Exynos 2100 is a big step up from 990, still behind Snapdragon 888
- S
- SpiritWolf
- m@2
- 02 Feb 2021
So Kirin seems to be most efficient of them? Yeah, sure, it misses X! core but nowadays even mid range chipsets do more than average user needs. A lot more.
- -
- -Trix-
- mhV
- 02 Feb 2021
https://youtu.be/4bZpTD3T5Vc
But which one is the true throttling king? *spoiler* they both did really bad job
- ?
- Anonymous
- gqf
- 02 Feb 2021
Kirin is the perfect chip in my opinion. it has everythinng, performance, battery and connection quality.
- A
- Anonymous
- rJh
- 02 Feb 2021
Mohammed.althwadi, 02 Feb 2021lol just do some research and homework and you'll be s... morePot calling kettle Black?
TSMC transistor density is superior to Samsung.
- ?
- Anonymous
- L7b
- 02 Feb 2021
What a surprise
- Mohammed.althwadi
- CD%
- 02 Feb 2021
jamalu96, 02 Feb 2021seems like the TSMC's 7nm is efficient than Samsung�... morelol just do some research and homework and you'll be surprised by how stupid and unrelated these statements are !
tsmc and samsung fabrications has nothibg to do with these results
you're just trying to throw something you've probably read somewhere else and doesn't even understand so be quiet
- A
- Anonymous
- rJh
- 02 Feb 2021
Quite pathetic that US banned Huawei.
2019-20 Kirin SoC's 810/820 were superior to 765G,as is the case with Kirin 9000,A14 currently.
- M
- MrDong
- xZI
- 02 Feb 2021
If your intention is just for regular use then this chipset should be more than enough with surprisingly good battery efficiency. Push it harder and it will throttle quickly. I read up a Notebookcheck review of the S21 Ultra and the TDP exceeds 10W, that’s way too much. 3DMark score is like 60% but it may not be under optimal conditions (wait for TechTablets review). Also check Gary Explains (Speed Test G) and the Exynos performs significantly worse compared to SD but there is a small possibility for a driver issue.
Overall a bit dissapointed with the Exynos 2100 though. Still better than 990 so Samsung is going into the right direction.
- R
- RS333
- CbA
- 02 Feb 2021
So instead of that, can we just say that the Exynos 990 was sooo bad in comparison to SD865 that Exynos 2100 "looks" better now ?
Just sayin', saw both chipsets' launch live(+other vids) and was "influenced" to say this.
- ?
- Anonymous
- S9u
- 02 Feb 2021
Kirin over any other cpu
- ?
- Anonymous
- PIF
- 02 Feb 2021
Yet in a lot of countries we are paying more for the exynos than the 888
Samsung should go down with the likes of lg and htc
- A
- Aquila
- 0Ud
- 02 Feb 2021
What should matter here? I would say performance per watt? As battery is a weak link and performance is very good for a flagship anyway?
- j
- jamalu96
- PGk
- 02 Feb 2021
Anonymous, 02 Feb 2021Good to see Golden Reviewer getting promoted.
Odd to see... moreseems like the TSMC's 7nm is efficient than Samsung's 5nm.
Even with the older Cortex-A77, Kirin performs better due to TSMC's 5nm.
If the SD 888 was manufactured using TSMC's 5nm instead of Samsung, the Exynos is nowhere near to the latest dragon.
- i0S...Never...Again
- 7kd
- 02 Feb 2021
AnonD-546724, 02 Feb 2021So you still paying more for less
How us Europeans are ... morePricing in Europe and rest of the world where Exynos is available is relatively the same.
It's way expensive in UK specifically.
- N
- Not Samsung Fans
- uQ5
- 02 Feb 2021
Dani2018, 02 Feb 2021Of course is 888 is faster. Exynos is always slower and behind . Yes man, Exynos is really way behind Snapdragon. Do checkout the YouTube review
- D
- AnonD-920712
- txp
- 02 Feb 2021
yeah snapdragon 888 is still the best.
But exynos 2100 finally good at HD graphic games and also battery power consumption.
I saw it from some tech reviewers.
- i0S...Never...Again
- 7kd
- 02 Feb 2021
Anonymous, 02 Feb 2021Good to see Golden Reviewer getting promoted. Odd to see... moreThe X1 core seems to be too power hungry.
- ?
- Anonymous
- 8uS
- 02 Feb 2021
Good to see Golden Reviewer getting promoted.
Odd to see the 7nm SD865 being more efficient than 5nm SD888 though.
- P
- Peter UK
- mpf
- 02 Feb 2021
i0S...Never...Again, 02 Feb 2021I saw the video you are referring to... For whatever re... moreWell exactly! I was so confused reading this article, literally as if someone posted it without reading before what they wrote. So high majority is using phones for browser, social media and Netflix on go. In this scenario Samsung exynos is using more power to run the phone so in the end you again are getting less screen time over snapdragon version. Flagships nowadays are so powerful that if you not into games, they will keep your experience fluid and strong for years. But with that exynos will be worse on day to day tasks, as they mentioned 26% less efficient in total. How is this not clear? I'm waiting for videos comparing battery usage just to confirm this...
- i0S...Never...Again
- 7kd
- 02 Feb 2021
Anonymous, 02 Feb 2021Good job Gsmarena for giving golden retriever guy credit.
... moreI saw the video you are referring to...
For whatever reasons, Exynos 2100 is able to give much better performance and stability in power saving mode but it consumes way more battery despite power saving mode being turned on.
Snapdragon 888 on the other hand, gives slightly improved stability and much needed power savings but decreased performance which means power saving mode is working as it should be.
I suspect A14 chip inside IPhone is running in power saving modes all the time to prevent overheating and reducing battery usage.