Motorola Edge 50 Pro
- NeonHD
- 6Fi
- 04 Apr 2024
ThatOneWeabo, 03 Apr 2024decent midranger don't see much on why people are comp... moreIt is very decent but it has an Achilles heel (UFS 2.2).
To me I don't think it would have a significant impact on my usage, so I would still consider this phone; the gorgeous build and other decent specs makes up for it. But yeah UFS 2.2 is very unacceptable.
- G
- Gaia
- Y7W
- 04 Apr 2024
CamoGeko-XDA, 04 Apr 2024Poco X6 Pro that costs only a little bit more has UF4.0, 51... moredownsides are cameras, IP68, building materials, wireless charging, NFC (only available in some markets), video output, usb 2.0, and probably worse speakers.
- CamoGeko-XDA
- yat
- 04 Apr 2024
DarlingYext, 03 Apr 2024At this price UFS 2.2 is absolutely unacceptable, when phon... morePoco X6 Pro that costs only a little bit more has UF4.0, 512GB of storage, more RAM and a way faster processor. Downsides are the cameras and no full IP68 rating.
- CamoGeko-XDA
- yat
- 04 Apr 2024
How is this a pro model??
Only 4500mah battery and only UFS2.2, like what??
Worlds 1st AI camera?
- ?
- Anonymous
- sSx
- 04 Apr 2024
I better wait and buy one plus ace 3v.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 8Kf
- 04 Apr 2024
2 out of 3 rear cameras downgraded
- A
- Anton .el PAPI.
- 8xr
- 04 Apr 2024
JokerMNE, 04 Apr 2024Smart busines, they create cheap phone who has good and pre... moreThey only messed it up with the storage, otherwise it's a decent phone, I hope the ultra doesn't turn out to be 3.1 because Motorola would screw it
- J
- JokerMNE
- ixj
- 04 Apr 2024
Smart busines, they create cheap phone who has good and premium looking, and awearge consumer who dosent know much about technology (70% of users) will see in store this phone and will say "Look at this nice looking phone, what is the price of this phone"
Afther that game is over, they will buy phone for sure.
- N
- Nitz
- 7t}
- 03 Apr 2024
Deal-breaker: UFS 2.2. Everything else is either too good for the price segment or pardonable.
Where it really has an 'Edge': Complete IP68 protection (which even Oneplus 12 having more than double the price lacks) ; USB 3.1 (which Vivo X100 at more than double the price doesn't have) ; Display Port (rarely seen, that too in some flagships) ; 125W wired charging with adaptor + 50W wireless + 10W reverse wireless charging (no match there) ; Camera incorporating all bells and whistles and no gimmicks - Main, Ultrawide, Macro and telephoto(3x zoom) capabilities, OIS in two cameras, autofocus in all three of them
Where it's passable/pardonable: Maximum storage of 256 GB and not 512 GB ; Mid-range processor - Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (better alternatives could be Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2, 7+ Gen 3, Dimensity 8200, 8300 etc) ; unknown Gorilla Glass version ; base version comes with only 68W adaptor
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0p}
- 03 Apr 2024
Gaia, 03 Apr 2024If the price is below $350, then it will be a decent midran... moreUfs2.2 has speed of storage used by iphones
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0p}
- 03 Apr 2024
Gaia, 03 Apr 2024If the price is below $350, then it will be a decent midran... moreYou want phone like this for $350?
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
That is A35/Nothing 2a price.
Much inferior cam hardware, no IP68, worse screen, weaker SoC
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0p}
- 03 Apr 2024
Should be
Edge Ultra 8g3
Edge 7g3
Neo 7sg2
- R
- Rgs
- DMa
- 03 Apr 2024
Wonder why Moto messed up on the storage, what was it going to lose. Should have included UFS 3.1 and 512GB option.
- L
- Lii2taju4u
- Nug
- 03 Apr 2024
I think I kinda like the phone for it's slick design not to mention it's specifications but missing IR blaster, it's a good budget smart phone
- -
- -
- 64W
- 03 Apr 2024
That Tofu (Moonlight Pearl) color variant looks so weird
- A
- Anton .el PAPI.
- 8xr
- 03 Apr 2024
Diavoros, 03 Apr 2024I don't understand why it is equipped with a SoC that ... moreIn conclusion, buy an iPhone or the s24 ultra and leave yourself one of the many nonsense of these manufacturers that have the general public crazy with so many changes in names, versions and specifications....
- DarlingYext
- 6mM
- 03 Apr 2024
ThatOneWeabo, 03 Apr 2024decent midranger don't see much on why people are comp... moreAt this price UFS 2.2 is absolutely unacceptable, when phones that are half the price, or less use the same storage type, including some of Motorola's own phones, for example the G84. It also doesn't deserve the Pro naming, which makes it seem like a huge downgrade compared to the Edge 40 Pro, I understand that there is a price difference, but it's not a successor of that phone, it can't even really be called a successor of the standard Edge 40, and in some ways it's not even better than the Edge 30 Fusion. I'd say it should've been called Edge 40, and should've had UFS 3.1 storage.
I understand that it's just a name, but it's as if the S25 Ultra were to launch next year with a 7+ Gen 2, or something like that, and kept the awesome cameras, but dropped down the price to around $800, sure it would be cheaper than the S24 Ultra, but it's just wrong. (Would be amazing value though, I guess.)
- ThatOneWeabo
- 6vR
- 03 Apr 2024
decent midranger don't see much on why people are complaining about this phone.
- G
- Gaia
- Y7W
- 03 Apr 2024
If the price is below $350, then it will be a decent midranger. Cameras seem to be good, but its biggest problem is the storage 2.2, which makes no sense. That type of storage should only be used for budget phones below $250
- D
- Diavoros
- PsL
- 03 Apr 2024
I don't understand why it is equipped with a SoC that supports UFS 3.1 storage speed and yet it only has 2.2.