Intel announces new Core X-series processors, features the new Core i9

30 May 2017
Includes nine new models with up to 18 physical cores.

Sort by:

Anonymous, 30 May 2017Agree, Intel for newby only. Gamers, IT, engineers use AMDLol, made me laugh, it is opposite, everybody knows Intel is the best by far :)

    • ?
    • Anonymous
    • t7X
    • 03 Jun 2017

    NICE

      • S
      • Surficial
      • mpr
      • 01 Jun 2017

      Athlon64, 31 May 2017Intel invented x86 but amd made the upgraded x86-64. I don... moreI'm pretty sure amd licences x86 from intel and intel licences x86-64 from amd.

        • A
        • Athlon64
        • Sjt
        • 31 May 2017

        Anonymous, 30 May 2017I think Intel would not want AMD to go out of business. It'... moreIntel invented x86 but amd made the upgraded x86-64.
        I don't remember correct but I think it was a one time license fee that thy paid.

          • D
          • AnonD-632062
          • 3Y1
          • 31 May 2017

          AnonD-523334, 30 May 2017Upto 40TB available. I don't have much knowledge about Wind... moreSeagate had a 60 TB SSD in 2016.

            • S
            • Surficial
            • mpr
            • 31 May 2017

            AnonD-121494, 31 May 2017This is not in response to Ryzen, these are more enthusiast... moreThis seems more of a response to threadripper and the x399 hedt platform than mainstream ryzen.

              • D
              • AnonD-121494
              • Msv
              • 31 May 2017

              This is not in response to Ryzen, these are more enthusiast class processors. I'm pretty sure Intel can and will compete with Ryzen with their 8th gen chips. Highly unlikely they've been twiddling their thumbs while AMD was playing catch up.

                • D
                • AnonD-673504
                • SY$
                • 31 May 2017

                good work AMD, without you we have still just 2 Intel cores for 1000 USD...
                Intel is now unsaleable in mainstream, Intel= lower performance + higher consumption

                  • D
                  • AnonD-117647
                  • Y}}
                  • 31 May 2017

                  Anonymous, 30 May 2017I think Intel would not want AMD to go out of business. It'... moreGood point.....

                    • ?
                    • Anonymous
                    • JG0
                    • 31 May 2017

                    AnonD-209261, 30 May 2017https://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu_list.phpThat's an useless site because it does not list the single core (single thread) performance.

                      • ?
                      • Anonymous
                      • wrm
                      • 31 May 2017

                      *Laughing in 64 PCIe Lanes

                        • A
                        • Android
                        • PU4
                        • 31 May 2017

                        Finnaly I can play tetris again hoooray..

                          • S
                          • Simon
                          • NU0
                          • 31 May 2017

                          Is THIS the response to Ryzen? lmao, I know Intel has been disappointing for so many years now, but this is well below my expectations.

                            • 1
                            • 128^8 - Cores
                            • Sjt
                            • 30 May 2017

                            AnonD-523334, 30 May 2017So the ryzen hardwork gonna in vain. Ryzen wins because of it's value.
                            And as far as the performance is concerned,we will have to wait and see if AMDs threadripper CPUs perform better!

                              • ?
                              • Anonymous
                              • Kg{
                              • 30 May 2017

                              AnonD-117647, 30 May 2017Ah....and yes, they have "Bitten by Ryzen" written on the b... moreI think Intel would not want AMD to go out of business. It's the reason why they even licensed AMD x86 in the first place. So that in case Intel falls apart, there would still be a source for revenue. But I think AMD won't fall apart on it's own since Intel is paying them license fees for the x86-64 architecture. They are having a symbiotic relationahip.

                                • E
                                • EPIC PLATINUM XEON
                                • Sjt
                                • 30 May 2017

                                AnonD-244086, 30 May 2017i7 extreme already existsMost of the people here probably already know that.
                                What he meant is that they should just keep the i7 and i7 Extreme names instead of i9 and i9 Extreme.

                                  aigarslv, 30 May 2017AMD will lose this one, they might be going for investors a... moreAMD hasn't launched their server platform yet. They still need to infiltrate the server market, where revenue is greatest. I'm sure they can win it over with lower core/cost.

                                    • ?
                                    • Anonymous
                                    • f{t
                                    • 30 May 2017

                                    Anonymous, 30 May 2017You won't anything that needs such powerA lot of people do 3D rendering and when it comes to that there is no such thing as over-kill

                                      • ?
                                      • Anonymous
                                      • Fht
                                      • 30 May 2017

                                      Anonymous, 30 May 2017I want a desktop PC with i9 CPU, 256GB ram, 24 or more GB G... moreDude what ???

                                        • D
                                        • AnonD-117647
                                        • 2SL
                                        • 30 May 2017

                                        Ah....and yes, they have "Bitten by Ryzen" written on the box. LOL, I love AMD because they always keep processor prices in check. Imagine how much we would pay for our next laptop or a new processor for our desktop if (God forbid) AMD goes out of business. Intel would sell us even junk at the cost of an arm and a leg. Although, luckily Ryzen is a whole new level of performance but, I have purchased AMDs even in their bad days when possible(casual workloads), just because I wanted them to endure and eventually come up with something competitive. Things look good now, especially when AMD seems to have a definite future plan and is in a better position than it was in the recent past. I wish everyone could get what I am trying to say instead of raving about who's the fastest. No body needs an outright bulldozer of a PC apart from may be a few critical applications. We can all do just fine with a Ryzen or an Intel with just a few frames or seconds here and there even in the most demanding applications. Ultimately its comes down to how much we have to shell out of our wallets and I think with AMD everyone gets the benefit.