Qualcomm's 8150 next flagship SoC gets Bluetooth certification
- Walter C. Dornez
- r93
- 05 Oct 2018
jr7, 05 Oct 2018I think this is a Samsung device model SM8150 not Qualcomm 8150Qualcomm has actually confirmed their next chipset is going to be 8150
- ?
- Anonymous
- MAf
- 05 Oct 2018
Qualcomm used to be good but after the 820 they havent had anything good... they are old news.
Apple A series, Huaweis Kirin and Samsungs Exynos are all better.
Especially Apple and Huawei who implement tech first, they both have 7nm chips while Snapdragon wont have a phone with it running for another few months. Not good at all
- Whackcar
- tZt
- 05 Oct 2018
They are changing the name to imply that it is a bigger upgrade than usual and also to hype it up as something new and different. They will advertise it as a new type of advanced SoC, and make bold and ambitious claims regarding it's performance & AI features ... I can predict it with confidence.
- ?
- Anonymous
- mJw
- 05 Oct 2018
Snapdragon CPU s are very reliable unlike Mediatek.
- Kiyasuriin
- Hxm
- 05 Oct 2018
Anonymous, 05 Oct 20188150??? Is that the improved SnapDragon 810 chipset then?Actually, the supposedly SD855
- ?
- Anonymous
- LaT
- 05 Oct 2018
8150??? Is that the improved SnapDragon 810 chipset then?
- Kiyasuriin
- Hxm
- 05 Oct 2018
Shellyman Infinity, 05 Oct 2018By looking at your username.... Yeah, we don't take fanboys... moreTrue.
- Shellyman Infinity
- B1E
- 05 Oct 2018
appleboy, 05 Oct 2018So slow and it's not eve out. The Lag-Dragon range...... W... moreBy looking at your username.... Yeah, we don't take fanboys like you seriously.
- Kingslayer
- cUU
- 05 Oct 2018
I don't believe in Qualcomm anymore except in their modems. They plateau'd in 2014. Since Apple's A9 chip, Snapdragon SoCs have fallen behind ever since. Only reason iPhone X lost in speed tests last year was because iOS11 was an abomination.
- U
- Umbilical Noose
- XNU
- 05 Oct 2018
The Voice of Reason, 05 Oct 2018Qualcomm uses the most atrocious naming scheme in the indus... moreAtrocious? Good thing you don't know/remember the previous scheme. Good thing they are using simple numbers now though. Much easier to keep track.
Also 8th gen i3 is faster than 7th gen i5. Food for thought.
- ?
- Anonymous
- iL5
- 05 Oct 2018
Kiyasuriin, 05 Oct 2018Oh really? Then why the Snapdragon845 beats it's counterpar... moreReal life performance? You meant “speed tests?”
If you did or didn’t, I’m just gonna leave this here anyways
https://youtu.be/W68nuVxOXaE
- Kiyasuriin
- nYT
- 05 Oct 2018
appleboy, 05 Oct 2018So slow and it's not eve out. The Lag-Dragon range......
W... moreOh really? Then why the Snapdragon845 beats it's counterpart (A11) in real life scenarios?
Benchmarks are used for assessing it's preformance, Real thing important is Real life preformance!
- Z
- ZloiYuri
- Tmf
- 05 Oct 2018
Kiyasuriin, 05 Oct 2018Let's say you were the Vice president of Qualcomm, which na... moreLet's mobile processors remain the same - tree-digit name. But for PC - four digits. Now it's a mess.
- S
- Syn
- YTY
- 05 Oct 2018
The Voice of Reason, 05 Oct 2018Qualcomm uses the most atrocious naming scheme in the indus... moreIf u compare the newer 6xx to much older 8xx then obviously they will be faster. A new gen i5 from Intel is usually faster than a couple gen old i7...
- ?
- Anonymous
- KSy
- 05 Oct 2018
Will it beat A11 this time?
- Kiyasuriin
- nYT
- 05 Oct 2018
The Voice of Reason, 05 Oct 2018Qualcomm uses the most atrocious naming scheme in the indus... moreLet's say you were the Vice president of Qualcomm, which naming scheme you would use? In a way it wouldn't be TOO crazy?
- a
- appleboy
- vxW
- 05 Oct 2018
So slow and it's not eve out. The Lag-Dragon range......
We asked Apple for the A12 to be faster and it is.
- ?
- Anonymous
- Si1
- 05 Oct 2018
So this is the Snapdragon 855??
- S
- Shanti Dope
- Kg{
- 05 Oct 2018
Kiyasuriin, 05 Oct 2018How would you name it then? ^^;Doing something like Apple does.
The naming scheme is so easy, that even an idiot would know that A10 Fusion is faster than A9.
Qualcomm, on the other hand, is very confusing. People might infer the SD801 to be better than SD710, because 801>710 mathematically speaking