Motorola Moto G (2014) review: Baby steps
Baby steps
Performance
The new Motorola Moto G packs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM 8226 chipset with 1.2GHz quad-core Cortex-A7 CPU. The GPU is Adreno 305, clocked at 450MHz. The device's silicon is the default setup for most mid-range Android smartphone over the past year, and has proven to be a decent performer.
GeekBench and AnTuTu showcase the raw CPU power of a smartphone. The new Moto G did as expected on both occasions.
GeekBench 3
Higher is better
-
HTC One mini 2
1526 -
Xiaomi Redmi 1S
1492 -
Sony Xperia T3
1373 -
Motorola Moto G 4G
1175 -
Motorola Moto G (2014)
1171 -
Sony Xperia M2 Aqua
1106
AnTuTu 5
Higher is better
-
Xiaomi Redmi 1S
19912 -
Sony Xperia M2 Aqua
19016 -
HTC One mini 2
18641 -
Motorola Moto G (2014)
18245
We tried out the anti-cheat version of the popular Basemark OS II benchmark and we found that the Moto G doesn't use any tricks to climb up the score table.
Basemark OS II
Higher is better
-
HTC Desire 820
605 -
Sony Xperia T3
535 -
Motorola Moto G (2014)
526 -
HTC One mini 2
517 -
Motorola Moto G 4G
495 -
Sony Xperia M2 Aqua
452 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note
452 -
Xiaomi Redmi 1S
394
Basemark OS II (single-core)
Higher is better
-
Xiaomi Redmi Note
1701 -
Sony Xperia T3
1465 -
Xiaomi Redmi 1S
1435 -
HTC One mini 2
1304 -
Motorola Moto G 4G
1192 -
Sony Xperia M2 Aqua
1131 -
Motorola Moto G (2014)
1123
Basemark OS II (multi-core)
Higher is better
-
Xiaomi Redmi Note
12771 -
Sony Xperia T3
5759 -
HTC One mini 2
5182 -
Motorola Moto G 4G
5012 -
Motorola Moto G (2014)
5001 -
Sony Xperia M2 Aqua
4887 -
Xiaomi Redmi 1S
4875
Adreno 305 is widespread GPU solution in the segment. The benchmark results of the Moto G are on par with similarly equipped devices.
GFX 2.7 T-Rex (1080p offscreen)
Higher is better
-
Xiaomi Redmi Note
9.8 -
Sony Xperia M2 Aqua
6 -
Sony Xperia T3
5.9 -
HTC One mini 2
5.8 -
Motorola Moto G 4G
5.8 -
Motorola Moto G (2014)
5.8 -
Xiaomi Redmi 1S
5.7
GFX 2.7 T-Rex (onscreen)
Higher is better
-
Sony Xperia M2 Aqua
15.5 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note
13.3 -
Sony Xperia T3
11.2 -
HTC One mini 2
11 -
Motorola Moto G 4G
10.8 -
Motorola Moto G (2014)
10.8 -
Xiaomi Redmi 1S
10.3
BrowserMark 2.1 tests HTML 5 performance, while Mozilla's Kraken 1.1 is JavaScript-centric. The new Moto G did well in both benchmarks when compared to its peers in the segment.
Kraken 1.1
Lower is better
-
Xiaomi Redmi Note
12416 -
Xiaomi Redmi 1S
12470 -
Sony Xperia T3
13738 -
HTC One mini 2
15684 -
Motorola Moto G (2014)
15988 -
Motorola Moto G 4G
16118 -
Sony Xperia M2 Aqua
16129
BrowserMark 2.1
Higher is better
-
Motorola Moto G (2014)
1085 -
Sony Xperia T3
978 -
HTC One mini 2
945 -
Motorola Moto G 4G
911 -
Sony Xperia M2 Aqua
883 -
Xiaomi Redmi Note
588
Overall, the hardware performance of the new Moto G met our expectations. The device is not a powerhouse by any means, but will handle daily tasks without breaking a sweat. The stock Android UI felt fluid and responsive the entire time.
Reader comments
- Anonymous
- 20 Apr 2018
- YTY
Phone super prise lowe
- Anonymous
- 03 Dec 2017
- jK7
Can't get passed the Google login page
- Smiggy
- 16 Oct 2016
- 3HG
Having read your comments I can only assume you had a bad experience. I have had no problems at all with this phone and absolutely love it! I have had no problems with overheating or slowing down and can honestly say it's the best I've ever used and ...