Xiaomi Mi Note 3 gets a high score by DxOMark
- ?
- Anonymous
- 8PH
- 09 Dec 2017
ashok, 09 Dec 2017Looks like sony alone is not paying for anything, cant beli... moreSame for LG
- D
- AnonD-67138
- Ks{
- 09 Dec 2017
Anonym, 09 Dec 2017They didn't test the Mi6, so your point is what exactly?Mi6 I own one and I say you the camera is not good.For a example, my galaxy note 4 (2014) have a better camera than the mi6
- D
- AnonD-67138
- Ks{
- 09 Dec 2017
Chinese invasion!
- ?
- Anonymous
- uS$
- 09 Dec 2017
This obsession with DxOMark scores is ridiculous. Anything above 80 is good enough, period.
- A
- Anonym
- Lc2
- 09 Dec 2017
Anonymous, 09 Dec 2017I agree. Dxomark has lost so much credibility with phone bu... moreIf they are anything like the subsidiary OnePlus, the dot pattern along with other oddities (with anything other than the stock camera) should really throw them down in any serious review.
Who am I kidding, DxO couldn't care less for a fundamentally broken camera API as long as the stock camera hides the artifacts.
- ?
- Anonymous
- uS$
- 09 Dec 2017
The amount of unsubstantiated accusations here is staggering. I see no receipts, no video evidence, nothing. Nice.
- ?
- Anonymous
- ELT
- 09 Dec 2017
P11 does beat itself Chinese bro (triple lenses/40MP)
- A
- Anonym
- Lc2
- 09 Dec 2017
BCHLIU, 08 Dec 2017Why do people even TRUST DXOMark anymore? Their testing is ... moreThey didn't test the Mi6, so your point is what exactly?
- ?
- Anonymous
- XNc
- 09 Dec 2017
BCHLIU, 08 Dec 2017Why do people even TRUST DXOMark anymore? Their testing is ... moreThat's the difference software makes I guess
- M
- Mark
- tRr
- 09 Dec 2017
Why all the hate? Just because its xiaomi? A small player company in android phone industry? Why there isnt so much hate when apple and sammy get good numbers? Effing libs, cant handle the truth. Get a life people, theres more into living than just cellphone.
- ?
- Anonymous
- ELT
- 09 Dec 2017
Just because a few dollars, totally smell of paid xD
- D
- AnonD-581297
- t@g
- 09 Dec 2017
Hey i want to go check the detail about this. But for some reason i can't open it, the site is error. Anybody has this issue?
- a
- ashok
- rJK
- 09 Dec 2017
Looks like sony alone is not paying for anything, cant believe the low score of XZ premium.
- Z
- ZloiYuri
- Tmf
- 09 Dec 2017
Anonymous, 09 Dec 2017They used to take pics of same scenes, so we could compare ... moreG6 has tiny sensor and colir reproduction issues. Photos in street shadows shows unnatural sky. Huge noice levels. Etc etc etc. G6 has not that bad camera, just very cheap.
- ?
- Anonymous
- q{b
- 09 Dec 2017
and in other news, DxOMarks takes money from Xiaomi
- ?
- Anonymous
- KZ8
- 09 Dec 2017
AnonD-143696, 09 Dec 201794? It means this phone takes pictures as good as the 93 iP... moreWho would've own apple and xiaomi? :s
- D
- AnonD-697624
- IW@
- 09 Dec 2017
Kyo, 08 Dec 2017I would prefer more megapixels with big size pixels over op... moreYes, the Nokia 1020 was a great phone. It's photos are better in some ways than today's market leaders and the phone itself was made of tough and practical plastic, not glass, not aluminum. Nokia perfected plastic for phones, but Apple made aluminum the "premium" product. Sad.
- D
- AnonD-373654
- gwF
- 09 Dec 2017
AnonD-456831, 08 Dec 2017What!!!!? I have it. Sure it takes great shots. But not eve... moreBut the photo score of mi note 3 is higher than iphone 8 in DXOmark.. so you are either implying you know better than Dxo experts or Xiaomi can pay more than apple to DXO just for exaggerating the score.. which one is it?
- D
- AnonD-143696
- tDS
- 09 Dec 2017
94? It means this phone takes pictures as good as the 93 iPhone 8? Can someone who owns both devices confirm this?