing and i do recomend this phone! i am hoping that the signal problem isnt to do with the make of the phone and i am hoping it was just a one-off. I am exchanging it for a new one! i got it from woolworths for £44.99 with £15 airtime included in it! I got this phone on 3 network and its pay as you go. The only bad thing that i would say about this phone is that when you go on pay as you go your credit expires after 30 days so you have to top it up every 30 days. The least amount of money on a top up voucher is £15 so if you do not use all of this you will loose out on money! over all i give this phone 8/10
- ?
- Anonymous
- 22 Dec 2004
Defiently the Nokai 7600 is much better in all its features. PS. Try loading the GPRS WAP on the motorola, it takes soooooooo looooong. Very dissapointed with the Motorola
- ?
- Anonymous
- 22 Dec 2004
I was told by the store clerk that this and the Nokia 7600 are the best phones at the moment. I purchased the Motorola because they were not selling the Nokia 7600. I am returning it. The Navigation is all wrong. Te Phone weighs a ton. The phone also is not loud and the scree resolution absolutely SUCKS. I've have not tried a Nkai 7600 yet. Is it any Good?
- ?
- Anonymous
- 22 Dec 2004
I'm bored of it now. And I've only had it for 2a week. I think the camera is OK, BUT EVERYTHING ELE SUCKS. Firstly My PC wont pick up the phone. The VGA IS SO SHITE!! The mp3 player is not even loud and the weight, its like I am at the Gym.
- G
- GG
- 22 Dec 2004
My sister purchased this phone. I personally think it Reaks, the sound quality it very weak, it has not got changeable faces, I've read that the Camera lens is easily damaged, and all round, my sister dislikes the phone aswell. Take my Advice, Sony Erriccsenmn t610 is muchj better. OK So all the features is not there but Sony has the BLUETOOTH TECHNOLOGY. Motorola Does not. How can you manufacture a phone these days, without BLUETOOTH. IT IS WHACK!!!
- T
- TOP
- 22 Dec 2004
I cant believe how crap this phone is. I've had it for a month now and also purchased a Nokia. Comparing the two, motorola have the same features (some less)but Nokia's features are much better, A LOT BETTER, I a changing my Contract Handset ASAP!!!!
- X
- XSO
- 21 Dec 2004
Holy crap, what is this, the Anti-Motorola Squad or something?
- ?
- Anonymous
- 21 Dec 2004
This fone weighs a TONNE, does not look like a modern phone, and battery life SUCKS