Moto Z duo: hot or not?
- D
- AnonD-546033
- GPd
- 12 Jun 2016
No-Jack(=Hijack), small battery for that screen(Z), ugly scanner-key,that only for scanning(nothing else), huge camera round....no.
- D
- AnonD-546033
- GPd
- 12 Jun 2016
AnonD-174989, 12 Jun 2016The first real innovative products in years! Looking forwar... moreSarcasm?
- h
- huzzy
- fuN
- 12 Jun 2016
Nice inovation/tech
- D
- AnonD-174989
- Knx
- 12 Jun 2016
The first real innovative products in years! Looking forward to see how cameras perform...
- S
- Shazzy B
- 0Fi
- 12 Jun 2016
The lack of a headphone is a complete dealbreaker for me. unless they make a module similar to that JBL one that has a HiFi DAC, speakers and a headphone jack. THEN, and only then, will i ever consider this phone over a Nexus.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0BG
- 12 Jun 2016
So, as always, people don't mind getting screwed. First non-removable and small batteries, now lack of headphones jack.
- N
- No Fan Boy...!
- 7jV
- 12 Jun 2016
Everything is good...except the placement of fingerprint scanner , or rather the design of fingerprint scanner , which looks odd...!
And wish it would had 6GB RAM variant too...!
- A
- Akinaro
- pGV
- 12 Jun 2016
Hot, but voted no just because they fallow ldiotic trend of removing mini-jack connector.
Even with such slim design its possible to keep it(there are thiner devices with it), and saying that its "for better quality of music" is pure lie, I can give you hundreds of devices and headphones that can give you better music quality that all that marketing lies of usb-c audio quality.
And BT headphones? useless with its battery if you use headphones often. and those models that have better quality and protocols for music stream cost the same as phone so its useless to buy it.
Because of ldiotic ideas like that we going back to 2000 where every OEM had its own cables, and we had to carry case filled with cables just to use phones.
BIG NO FOR THAT.