Samsung is shutting down its custom CPU core department, will use standard ARM cores
- ?
- Anonymous
- IbG
- 05 Nov 2019
Is about time they just can't compete with Qualcomm.
- ?
- Anonymous
- atf
- 05 Nov 2019
[deleted post]Huawei phones doesn’t has 4k@60fps, no slow mo 1080@240fps, no slow mo 950fps and there UI lot lighter than Samsung one UI so. Yeah now Huawei adds 4K@60fps without google services still there phone perform well let Huawei adds one UI and galaxy camera fetuses including Samsung bloatware to there phones and let see how’s there phones perform.
- ?
- Anonymous
- atf
- 05 Nov 2019
kenji, 05 Nov 2019Apples aren't really great, they just have fewer device var... moreWish if Samsung has there own OS with there own hardware like Apple iPhone.
- ?
- Anonymous
- atf
- 05 Nov 2019
Anonymous, 05 Nov 2019Um the mongoose 1st and 2nd generation cores were stronger,... moreWho told You first generation of mongoose are better I used all mongoose generation of Exyons since galaxy S6 till S10 plus Exyons 9820 and there’s no comparison 4th generation are a lot better than first and second generation with almost no throttling and overall excellent performance even for gaming except for few games like PUBG that not important anymore.
- ?
- Anonymous
- atf
- 05 Nov 2019
Anonymous, 05 Nov 2019Kirin will surpass Qualcomm in the next 2-3 years so no big... moreWithout OS lol.
- ?
- Anonymous
- atf
- 05 Nov 2019
NAND-roid, 05 Nov 2019Its so funny gsm Is full of noobs ignorants and haters. The... moreExactly. I prefer Exyons over snapdragon for better single core performance and no random throttling like snapdragon Soc.
- M
- Manhurt
- u7V
- 05 Nov 2019
Well, Exynos will have good performance without it. Just like Kirin SoC's.
- V
- Vegetaholic
- Snq
- 05 Nov 2019
mixa, 04 Nov 2019Why even bother making these weird and inefficient Exynos S... moreAnd rely on one supplier? To risky, since S810 fiasco can happen any time, plus Exynos can surpass Snapdragon, comoetition is all the times better for end of user
- V
- Vegetaholic
- Snq
- 05 Nov 2019
No wonder, Mongoose cores was major dissapointment in last coupke of years comparing to Snapdragon competition
- D
- AnonD-731363
- SH3
- 05 Nov 2019
Finaly Qualcomm was a lot betetr anyway.
- N
- NAND-roid
- NdA
- 05 Nov 2019
Its so funny gsm Is full of noobs ignorants and haters. They know nothing about tech but comment. Even Qualcomm use standard arm-cortex A core for theirs mid ranges socs...Huawei kirin socs then use basic cortex -A core even theirs cpu is customised. Mediatek the same. So what is the problem if samsung is genuine arm-cortex core for theirs socs? Let me explain for the ignorants. Arm cortex architecture is the standard. Mongoose core of exynos is just a custom version of cortex-A cores. So keep calm haters exynos is not dying, samsung mobile divison too. Just mongoose core are remplaced by cortex (A77 i suppose)
- ?
- Anonymous
- I8m
- 05 Nov 2019
The last Oracle, 05 Nov 2019People have strange reactions without understanding enough.... moreThat nice rant of yours would make sense of the exynos chips in 8 out of 10 generations were not overall superior in most ways.
Not to mention simple common sense that making a jump to custom designed large cores would take a coulle tries to get a more mature and refined design.
And many other jumps like multicore or when apple moved onto designing large vores at forst also suffered. In heat, throttling, and efficiency.
Its nothing new. Could they have done better? Especially with the kernel and scheduler? Duh. But its no where near this monumental failure people claim. Thats just childish.
And any one deciding that it failed and not seeing the ulcoming potential and refinements clearly has no clue about the matter. And clearly should not be making such a decision.
Cutting them off like that is what makes anything spent the last couple years on this the most wasteful and meaningless.
- ?
- Anonymous
- I8m
- 05 Nov 2019
The last Oracle, 05 Nov 2019Samsung is NOT moving to only Qualcom made processors/SoCs.... moreUm the mongoose 1st and 2nd generation cores were stronger, throttled less, and were more efficient. Its the mongoose 3rd and 4th ones that were new takes on larger cores.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 0UY
- 05 Nov 2019
Kirin will surpass Qualcomm in the next 2-3 years so no big loss here
- D
- AnonD-844232
- m5M
- 05 Nov 2019
Kirrin will be king
- ?
- Anonymous
- vry
- 05 Nov 2019
Poor execs might starve if they don't do this.
On top of having to sell new garbage, like those other companies, every other month.
- ?
- Anonymous
- pj8
- 05 Nov 2019
The last Oracle, 05 Nov 2019Samsung is NOT moving to only Qualcom made processors/SoCs.... moreShould have removed the -ose from the core name long ago, the first 5 letters plus -loid is what they are
- ?
- Anonymous
- pj8
- 05 Nov 2019
[deleted post]Most unprovable statement of the decade, and possibly extremely false.
- ?
- Anonymous
- pj8
- 05 Nov 2019
About time, it will not remove the exynos incompatibility issues but will reduce the annoyances a bit. Last samsung i had i waited so long for apps to work that the phone was outdated before half if it were patched. Which in turn drive me to iPhone, would have done it much sooner had i known how flawless and incredible fast iPhones were/are, but i still buy android phones like every two years, only HTC with high end snapdragon to avoid the cascading compatibility headaches from kirin and exynos.
- k
- kenji
- f0G
- 05 Nov 2019
SteveFox, 04 Nov 20195 generations of failures to catch up to both QC and ARM an... moreApples aren't really great, they just have fewer device variants and their own OS to monopolize. Also, the change samsung is implementing won't affect standard usage and competitiveness negatively, its actually a good thing. The money lost is theirs and theirs alone. Dont lament for them here.